Message from Mike Huckabee

    Help me fight back against Big Tech censorship. If you would like to subscribe to the daily, advertisement-free version of my newsletter for $5 monthly or $36 annually, on Substack, go here.

    In Depth News Stories

    August 17, 2022

    The White House still won’t comment on last Monday’s raid on Mar-A-Lago. President Biden was quickly spirited away on vacation, and the unfortunate spokesperson left behind refuses to answer any questions. But it’s easy to see why. If Biden had anything to do with this action against a former President and likely 2024 election opponent, or even knew about it and didn’t stop it, that would certainly be an impeachable offense.

    Of course, it’s ridiculous to believe the White House didn’t know about something this consequential. But if anyone can sound convincing saying he doesn’t know anything, it’s Biden.

    Consider that Trump was impeached for even mentioning towards the end of a phone call to Ukrainian President Zelenskyy that he might want to look into what Hunter Biden was up to and letting him know Biden had bragged about "stopping the prosecution."  A so-called whistleblower, later identified as Eric Ciaramella, wrote up a complaint greatly mischaracterizing the call. Fortunately, Trump was able to clarify what did and did not happen on that call by releasing the transcript. (Hey, the President can declassify documents, remember?) Then as now, transparency is the best option when one is telling the truth, and that’s why Trump wants the affidavit for the raid released and the ‘Justice’ Department doesn’t.

    Alan Dershowitz, appearing Tuesday with Sean Hannity, said there's a principle he follows: “If there’s a dispute, and one side wants the truth to come out, and the other side says, ‘No, we DON’T want the truth to come out,’ always believe the person who wants the truth to come out. That’s the person who’s telling the truth.” Dershowitz also said that sensitive information --- names of sources, for example --- can still be redacted. And let’s hope the Trump people just release the security video to the public and let us see what happened.

    Dershowitz said that to get a search warrant for a safe, “you have to have very particular evidence of what was in the safe.” What did they think was in there? (Of course, we all know what was there: nothing!)  And what did they think was in Melania’s closet? Seeing the affidavit is essential.

    Dershowitz doesn’t think Trump will be indicted. For the appointee of a current President to indict a future presidential opponent, “you need Nixon-type crimes,” he said. “Smoking guns. You need absolute corruption.” He doesn’t think it can be over “what Hillary Clinton did and what Sandy Berger did.”

    “The optics here are ugly,” legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said Tuesday, “and Americans deserve a greater measure of truth.” As for putting Trump on trial in a DC court, he said, “You could prove Christmas occurred in July in a DC court, but it wouldn’t hold up on appeal.”

    A hearing is scheduled for Thursday on whether or not the affidavit will be made public. Trump attorney Alina Habba appeared with host Sean Duffy on FOX NEWS Tuesday evening to talk about the affidavit, and she said she does not expect it to be unsealed. “Don’t forget, Judge Reinhart is the same magistrate judge that recused himself from my Hillary case about a month ago,” she said, referring to the lawsuit Trump has against Hillary and other Democrats over the Trump-Russia Hoax. Recall that Judge Bruce Reinhart recused himself in that case, reportedly over the issue of impartiality, and if he couldn’t be impartial on that, he had no business dealing with this. Of course, he’s also the one who was presented with the affidavit by the DOJ and signed the warrant for the raid.

    “He is definitely not going to be a friendly judge, necessarily,” she said, showing her gift for understatement.

    She said Trump’s team has asked for an independent “special master,” a neutral party, to go through materials and “preclude any funny business” to see what might be safe to reveal, but the DOJ has indicated they do not want that. (My question: WHY NOT?) She also said they still need to go through the documents and see what is privileged.

    By now, the FBI has returned the three passports (one current, two expired) that they never should have taken in the first place. And a few commentators have done my joke about Trump being a flight risk. “I don’t know how [taking Trump’s passports] is done even in error,” Habba said. Indeed, taking someone’s passport is a big deal and normally requires a special, separate warrant. ‘Unfortunately, there are a lot of questions that are unanswered at this point,” she said, “so we’ll see what happens on Thursday.”

    Here’s some bad journalism about the passport issue, from CBS News’ Norah O’Donnell:

    As Duffy reported, Peter Strzok tweeted a snarky attempt at humor that sounded right out of 2017: “Please oh please keep asking how you can turn down the temperature in the country. And why does he have two passports? The Russian passport, of course, is kept in a vault at Yasenevo and only swapped out at third country meets, so it can’t be that one.”

    It shouldn’t surprise us that Strzok is lamely sticking to his story of Trump being in league with Russia, even though we all know it was a frame-up, and he knows we know, and we know he knows we know.

