Self-government requires self-discipline

July 3, 2019 |

There are a lot of things people like to believe that are patently absurd if you think about it.  Much of the Obama Administration was based on making nonsensical declarations – we can’t just drill our way out of an energy shortage, it would take a magic wand to bring back manufacturing jobs, 2 percent growth is the “new normal,” etc. – all delivered in a somber, imperious tone that made them sound like unassailable fact. One of the most common pieces of false conventional wisdom is that “the government can’t legislate morality!” 

But of course, they do it all the time.  We have millions of laws, just to enforce society’s consensus of what’s morally right or wrong. Liberals used to protest this, and now they’re the chief generators of morality laws, usually bans on everything they find morally offensive, including smoking, using racist words (or the “wrong” pronoun), giving someone a plastic straw, etc. etc. etc. Each law comes with loopholes that someone will try to exploit, so government adds more laws. Plus police, courts and jails, because some people will always insist on doing the wrong thing anyway.  All to legislate morality.

Self-government requires self-discipline, self-respect, and respect for others.  When people don’t follow an accepted standard moral code, government keeps passing new laws to try to force them to, which creates bigger government and more expense for everybody.  Maybe the national debt wouldn’t be sky high now if our behavior standards hadn’t sunk so low. 

How much do people’s bad personal choices end up costing all the rest of us?  You might be surprised at the size of the bill.  When I left the governor’s office in Arkansas, we had more than 13,000 inmates in the Department of Corrections.  Just keeping them locked up cost taxpayers more than $220 million a year.  That’s more than it would have cost to send 13,000 kids to any college in the state, all expenses paid.  If every prison inmate had just lived a moral life and stayed out of trouble, the taxpayers could have enjoyed a $220 million tax cut.  Or the money might have been used to improve roads and services that benefit everyone. 

From the left, I’d always hear that we should spend more money on prisoners or else turn more of them loose.  From the right, I’d hear that we should lock up more people and eliminate parole while cutting the prison budget.  Both were unrealistic.  But hardly anyone wanted to talk about the real problem: the lack of morality that led to all those people being locked up in the first place. 

And what about juvenile offenders?  Every kid placed into our Division of Youth Services cost taxpayers up to $80,000 a year.  If they’d all had stable, nurturing homes and been taught to be obedient, responsible and moral, it would’ve saved the taxpayers of just that one state $80 million a year.  Imagine how many parks we could have built for all kids to enjoy, or how many books we could’ve bought for school libraries, if we could’ve freed up $80 million a year in the state budget.

A lot of kids get into trouble because of peer pressure.  They think breaking the rules makes them look cool to their friends.  So kids, when someone you know starts acting up, instead of rewarding them with your admiration, please tell them instead, “That’s not cool!  Thanks for costing us our parks and turning our generation into tax slaves, jerk!” 

Hey, as long as kids are going to be vulnerable to peer pressure, why not use its power for good?   

 

 

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 26-30 of 30

  • M Bray

    07/03/2019 12:51 PM

    After watching the Democratic politicians debate, I’m very worried about our country. Their ideas are frightening.

  • Laurie Keiski

    07/03/2019 12:44 PM

    Right on, particularly the home environment cause. I do believe that those in positions of power are also to blame. I’m in my 80’s and it seemed that prior to 2009, race relations were steadily improving. Then we got black lives matter and serious increase in inner city crime. Seems the new crop of presidential candidates are pushing the same narrative. Jus my 2 cents.

  • james randolph

    07/03/2019 11:51 AM

    (excerpt from book LEGISLATING MORALITY)
    "...CAN WE LEGISLATE MORALITY?
    News flash: all laws legislate morality. We go into great detail to support this point in our book Legislating Morality, but to be brief, morality is about right and wrong, and all laws declare one behavior right and the opposite behavior wrong. So the question is not whether or not we can legislate morality, but whose morality will we legislate?

    Legislating morality is not only biblical, it is a necessary responsibility of government. When Paul writes in Romans 13:1–8 that the ruling authorities are put in place by God to punish evildoers, he is echoing Genesis 9:6, which established that the central responsibility of government is to protect the innocent from evil. That, of course, requires the legislation and enforcement of good laws...."
    ...https://www.equip.org/article/is-legislating-morality-biblical-2/

  • Robert Skinner

    07/03/2019 11:21 AM

    Mike,
    Excellent commentary. I totally concur. George Washington, in his farewell address, basically cited the same observations.
    It is only by God's Manifest Grace that we became the great nation that we have been.
    We abandon that God given high moral code at our own peril.
    It certainly appears as though that is what the democrat socialists are bent upon doing.
    Hopefully we have sufficient numbers of right thinkers to thwart their efforts.

  • Paul Kern

    07/03/2019 10:59 AM

    Returning to the colonial times. Need to be on our knees in prayer. Only Christ can change the hearts of men. We may come to a time when there is a second civil war. I pray not.

