June 18, 2018

JUNE 18, 2018

A while back, when everyone was caught up in the debate over whether President Trump should sit down for questioning from Robert Mueller, I suggested a list of questions that Mueller should be asked by Trump.  Now that DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz is about to sit for questioning by congressional committees, I thought I’d be similarly helpful with a list for Congress to use.  Devin Nunes surely doesn’t need my help on this, but, just for fun, here goes...


1.  Soon after Peter Strzok was named head of the FBI’s Trump/Russia probe, he texted Lisa Page that Trump won’t be President and that “we will stop it.”  Did you infer that he meant they’d stop Trump from getting elected, or did you think he might have meant something else, such as, “We will stop meeting for five-hour lunches”?


2.  When some of the Strzok-Page texts were made public, Strzok was demoted and now works in Human Resources.  He also maintains his security clearance.  If his appearance of bias was so detrimental to the FBI that he had to be removed from his job, do you see any irony in the fact that he’s now in Human Resources?  And what about the “appearance” of his continued security clearance?


3.  How did you even get those Strzok-Page texts when the FBI told Congress they were not obtainable?  Did you hire a family of Pakistani IT professionals to hack them?


4.  According to the report, Hillary’s classified emails were obtained by foreign governments and intelligence entities.   How many consecutive life sentences would be given to a submariner whose personal pictures on board his sub were similarly compromised?


5.  Peter Strzok was in charge of the FBI’s investigation of Trump “collusion” for its first nine months. If bias is not to affect the eventual determination by the special counsel --- or the public's perception of that determination--- shouldn’t the work of the team led by Strzok be tossed out?


6.  You say that there is no evidence in your report that anyone’s bias affected the conclusions reached by the FBI.  Question:  Have you read the report?


7.  How did Peter Strzok get the job of lead investigator in the Hillary email case?  Was Hillary herself not available to run it?


8.  Will Strzok finally be fired from the FBI by Christopher Wray, or will he be kept on and offered the exciting new anti-bias “training”?


9.  When “Agent 1” texted “Agent 5” the message “I’m with her,” did you infer that he was talking about Hillary Clinton, or did you think he might have been talking about some other female presidential candidate, such as Carly Fiorina, Geraldine Ferraro or Roseanne Barr?


10.  Why was no recording or transcript made of Hillary’s FBI interview?  Given the large budget for the FBI, couldn’t they have laid in a supply of pens and paper or found just one recording device?  Will there be “training” for office supply managers?


11.  Why was Hillary never asked about Bill’s meeting with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac five days before her interview?  Were investigators simply hesitant to ask her about ANY private meeting Bill had with ANY woman?


12.  If Comey was acting entirely on his own in being “insubordinate” and deciding not to charge Hillary, why was his statement to that effect passed around for editing and tweaking by numerous other FBI officials before she was interviewed?  Do you see this as collusion against Trump or simply a commendable display of teamwork?


13.  As you know, the DOJ and FBI have refused to give Congress key documents related to the FISA applications and spying on Trump campaign associates, even though they’ve been under subpoena for many months.  We know you're looking into that now, so have they given you access to those documents?


Commentary continues below advertisement

14.  If so, have you read them?


15.  Um, what do they say?


16.  Please, can you print us a copy?


17.  If you saw Strzok’s “we’ll stop it” text a month ago, why did you keep it from Congress all this time?  Were you concerned we might somehow conclude Strzok WAS trying to stop it, before we could see from your report that he really wasn’t?


18.  You worked hard on this report, and it is very long.  But its conclusion is so preposterous that even Trey Gowdy has come back to life.  Have you thought about entering one of the healing professions?


19.  Since you have condemned James Comey for “insubordination,” and we know he has lied and leaked to the media, do you think he’s a good star witness in Mueller’s case against Donald Trump, or in any case against anyone at any time?


20.  You wrote, “We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past department practice.”  May we at least conclude from that sentence that the prosecutors might want to plead insanity, as they can't tell right from wrong?


21.  (Bonus question)  When you wrote that sentence, were you high?