    So, how can we tell that the story about “nuclear secrets” was made up after the fact? If that had been a real situation, Attorney General Merrick Garland wouldn’t have waited weeks to get those documents. But this involved “weeks of meetings between senior ‘Justice’ Department and FBI officials.” I can hear them now: “Okay, he needs to look really, really guilty. we target the home and grounds of a former and potentially future President with a land, sea and air invasion, or do we not? Think about the pros and cons, and we'll meet again closer to the election.”

    Jonathan Turley, in his new piece “The Incredible Shrinking Merrick Garland,” accurately describes the failings of our esteemed attorney general but concludes, oddly, that the AG's problem isn’t one of politics but of personality. He just doesn’t have the personality to be attorney general.

    Turley still thinks of Garland as a moderate --- never mind that virtually every decision he’s made as head of ‘Justice’ has smelled of political hackery and favored the left. He calls Garland a man of “unimpeachable integrity and ethics.” Funny he should use the word “unimpeachable,” as Garland seems eminently impeachable to me, in the literal sense.

    But here’s a thought: If it’s true that, as Turley says, “Garland’s judicial temperament may be ill-suited to the demands of this office,” maybe the decisions emanating from that office are really coming from his second-in-command...(drum roll)...Deputy Attorney General and former Obama attorney Lisa Monaco. As Garland shrinks in power, perhaps she grows. Here she is from January of this year, delivering “tantalizing news for those who want to see those at the highest levels brought to justice over the attempted coup,” talking about the DOJ’s “active criminal investigation into Trump fake electors coup plot.” It doesn’t get more political than that.


    RELATED STORY: FBI won’t release video to resolve January 6 “pipe bomb” questions

    For many months, REVOLVER NEWS has been doing some great reporting about the possible role of the FBI in the January 6 riot. Most recently, they say that “the FBI’s explanation for the January 6 pipe bombs is in fundamental conflict with a growing body of widely available facts.”

    These are the bombs that were discovered in front of the DNC and RNC headquarters just before the scheduled 1 PM congressional certification of the vote. The latest problem concerning them has to do with the old-fashioned mechanical kitchen timers --- with a maximum time setting of one hour –- used on the bombs. But according to security footage, the bombs were planted at about 8 PM the evening of January 5, 17 hours before they were discovered.

    As REVOLVER NEWS reports, the first timer was found near the RNC at 12:40 PM, with 20 minutes left on the timer, which would mean a detonation was timed to exactly coincide with Congress convening at 1 PM. The DNC timer also had just 20 minutes left, but the timer was stuck at that point.

    So their question is, did the pipe bomber just luck into the bombs being found at the right time to create the apparently hoped-for diversion, or was it no accident that they were found when they were? Their analysis, they say, is “absolutely devastating” to the FBI”s official narrative of the attempted bombings.

    If the timers actually worked –- and, yes, they were real bombs with real explosives –- they would’ve gone off at about 9 PM on the 5th and would not have created a diversion for law enforcement personnel at the Capitol the next day. Ditto if they happened to be discovered earlier on the morning of the 6th. In fact, that would’ve led to evacuations and heightened security around the Capitol building. Thus, the bomber had to know his bombs would be discovered and reported to authorities shortly before 1 PM.

    Since the RNC bomb was discovered at 12:40, the Capitol Police were on the scene at 12:49, which was just one minute before the first big attack at the west side of the Capitol. “In other words,” the report says, “we see nearly perfect timing to divert resources away from the breach.” A woman who lives nearby, identified as Karen Younger, said she’d found the bomb while she was on her way to do laundry. But back in February, Julie Kelly at AMERICAN GREATNESS found details that suggest yet another FBI hoax.

    At the time she found the bomb, Younger was working as a project manager for FirstNet Authority, a company that “prioritized emergency communications during an attack or disaster.” It counted the Justice Department among its clients and had signed a $92 million contract with the FBI just a few weeks before. That might not be significant, but it’s something to be explored.

    The DNC bomb was placed in plain sight in a high-traffic area. How was that bomb not discovered? It even had to evade detection by the Secret Service with bomb-sniffing dogs, as Kamala Harris was stopping by. She was in the building for two hours before the bomb was detected outside. The dogs apparently had just come down with COVID and lost their sense of smell.

    For when you have time, Kelly's article goes into much more weirdness about the planting of these bombs and some absurdly on-target predictions relating to them. There’s just so much about January 6 we still don’t know, and Nancy Pelosi’s kangaroo court is too busy playing politics to even look at it.

    It would be nice if the FBI would release ALL the security footage of the DNC bomber, but they won’t. Darren Beattie of REVOLVER NEWS appeared with Tucker Carlson Tuesday night to say “the FBI is withholding, hiding, concealing from the public critical footage of the pipe bomber actually planting the bomb...and the question is, why would they...hide precisely the piece of footage that would be most likely to help them get the public to catch and identify the perpetrator?”

