Comments 1-5 of 5

  • Tom Wagoner

    07/11/2013 10:43 PM

    I can't find another way to comment so i'll do it here., On the abortion issue. Has anybody ever sued to stop an abortion by using the mans right as a father to save his child's life? I realize that white Anglo-Saxon, Christian, heterosexual males have almost no rights but it might be worth a try.

  • Teri Ploski

    07/11/2013 05:58 PM

    I listened to your segment with Todd Starnes about the Tech Sgt who is being retired. I find it interesting that they are citing "incompatible with military service" as the reason. That was the very reason we discharged those who self-identified as gay or were identified as gay when I was a paralegal in the 80's-90's (I retired in 2000). How far we have come in just one generation.

  • Juliette Anne Kozak

    07/11/2013 04:01 PM

    Mr. Huckabee, the only constitutional aspect of the immigration bill is controlling the border. the rest of this bill, as with all socialist programs are unconstitutional at the federal level. They fall under states rights where the people can vote on how they choos to make these decisions decisions. We already have a legal immigration program where citizens prove their worthiness to become citizens, not for the politicians can make money and buy votes. Our founders gave us a republic where the people in the states control the federal government, as demonstrated by the Bill of Rights. They protected us against a tyrannical federal government, which has been in process since Wilsons Administration. I don't question your motives, you have a good Christian testimony otherwise, but you are misleading your audience when you promote any socialist program at the federal level.

  • Charles Shipley

    07/11/2013 02:23 PM

    ALL THE DEMOCRATS ON TV KEEP SAYING THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT THEM TO GET THIS AMNISTY LEGISLATION (OF COARSE THEY DON'T CALL IT THAT) COMPLETED ..... I WISH THE REPUBLICANS WOULD SHUT THEM UP WITH, THE AMERICANS WANT THE CURRENT LAWS ENFORCED ON IMMIGRATION.

  • Paul weaver

    07/11/2013 10:46 AM

    I liked your report today around "a house divided" and the direction the Federal govt is taking vs the State govts and the peoples' various referendums.

    However, your mis-attribution of the quote to Lincoln was surprising. Granted, Lincoln said it. But shame on you - especially an ordained minister - for attributing Christ's words to Lincoln, whom Lincoln was quoting. Pleas see the following from the synoptic Gospels:

    If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand. (Mark 3:25 HCSB)

    Knowing their thoughts, Yeshua said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is destroyed, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand. (The Gospel according to Matthew 12:25 TLB)

    But He knew their thoughts and said to them, "Any kingdom divided against itself is laid waste; and a house divided against itself falls. (Luke 11:17 NASB)

    Keep up the good work.