Self-government requires self-discipline

July 3, 2019 |

There are a lot of things people like to believe that are patently absurd if you think about it.  Much of the Obama Administration was based on making nonsensical declarations – we can’t just drill our way out of an energy shortage, it would take a magic wand to bring back manufacturing jobs, 2 percent growth is the “new normal,” etc. – all delivered in a somber, imperious tone that made them sound like unassailable fact. One of the most common pieces of false conventional wisdom is that “the government can’t legislate morality!” 

But of course, they do it all the time.  We have millions of laws, just to enforce society’s consensus of what’s morally right or wrong. Liberals used to protest this, and now they’re the chief generators of morality laws, usually bans on everything they find morally offensive, including smoking, using racist words (or the “wrong” pronoun), giving someone a plastic straw, etc. etc. etc. Each law comes with loopholes that someone will try to exploit, so government adds more laws. Plus police, courts and jails, because some people will always insist on doing the wrong thing anyway.  All to legislate morality.

Self-government requires self-discipline, self-respect, and respect for others.  When people don’t follow an accepted standard moral code, government keeps passing new laws to try to force them to, which creates bigger government and more expense for everybody.  Maybe the national debt wouldn’t be sky high now if our behavior standards hadn’t sunk so low. 

How much do people’s bad personal choices end up costing all the rest of us?  You might be surprised at the size of the bill.  When I left the governor’s office in Arkansas, we had more than 13,000 inmates in the Department of Corrections.  Just keeping them locked up cost taxpayers more than $220 million a year.  That’s more than it would have cost to send 13,000 kids to any college in the state, all expenses paid.  If every prison inmate had just lived a moral life and stayed out of trouble, the taxpayers could have enjoyed a $220 million tax cut.  Or the money might have been used to improve roads and services that benefit everyone. 

From the left, I’d always hear that we should spend more money on prisoners or else turn more of them loose.  From the right, I’d hear that we should lock up more people and eliminate parole while cutting the prison budget.  Both were unrealistic.  But hardly anyone wanted to talk about the real problem: the lack of morality that led to all those people being locked up in the first place. 

And what about juvenile offenders?  Every kid placed into our Division of Youth Services cost taxpayers up to $80,000 a year.  If they’d all had stable, nurturing homes and been taught to be obedient, responsible and moral, it would’ve saved the taxpayers of just that one state $80 million a year.  Imagine how many parks we could have built for all kids to enjoy, or how many books we could’ve bought for school libraries, if we could’ve freed up $80 million a year in the state budget.

A lot of kids get into trouble because of peer pressure.  They think breaking the rules makes them look cool to their friends.  So kids, when someone you know starts acting up, instead of rewarding them with your admiration, please tell them instead, “That’s not cool!  Thanks for costing us our parks and turning our generation into tax slaves, jerk!” 

Hey, as long as kids are going to be vulnerable to peer pressure, why not use its power for good?   

 

 

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 26-30 of 30

  • M Bray

    07/03/2019 12:51 PM

    After watching the Democratic politicians debate, I’m very worried about our country. Their ideas are frightening.

  • Laurie Keiski

    07/03/2019 12:44 PM

    Right on, particularly the home environment cause. I do believe that those in positions of power are also to blame. I’m in my 80’s and it seemed that prior to 2009, race relations were steadily improving. Then we got black lives matter and serious increase in inner city crime. Seems the new crop of presidential candidates are pushing the same narrative. Jus my 2 cents.

  • james randolph

    07/03/2019 11:51 AM

    (excerpt from book LEGISLATING MORALITY)
    "...CAN WE LEGISLATE MORALITY?
    News flash: all laws legislate morality. We go into great detail to support this point in our book Legislating Morality, but to be brief, morality is about right and wrong, and all laws declare one behavior right and the opposite behavior wrong. So the question is not whether or not we can legislate morality, but whose morality will we legislate?

    Legislating morality is not only biblical, it is a necessary responsibility of government. When Paul writes in Romans 13:1–8 that the ruling authorities are put in place by God to punish evildoers, he is echoing Genesis 9:6, which established that the central responsibility of government is to protect the innocent from evil. That, of course, requires the legislation and enforcement of good laws...."
    ...https://www.equip.org/article/is-legislating-morality-biblical-2/

  • Robert Skinner

    07/03/2019 11:21 AM

    Mike,
    Excellent commentary. I totally concur. George Washington, in his farewell address, basically cited the same observations.
    It is only by God's Manifest Grace that we became the great nation that we have been.
    We abandon that God given high moral code at our own peril.
    It certainly appears as though that is what the democrat socialists are bent upon doing.
    Hopefully we have sufficient numbers of right thinkers to thwart their efforts.

  • Paul Kern

    07/03/2019 10:59 AM

    Returning to the colonial times. Need to be on our knees in prayer. Only Christ can change the hearts of men. We may come to a time when there is a second civil war. I pray not.

