Latest News

October 27, 2022

A lot of stories have been coming in lately that show how the brave new world of “renewable energy” has been vastly oversold to the public at a very high cost. Here’s a roundup of the latest…

Goldman Sachs economist Jeff Currie reports that over the past 10 years, we've "invested" $3.8 trillion in "renewable energy," and over that time, the amount of energy we consume from fossil fuels has dropped from 82% to 81%.

The Department of Interior announced that it would hold the largest-ever lease sale for wind energy off the coast of Central and Northern California. It would open up more than 373,000 acres of ocean for building off-shore, giant spinning wind turbines. Oh well, the world doesn’t need seabirds anyway.

 Speaking of, in Norway, wind turbines are falling apart because the wind is too strong. Bonus: when they break apart, they leak oil.

For the first time in 35 years, the new conservative government of Greta Thunberg’s native land, Sweden, will have no separate ministry dedicated to the environment. A Minister of Climate and Environment was appointed, but will work under the Minister for Energy, Business and Industry. To be fair, after 35 years of government environmental policies, they probably don’t have enough energy to heat a separate environmental office.

A journalist who was looking into the cost of a replacement battery for an electric Ford Lightning pickup got sticker shock when he discovered a standard 230-mile battery was $28,556.47. If he wanted the “extended range” battery that got 300 miles to a charge, that was $35,960.

But don’t expect those batteries to get any cheaper. A study commissioned by the government of Finland found that while “in theory” there’s enough global reserves of nickel and lithium to make batteries for all vehicles to be electric, there’s not enough cobalt. That’s just for the cars, not for all the other things greens want to be powered by batteries. Also, the car batteries will have to be replaced every 8-10 years. The study’s author said the lack of key resources “suggests the whole EV battery solution may need to be re-thought and a new solution is developed that is not so mineral intensive.”

And not to be a devil’s advocate, but have any of these worshipers of Mother Earth thought about how we’re going to dispose of billions of dangerous worn-out lithium batteries?

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

The Overseas Elections

Very Fine People

Raked over the coals

Plan for action after AG Garland’s contempt of Congress

Comments 1-1 of 1

  • Dallas Gutacker

    10/27/2022 11:05 AM

    As an older Electrical Engineer, I have always said that this is an entire farce from start to finish. There's so much wrong about what they're promoting and what they're not. Our nuclear power plants have been mothballed due to congress giving money towards windmills and solar which made nuclear non-competitive when in fact, it's the most "green" energy there is! We also have not near the infrastructure to charge these vehicles nor are they anywhere close to prime time. Congress passes laws for a lot of things that they know absolutely nothing about. If anything should be pushed, it's hydrogen powered vehicles. There's so much wrong about electric vehicles and all of the environmental damage they create from raw materials to the end of life for them. It's the old adage, if it's not in my back yard, it doesn't exist and the brainwashed public (if you say it often enough it must be true).
    Anyway, I'll end here since I could go on and on about how bad this electric vehicle push is.