MAY 2, 2018


So, the New York Times has published a list of 49 questions purported to be the ones special counsel Robert Mueller wants to ask President Trump. Here is a completely hypothetical response to Mueller that I would dearly love to see from Trump. Here, New York Times:

Dear Mr. Mueller:

I have just seen the long list of questions in the New York Times that are alleged to be from you. Since the Times has occasionally been known to print leaked material that turns out to be incorrect, I don’t know if these really are the questions you intend for me or not. But in case they are, I have to say that they are ridiculously open-ended (Witch Hunt!!) and would take many hours to answer fully, and I kind of have a lot on my plate right now, what with working to end the Korean War, secure the border against an incoming hoard and figure out what to do about those lyin’ Iranians who clearly are on the path to nuclear bombs. I hear you don’t care about this and may want to subpoena me. Before you take that step, though, I have a request: answer this list of just 10 similarly open-ended questions I have for YOU.

1. Do you agree with James Comey’s remark in his interview with George Stephanopoulos that he still doesn’t know if the Steele “dossier” is true?

2. Since the facts in the dossier are “salacious and unverified,” as Comey directly admitted to me, do you think it was right for the FBI to use it before a FISA court to obtain warrants to spy on campaign associates of mine?

Commentary continues below advertisement

3. When Peter Strzok was on your team, did you ever have conversations with him about me? Detail everything you ever discussed with him before, during and after he was on your team, including any mention of the election outcome, texting or insurance policies.

4. Why did you put Andrew Weissmann on your team of lawyers, knowing full well that he has a storied history of withholding exculpatory evidence, even to the point of having a conviction he'd overseen being unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court? Did that make you more or less likely to want him investigating me?

5. What was going through your mind when two of the four innocent men you helped to wrongly incarcerate in Boston died behind bars?

6. Do you agree with the FBI’s decision to interview Hillary Clinton about mishandling classified material without swearing her in or even making a transcript and then letting the “matter” drop, and is that how you intend to handle my case?

7. If you found out that I had deleted about 33,000 emails that you had subpoenaed, would you charge me with obstruction of justice, or would you and your staff work together to craft a memo exonerating me weeks before you had even interviewed me?

Commentary continues below advertisement

8. I realize that lawyers as a group tend to “lean left,” but could you not find any Republicans to put on your team? How hard did you look to find even one person who was just fine with the way the 2016 election turned out?

9. You went to law school --- do you understand that, as President, I have the constitutional authority to fire at will the director of the FBI (which both Republicans and Democrats cited ample reason to do) or the attorney general (which I have refrained from doing, despite the fact that Jeff Sessions is MIA) or the deputy attorney general (who is also still employed, despite raging conflicts of interest that should have prohibited him from appointing you) or even you (which I haven’t done simply because it might be wrongly interpreted as obstruction)?

10. Since the FBI was running a counterintelligence, rather than a criminal, investigation on Russia, do you ever wonder why a special counsel was appointed in the first place? That’s supposed to be for investigating crimes, and there was never any specific crime being investigated, so did you ever stop to think that maybe your job isn’t necessary, appropriate or even legal?

11. (Bonus question) Former FBI Director Comey said this on Monday, after telling an interviewer he thought he’d still be director of the FBI if Hillary had won: “Secretary Clinton is someone deeply enmeshed in the rule of law, respect for institutions, a lawyer, and so given that background, I’m reasonably confident that even though she was unhappy with the decisions the FBI had made, she would not fire the FBI director as a result.” What went through your mind when you heard this, and, if you were taking a drink of coffee, did you do a spit-take?”

There, Mr. Mueller. I realize you’re very busy trying to find obstruction of justice on my part –- even though there’s no justice for me to obstruct, since there’s no underlying crime –- so that’s why I left it at just 10 questions (plus the bonus) for you. Believe me, I can easily come up with more (we hardly even covered Rod Rosenstein), but we can start with these. I look forward to hearing from you.