Self-government requires self-discipline

July 3, 2019 |

There are a lot of things people like to believe that are patently absurd if you think about it.  Much of the Obama Administration was based on making nonsensical declarations – we can’t just drill our way out of an energy shortage, it would take a magic wand to bring back manufacturing jobs, 2 percent growth is the “new normal,” etc. – all delivered in a somber, imperious tone that made them sound like unassailable fact. One of the most common pieces of false conventional wisdom is that “the government can’t legislate morality!” 

But of course, they do it all the time.  We have millions of laws, just to enforce society’s consensus of what’s morally right or wrong. Liberals used to protest this, and now they’re the chief generators of morality laws, usually bans on everything they find morally offensive, including smoking, using racist words (or the “wrong” pronoun), giving someone a plastic straw, etc. etc. etc. Each law comes with loopholes that someone will try to exploit, so government adds more laws. Plus police, courts and jails, because some people will always insist on doing the wrong thing anyway.  All to legislate morality.

Self-government requires self-discipline, self-respect, and respect for others.  When people don’t follow an accepted standard moral code, government keeps passing new laws to try to force them to, which creates bigger government and more expense for everybody.  Maybe the national debt wouldn’t be sky high now if our behavior standards hadn’t sunk so low. 

How much do people’s bad personal choices end up costing all the rest of us?  You might be surprised at the size of the bill.  When I left the governor’s office in Arkansas, we had more than 13,000 inmates in the Department of Corrections.  Just keeping them locked up cost taxpayers more than $220 million a year.  That’s more than it would have cost to send 13,000 kids to any college in the state, all expenses paid.  If every prison inmate had just lived a moral life and stayed out of trouble, the taxpayers could have enjoyed a $220 million tax cut.  Or the money might have been used to improve roads and services that benefit everyone. 

From the left, I’d always hear that we should spend more money on prisoners or else turn more of them loose.  From the right, I’d hear that we should lock up more people and eliminate parole while cutting the prison budget.  Both were unrealistic.  But hardly anyone wanted to talk about the real problem: the lack of morality that led to all those people being locked up in the first place. 

And what about juvenile offenders?  Every kid placed into our Division of Youth Services cost taxpayers up to $80,000 a year.  If they’d all had stable, nurturing homes and been taught to be obedient, responsible and moral, it would’ve saved the taxpayers of just that one state $80 million a year.  Imagine how many parks we could have built for all kids to enjoy, or how many books we could’ve bought for school libraries, if we could’ve freed up $80 million a year in the state budget.

A lot of kids get into trouble because of peer pressure.  They think breaking the rules makes them look cool to their friends.  So kids, when someone you know starts acting up, instead of rewarding them with your admiration, please tell them instead, “That’s not cool!  Thanks for costing us our parks and turning our generation into tax slaves, jerk!” 

Hey, as long as kids are going to be vulnerable to peer pressure, why not use its power for good?   

 

 

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 26-30 of 30

  • M Bray

    07/03/2019 12:51 PM

    After watching the Democratic politicians debate, I’m very worried about our country. Their ideas are frightening.

  • Laurie Keiski

    07/03/2019 12:44 PM

    Right on, particularly the home environment cause. I do believe that those in positions of power are also to blame. I’m in my 80’s and it seemed that prior to 2009, race relations were steadily improving. Then we got black lives matter and serious increase in inner city crime. Seems the new crop of presidential candidates are pushing the same narrative. Jus my 2 cents.

  • james randolph

    07/03/2019 11:51 AM

    (excerpt from book LEGISLATING MORALITY)
    "...CAN WE LEGISLATE MORALITY?
    News flash: all laws legislate morality. We go into great detail to support this point in our book Legislating Morality, but to be brief, morality is about right and wrong, and all laws declare one behavior right and the opposite behavior wrong. So the question is not whether or not we can legislate morality, but whose morality will we legislate?

    Legislating morality is not only biblical, it is a necessary responsibility of government. When Paul writes in Romans 13:1–8 that the ruling authorities are put in place by God to punish evildoers, he is echoing Genesis 9:6, which established that the central responsibility of government is to protect the innocent from evil. That, of course, requires the legislation and enforcement of good laws...."
    ...https://www.equip.org/article/is-legislating-morality-biblical-2/

  • Robert Skinner

    07/03/2019 11:21 AM

    Mike,
    Excellent commentary. I totally concur. George Washington, in his farewell address, basically cited the same observations.
    It is only by God's Manifest Grace that we became the great nation that we have been.
    We abandon that God given high moral code at our own peril.
    It certainly appears as though that is what the democrat socialists are bent upon doing.
    Hopefully we have sufficient numbers of right thinkers to thwart their efforts.

  • Paul Kern

    07/03/2019 10:59 AM

    Returning to the colonial times. Need to be on our knees in prayer. Only Christ can change the hearts of men. We may come to a time when there is a second civil war. I pray not.