May 15, 2018

The ultra “progressive” leaders of Seattle seem determined to prove that “I’m from the government and I’m here to help you” truly does deserve to rank as the biggest lie of all time.

A few years ago, they voted to “help” low-wage workers by gradually raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour. The added cost to restaurants and other small businesses forced owners to lay people off, reduce hours and delay hiring. A University of Washington study found that costs to low-wage workers outweighed benefits by 3-1, and the average minimum wage worker lost $125 a month. That’s not to mention the loss to customers of businesses that had to close, and the lost tax revenues. Thanks for the "help," guys!

Well, having “helped” small business employees to the unemployment line, Seattle officials are now preparing to do the same favor to employees of large businesses. The City Council just voted unanimously to put a $275-per-worker tax on for-profit businesses with over $20 million in yearly revenues. They claim they need the money to deal with a growing homeless problem (gee, I wonder why a place that offers lots of benefits to the unproductive while punishing those who hire people would have a growing number of homeless residents?) You know what Ronald Reagan said: if you want less of something, you tax it...and they're taxing employment.

Commentary continues below advertisement

Two of the city’s biggest cash cows…sorry, “employers”…are denouncing the move and threatening to relocate to more business-friendly environs. They note that city revenues have nearly doubled since 2010, far outpacing population growth. They say Seattle doesn’t have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem: its leaders spend too much money and spend it too inefficiently.

What sort of cold-hearted capitalists would say such a thing? The notoriously liberal Amazon and Starbucks! Starbucks recently made news by being so cowed by social justice warriors that they’re turning their stores into public bathrooms and hangouts for homeless people who don’t buy anything (we’ll see how well that idea goes over with their paying customers.)

When city officials have veered so far left, they’re threatening to drive Starbucks out of Seattle,’s time to wake up and smell the coffee.



Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

Leave A Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

Comments 1-5 of 5

  • Amelia Little

    05/20/2018 01:25 AM

    A business person from Seattle was saying this tax is going to hurt the small businesses, not so much Amazon and Starbucks. And, that is true, Amazon and Starbucks are big enough entities to just pick up and move on to another city or state. And, perhaps they COULD afford the tax, even if they stayed. But, the smaller business owners and all their relatives and friends need to sit up and take notice and vote out the liberals who are ruining their businesses. They are going to be hurting and cutting number of employees, and possibly services, and some are even going to have to close down--whether Amazon and Starbucks stay or go. Maybe they should go for recall on all those on the council that voted for this tax, instead of waiting til the next elections.

  • Juanita F Greene

    05/17/2018 02:53 AM

    Cost of living always rises when the minimum wage rises. It makes more sense to me to pay your best workers more money
    than rely on a controlled rising wage.

  • Elizabeth Honaker

    05/16/2018 10:48 AM

    Gosh, GEE! The principles of CAPITALISM demolish SOCIALISM!!!! Who woulda THUNK it?

  • Bruce Deming

    05/16/2018 10:02 AM

    They're not taxing employment, they're fining success, in order to cover up the idiocracy, that has become the standard of liberal governance.

  • Marcia S

    05/16/2018 09:47 AM

    Looks like Seattle residents need to wake up and smell the --stench of those "tax-and-spend" city officials - and VOTE them out office.
    Would serve city officials right to see Starbucks and Amazon move out of the city -- but given the political stance of those two entities, maybe the city's move against them to support "social justice" causes is not un-deserved!