President Donald J. Trump



Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

Comments 1-25 of 27


    06/22/2018 09:38 AM

    Do you think Weisman should lose his law license?
    How much money did you make off of Uranium One?
    Why would you support a known criminal like Clinton over D. Trump ?
    Do you realize we are close to civil war because you and the left cannot stand the peoples choice for President?
    How does it feel to know the truth about Russian collusion and still try to frame an innocent man? Do you believe Jesus is the Christ and Do you fear GOD ?

  • Linda D Maguire

    06/21/2018 03:15 PM

    Hillary has never been brought to any kind of trial; is there any reason she cannot now be tried for criminal activities that were absolved thru political shenanigans, which were themselves illegal?

  • R K Curtis

    06/20/2018 09:59 PM

    Wow! Great questions indeed! I have a few and they are as follows: Why does Hillary still have clearance? When will (and in no particular order of Importance),Holder, Hillary, Comey, Strzok, Page, Bill, Weissman, McCabe, Aberdeen, Debbie W. Schultz, Lynch, Obama Agent 1, Agent 5 (and anyone else I may have discriminated against) be indicted? Just let me know when you get a chance. Thank you for all you do!

  • R K Curtis

    06/20/2018 09:18 PM

    Wow! Great questions indeed! I want to know the following: Why does Hillary still have clearance? When will (in no particular order of Importance) Holder, Hillary, Comey, Obama, Bill, Strzok, Aberdeen, Page, Weissman, Debbie W. Schultz, Lynch, Agent 1, Agent 5, McCabe, and anyone else I have discriminated against by leaving out be indicted? Just let me know when you get a chance. Thank you so much for all you do.

  • Rebekah Kathleene Curtis

    06/20/2018 08:55 PM

    Wow! Great questions indeed! I want to know the following: Why does Hillary still have clearance? When will (in no particular order of Importance) Holder, Hillary, Comey, Obama, Bill, Strzok, Aberdeen, Page, Weissman, Debbie W. Schultz, Lynch, Agent 1, Agent 5, McCabe, and anyone else I have discriminated against by leaving out be indicted? Just let me know when you get a chance. Thank you so much for all you do.

  • ML Parker

    06/20/2018 11:33 AM

    In any court hearing, would biased jurors be allowed to participate? Or would they be passed over by the prosecutor? What constitutional ground do you have for allowing this to happen? If this bias was discovered to have happened, either by the prosecutor, the judge, or in the jury, would it not constitute a miscarriage of Justice, or a mistrial? Why do you feel your Agency is above common law? Do you feel you or your organization is above the law as opposed to all men are created equal and endowed with these unalienable rights?

  • Jan Draeger

    06/20/2018 09:19 AM

    First, I would like to express my appreciation of your sense of humor and your knowledge. Always fun and informative! Now for my opinions!??

    Mueller is an arrogant individual investigating a president for his own notoriety and self focus! The thing he hadn’t counted on was his Uranium involvement with Hillary being known. Keeping that in mind, he seems confident that his continual WITCH HUNT” is diverting the attention away from Rosenstein and him and any involvement in illegal activities they may have participated in. They seem to protect each other, and celebrate the fact that no “SPECIAL COUNCIL” will be be hired to investigate them. A conflict of interest obviously doesn’t apply to them!

  • Guy Michael Chlupsa

    06/20/2018 07:04 AM

    Thank you, Mr. Huckabee. Mueller requires a Special Counsel investigating all of his law enforcement endeavors.

  • Sheila Cloudcroft

    06/20/2018 04:46 AM

    LOL. It'd be hilarious if it wasn't so real. Particularly the bottom questions from Trump.

    I'd like to ask what Mueller thinks is the reason why witnesses against Hillary and Obama keep turning up dead, and what he (or Congress or the Justice Dept) plans to do about it.

    I'd also like to ask what Congress and the Administration thinks about the non-stop psychological barrage, riots, attacks, shaming, and twisted hatred being levied at not just the Administration but the people who voted for this change because we do not agree with the dissolution of our sovereignty nor with the gangland style society full of licentiousness we were devolving into.