    Plus, since they’d likely suspect a Trump supporter –- a “right-wing extremist” –- to have placed these bombs, why aren’t Democrats, especially the January 6 committee, clamoring for his arrest? Something smells off, but then, that’s typical of anything involving the FBI.

    Leave a Comment

    Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

    Your Information
    Your Comment
    BBML accepted!

    Comments 11-20 of 21

    • Ed Thompson

      08/17/2022 10:36 PM

      How convenient these bombs were stumbled upon in time to prevent something horrible from happening? And please tell me how anyone knows for absolute truth they really were bombs as you say. How do we know that one? They use the same people that now have been involved with raiding Trumps home so can we actually believe anything they said about them? If they took them apart, where’s the footage from the personal camera they use to watch the process? Oh yes it’s top secret how to deactivate something right? Yes it is but no one is asking for everything just show something that proves that they were real. And if it’s the footage of them detonating them that proves nothing except something they used blew up! A kitchen timer??? Who knows what movie the so called perp watched to get that idea from! I’m surprised it didn’t have eight D cell batteries and all red wires so no one could cut the red one and be a hero!! With a nice digital timer doing a count down backwards! Come on man— if they were seriously trying to catch who ever supposedly sat them around the video footage of the person or persons would have been plastered on every news channel repeatedly. I smell a rat in the whole entire story. Just wait till they grab some poor homeless guys and say they got them! My faith in this administration is less than zero! I will vote like our lives depends on it— it does! Just hope more people understand that too.

    • william p appelt

      08/17/2022 09:45 PM

      Love your sense of humor, " the bomb sniffing dogs came down with Covid". It makes me think about kangaroos.... They are instrumental in hiding the facts in with little joey in the pouch, who will bring them out when convenient.
      You can use this, yes?

    • Ila M. Davis

      08/17/2022 05:08 PM

      Knowing the judge was picked by Obummer, who feeds Biden his words through his handlers, you know it's all set up. Soros, Obama, Clinton, Biden, ad nauseum. You could be deaf and blind and know what is happening. Get to the roots! The dirty swamp creatures.

    • jack macdonald

      08/17/2022 04:40 PM

      Comment is unrelated to this newsletter, but I just keep wondering how giving millions of barrels of oil to a sworn enemy (China) is not treason. Trump is impeached for a phone call and this hunk of dung commits treason with impunity. Doesn't this merit an impeachment trial to last the rest of his term?

    • Grace A Blair

      08/17/2022 03:52 PM

      The FBI raid on Mar-a-lago was a lawful Watergate probe. The first attempt to take documents did not have juicy stuff the Democrats could use. So, without a taint squad (an impartial team to investigate) the Democrats did what Gordon Liddy, and his mod squad did, they took (stole) all President Trumps documents and got away with it. The Democrats are afraid of what our former president is planning. They had to know everything about President Trump so they could use his personal information and documents to turn his life against him to feed the hyenas called the media. This fall is going to be a blood bath of war on both sides. The media will try to feed as much false information as possible. Gordon Liddy would have been proud. "Why didn't I think of using our own government to spy?" Will the Democrats get called on their prank? Look at the Hunter Biden situation, the Hillary emails, Comey, and his gang. It would a great miracle if Trump ever saw his boxes again. If he did, a lot would be missing. We have a dangerous, corrupt government. How can we stop them before more innocent people are targeted?

    • Allegra Kitchens

      08/17/2022 03:35 PM

      Garland's problem is not that he doesn't have the personality to be Attorney General. After what he did or allowed to be done to Pres. Trump it is obvious his problem is that he doesn't have the moral fiber to be Attorney General. As to those wealthy and evil corporations, they are what gives us peons our jobs. Taxing them causes them to either fire people and/or cut work hours as well as pass their increased taxes on to the consumer in the form of more costly products. If they are going to hire 87,000 new IRS agents, send me a job application because I need to go back to work thanks to Uncle Joe and his puppet master's plan to fundamentally change, i.e. destroy the United States.

    • Mark Moses

      08/17/2022 02:53 PM

      Are you aware of “The Pit” gathering in Arizona this past Saturday, hosted by Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips? Incredible information about Chinese election interference. I think it would be a topic of great interest. As always, I look forward to your newsletter each day. Thank you for doing it.

    • nancy lyman

      08/17/2022 02:46 PM

      Loved today's report. thank you for your truthful updates. I send your comments to all my dear conservative friends often. We are all hungry for nothing but the truth.