    I'd also like to ask what is going to be done about the grip that radicals have in schools across this land. Radicals pulling Kindergardeners out to protests when parents are not informed, putting peer pressure on children who do not agree with anti-NRA stances, why is nothing being done to protect our children?

    I'd like to know why Jeff Sessions or Secretary Nielsen do nothing while the network of radicals trained by Obama create terror situations for conservatives at public universities, convention centers, and even informal gatherings. Why is domestic terrorism suddenly "okay" provided it involves people who do not want to become part of some merged one world govt.

    Finally, I'd like to know why, in the name of all those who have served, died for, and love this nation, the media is allowed to subject us 24:7 to hatred in every venue there is for our Conservative beliefs and towards our President, and why social media is being allowed to censor our positions like they have while promoting globalist philosophy. This is a total 100% unfair advantage they have by owning all the forms of major communication, and it is TYRANNICAL that they are gagging our free speech and equal access to the public. Why hasn't anyone stopped this?

  • Leonard Pickel

    06/20/2018 02:07 AM

    I wish someone would ask the IG, did Hillary break any laws? When she installed for use a private server to keep her communications from the People? When she deleted emails and destroyed devices that were under subpoena? When she washed her server that was under investigation?

    Bonus: Did you find any evidence that the FBI or DOJ used informants to collect information against any previous candidates or elections, like 2014 for instance?

  • John Hulme

    06/20/2018 12:44 AM

    First, charge all of those people with appropriate crimes such as interfering with an election, dereliction of duty, conspiracy, destruction of evidence, failure to comply with a subpoena,, treason, espionage, obstruction of justice, lying to the FBI, lying to Congress, etc.

  • Bill Brown

    06/19/2018 11:13 PM

    Mr. Mueller, I would like to know the salaries paid to the dozen or so attorneys on your team. Were they chosen at random by you, or did you try to find reasonably priced attorneys so as to lower the tax burden on the American taxpayers? How much more of our tax money do you intend to spend before this expensive fishing expedition if shut down?

  • Marianne Bernard

    06/19/2018 11:01 PM

    You've covered the bases, Mike. Just wondering if Comey should be charged with subornation of perjury? He knew the truth and yet covered up for Hillary and the rest with his inane deceitful excuses for them.

  • Catherine E Manoff

    06/19/2018 10:47 PM

    Delightful questions...Keep them coming!

  • Ed WratherEd

    06/19/2018 10:00 PM

    Love it!! For most of us out in flyover country we have trouble understanding why no one has yet been arrested or sent to prison

  • Jeanee Cates

    06/19/2018 09:34 PM

    You're awesome! ?? Adopt me...

  • Steven Gysler

    06/19/2018 08:46 PM


  • son thach

    06/19/2018 04:00 PM

    Lest get back to the basic what your job expectation ? what FBI mean [from tax payer]

  • Firewagon

    06/19/2018 02:50 PM

    Recent reply to a post I made concerning getting just one of the "prime leaders" of The Clinton Crime Family fitted for their orange jumpsuit: "She is too connected to ever be prosecuted!" Your questions 2 & 4 are VERY relevant. The numb nut FBI whack still has a job & his security clearance, and, as far as I can tell, The Criminal Clinton and several of her staffers still have their clearances! This from Comey: "...could not prove Clinton intended to break the law...." Just like our vaunted SCOTUS, in adding "home" to WHERE We The Serfs could "keep and bear arms," in finding a "Right of individual people," Comey has added "intent" when NONE is required for the laws Clinton broke! A very SIGNIFICANT finding by this milky-toast IG report was declaring that the Clinton email server had been hacked by at least one or more foreign countries! I have LONG maintained that those guys, "went for a walk one night and decided to kill some Americans," POSITIVELY knew how lightly guarded (security personnel reduced from 30 to just 6!), and RIPE for the taking, was an American Ambassador in Benghazi. Forget the now pardoned Sailor for comparison, consider my story: Operation Eagle Claw, on 24 Apr 1980, was the botched attempt to rescue the Iranian hostages that ended in a conflagration in the desert (C-130 & helo fireball). My security clearance was close to that of our incompetent, former (thank God), SecState. You had to have access to a code in order to gain admittance to our offices - locked 24/7! We did the Marine Corps' part of the planning for that operation. There were 8 US servicemen killed & 4 injured and 1 Iranian civilian killed, helicopters abandoned, worse than Benghazi, but barely. I had the responsibility for ensuring ALL classified material was secured and the safe locked at 'end of day.' I recall, on at least two occasions, on I95 heading home, having that cold chill feeling, something like the feeling you might have realizing you have LOST your wallet, only worse; going back to "discount double check" that ABSOLUTELY nothing was left adrift! THE CLINTON COMPARISON: I absolutely KNOW that my family would still be digging under Leavenworth, in their attempt to find out what they had done with me, IF just one "sand flea" (terrorist/soldier) had been present at that conflagration in the desert, AND any piece of classified document had been found, "in the clear," in my LOCKED offices, with just the name of the operation, let alone the staging rendezvous. More likely, being as "tolerant"(NOT) as the Marine Corps is, I would have been facing a firing squad! The FACT these people are still walking around, let alone maintaining ANY security clearance, is FUBAR!! In my Marine vernacular, that F was never referred to as FOULED....except, perhaps, for some of us Southern boys, in mixed company! Forgive the length, Gov, but talk about National Security, was there ANY during that entire 8 year Obananation?? As far as Clinton and all her minions, some already given "immunity," and these FBI seditionists, as my replier to that post indicated, Too Connected, or knows too well where ALL the bodies are hidden, is the WHY only FALL GUYS will fall....

  • Firewagon

    06/19/2018 02:31 PM

    Not sure what happened to a previous comment on your "questions" commentary? There is one somewhat unrelated question that might be asked of Horowitz and/or Mueller: What was the FBI's involvement in a TN election in '08-'09? I think some talking head brought that (fact?) up when commenting that the FBI's involvement in the 2016 election was hardly their "first rodeo." Funny (not) that I have not heard a peep about that since??

  • Ronald J Bangert

    06/19/2018 12:24 PM

    This conspiracy to undermine the integrity of our Nation, redefine our Constitution, Articles, Bill of Rights, etc. has been long in the making. We are in danger of marginalizing our citizens....and all this for a Power Play of No Return. Divide and Conquer has been a theme seen over and over since the 60's, though around frim the foynding if our country, epitomized during the Presidency of B. Obama. Last time I looked, evil from sin did not have a particular skin color nor capitalized by a particular nationality. It is the Human Condition. Yet there remains enemies in the camp, staffers and appointees whose allegiances are to socialist ideals that have slowly crept into the psyches of Americans and fueled un our present woes with smoke and mirrors. These Obama Era appointees should be replaced and the mask of their deceptions unveiled!

    Your questions are spot on as well as your discernment and insights. I appreciate your heart for the Nation.

    Ron Bangert

  • Kendra Strecker

    06/19/2018 12:23 PM

    My comment is this, I AIN'T BUYING THE BULLSHIT that they are trying to sell WE THE PEOPLE!!


  • Rich Abbey

    06/19/2018 10:15 AM

    My question is: I keep hearing that this corruption does not represent the whole FBI..just a few bad actors in charge...Why should I believe that? What evidence exists to show that this bias against the President and the citizens who elected him has not corrupted the entire system of justice in America? Republicans are people too you know.

  • Don Borreson

    06/19/2018 10:13 AM

    Governor / Pastor Huck: I realize you are a very smart guy, and though I have no Mensa IQ, I clearly understand your revelations about the lawlessness and political bias of the IG report. Are the gentlemen on Capitol Hill stupid, gutless, in the pocket of the Deep State, OR ‘All of the above’?

    And seriously, what in the world can we do about it? The Republic is literally at stake!


    06/19/2018 10:07 AM

    Since God, as is known in the bible, has been removed from schools, the public forum, and from some churches, should we be surprised with our break-down in society? No God and a humanist religion means, no truth, no justice, and abuse of power. It makes us have to pray that much harder that God will have mercy on our nation and intervene once again in the affairs of men.