    • Mike Spears

      08/17/2022 02:37 PM

      Gov Huckabee: Regarding the FBI Raid on Trump's home: If the FBI didn't compile an exhaustively detailed inventory of what they took as a result of said raid, it seems questionable that they will be able to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that any evidence (primarily documents) they cite in court was, in fact, taken from his home and not "planted." If they failed to do a proper inventory on site, before they left, they violated the most basic tenets of what they must have been taught in their "arrest-search-seizure" classes

    • Larry Lanier

      08/17/2022 12:29 PM

      You asked how it was that the January 6 bomb at the DNC escaped being seen by persons at the DNC? It is simple. If something doesn't lend itself to impeaching President Trump, the left can't see it.

    News Feed

    McConnell will step down as Senate Republican Leader in November

    Mitch McConnell announced Wednesday that he will step down as Senate Republican Leader in November. He is the longest-serving party leader in US history. He did not say if this has anything to do with the criticism he’s received from conservatives or with his recent health issues that caused him to freeze up in mid-sentence a time or two. But while he will no longer be the GOP leader, he intends to continue serving in the Senate at least through the end of his current term in January 2027.

    And here’s a surprise: Robert Kennedy Jr. suggested that McConnell be replaced by Sen. Rand Paul. RFK Jr. tweeted, “It’s time to promote leaders in Washington, DC, who won’t kowtow to the military contractors or push us deeper into foreign conflicts. We need representation who will prioritize American wellness over all else. I believe Rand Paul would be an incredible successor. He’s shown great judgment and has the grit to put hardworking Americans first.”

    -12:49 PM, 2/29/2024


    - 8:38 AM, 2/29/2024

    Get Out

    Law Professor William A. Jacobson of the Legal Insurrection blog has been watching the politicized lawfare against Trump and conservative businesses and organizations in New York, and the unprofessional threats and ugly gloating by Attorney General Letitia James about how she’s going to destroy Trump. He analyzed the situation in light of assurances by Gov. Hochul that if your business isn’t doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear. And he arrived at this conclusion: 

    “Get out of New York, if you can.” And if you can’t leave now, “Develop an exit plan before you need it.

    6:02 AM, 2/29/24


    Pray for the Panhandle

    Please join me in prayers today for those in the path of the huge wildfires in the Texas Panhandle and neighboring Oklahoma. There are five wildfires that are causing school closures and evacuations, including the evacuation of a nuclear power plant. The largest of them, the Smokehouse Creek Fire, covers 800 square miles and is now the second-largest wildfire in state history.

    This is a link to live updates on the fires from the Weather Channel.

    - 12:48 PM, 2/28/2024


    No test?!?

    The White House announced Wednesday that President Biden is making an unannounced trip to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for his yearly physical exam…which will NOT include a cognitive test. Press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre dismissed questions about a cognitive test, saying Biden proves his cognitive abilities "every day [in] how he operates and how he thinks."  I’m confused, is that an argument for or against a cognitive test?

    -10:16 AM, 2/28/2024


    Talk about a delicious irony

    One of the strongest arguments for overturning the ruinously large fine on Trump in his New York real estate fraud case is the Eighth Amendment protection against excessive fines. The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in 2019 that that protection does apply to state courts. And one of the strongest arguments for Trump to cite came from liberal icon Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who said:

    “The prohibition embodied in the Excessive Fines Clause carries forward protections found in sources from Magna Carta to the English Bill of Rights to state constitutions from the colonial era to the present day. Protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout Anglo-American history for good reason: Such fines undermine other liberties. They can be used, e.g., to retaliate against or chill the speech of political enemies.”

    I might not have agreed with many of her rulings, but judging from this, there’s no doubt she was psychic.

    - 9:51 AM, 2/28/2024

    Public Service Announcement

    Public service announcement to anyone thinking of donating to Harvard or sending their kids there: The co-chair of Harvard’s anti-Semitism task force resigned Monday because she has no confidence that Harvard will implement any of the task force’s recommendations to stop Jew hatred on campus.

    Related: Stephen Kruiser at PJ Media has a news round-up illustrating how bedbug crazy these pro-Palestine dingbats are and how they “have more vocal cords than brains,” from calling Jerry Seinfeld a “genocide supporter” to literally setting themselves on fire.




    Private School For Me, But Not For Thee

    Two Democrat Governors, Roy Cooper (North Carolina) and Andy Beshear (Kentucky), co-wrote an op-ed for USA Today condemning Republican attempts to give low-income parents vouchers to send their kids to the schools of their choice. They painted this as a racist conspiracy to loot the budgets of our precious public school system and set our schools back for a generation (as if the COVID lockdowns and the focus on woke politics and LGBTQ activism hadn't already set public school students back a generation.) 

    One problem: Both Democrat Governors send their own kids to elite private schools. But that’s okay because, hey, they can afford it.


    The Best People

    President Trump was roundly condemned as a racist and a xenophobe for saying of illegal immigration that other countries were not sending us their best people. So just to clarify, here’s an example of one of those best people that Joe Biden let in.