November 8, 2019

Today's Edition



Are you getting tired of seeing and hearing the word “whistleblower” in the story about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky? Join the club. I also am tired of having to put quotation marks around the word “whistleblower” when referring to this individual, though I still go out of my way to do it because this “whistleblower” is not an actual whistleblower under any U.S. whistleblower statute.

We’ve already discussed why the person who has already been named by multiple news outlets as Eric Ciaramella (pronounced “CHAR-a-mel-ah,” as in “CHAR-lie”) does not qualify as a whistleblower in this case. Of course, I am not a lawyer, but Gregg Jarrett is, as well as a FOX News legal analyst who has focused an electron microscope on all aspects of the “witch hunt” to the point of even writing a book about it called WITCH HUNT. In a new column, Jarrett explains plainly why this person does not qualify as a whistleblower under any U.S. whistleblower statute, and goes on to tell us why he wouldn’t be entitled to anonymity even if he did.


With gratitude,

Mike Huckabee

Commentary continues below advertisement



Reader comment of the day

By Mike Huckabee

This comment from Janet on government bureaucracies was sparked by our story on why and how Michael Flynn was taken down...

Having worked as a contractor for the federal government, I can easily believe all of what you've said here about the bureaucrats working to oust Flynn. It was obvious to me that, at least at the agency where I worked (USDA), employees didn't have nearly enough work to do and even if they had work to do, they would spend their time taking naps (openly) at their desks, defying their branch chiefs. Then, of course, there was the contracting company that hired me, lying to me about what the job would entail to get me to take it. After a few weeks on the job, I came to the conclusion that not only should there be term limits for elected officials, but for federal employees as well. Five years and out.

From the Gov:

That sounds like a good plan!  And, for the most part, security clearances need to end at that time as well.  In fact, this issue might be something for President Trump to look into during his (yes) second term.  After what he's been through, I don't think it would take much persuading.


Commentary continues below advertisement


I wanted to make sure you also read these comments:

I’ve been chronicling liberal media hypocrisy ever since I launched my radio show “The Huckabee Report” in 2009, and there have been countless examples in the decade since. But seldom has there been such a glaring example than we see today.

On the one hand: the media are flailing Donald Trump Jr. for “revealing” the name of the alleged “whistleblower” whose thirdhand gripes about how the President is doing his job launched Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court impeachment hearings – even though Don Jr. merely retweeted one of many news stories that already includes his name. (Better arrest me, too, since I talked about it days ago. And put out an APB for Schiff as well, since some of the testimony he released inadvertently included the guy’s name.) They’re also stridently insisting that it’s a violation of federal law to say his name, which it most definitely is not. It’s against federal regulations for the Inspector General to reveal his name without just cause, but the rest of us are protected by this thing today’s “journalists” apparently never heard of, called the “First Amendment.”

Their excuse for all this hysteria over not revealing the name that everyone and his dog already knows is that we must protect whistleblowers at all costs.

But on the OTHER hand...on the very same day that we’re hearing all this banana oil about protecting whistleblowers, we learn that CBS has fired the female former ABC employee who allegedly leaked the video of ABC anchor Amy Robach complaining about how her bosses had killed her story exposing Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual crimes and his connections to powerful people like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. Note: ABC not only ferreted out the whistleblower’s identity, they called up CBS to tell them, and she was fired by CBS for exposing what ABC did. Again note: ABC conspired with CBS to out and fire a female whistleblower for exposing ABC’s repression of a female reporter in order to protect America’s worst serial pedophile/sexual predator and his powerful friends.

And yet they’re still lecturing the rest of us on the morality of protecting whistleblowers. The mind reels.

And just as a chaser: ABC claims they spiked the Epstein expose for allegedly not meeting their high journalistic standards...but they had no qualms about airing a credulous interview with Jussie Smollett, allowing him to promote his risible tale of being assaulted by noose-toting Trump supporters at 2 a.m. in sub-zero weather on a street in Chicago.



It’s disappointing but hardly surprising that a federal judge in New York struck down the Trump Administration’s latest rule protecting health care professionals from being forced to perform or refer patients for abortions, sterilizations or medically-assisted suicides if it violated their religious beliefs. This is one of several challenges to the rule that defends basic religious liberty. The sooner it gets to the Supreme Court, the better, and let’s all pray that the SCOTUS understands that the First Amendment was listed first for a reason, while the “rights” to abortion and suicide weren’t included by the Founders at all.


Bible Verse of the Day (KJV)

"What time I am afraid, I will trust in thee."

- Psalm 56:3

Did you miss reading a newsletter recently?  Go to our archive here.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

Comments 1-4 of 4

  • Stephen Russell

    11/08/2019 03:16 PM

    Fed employee term limits:
    1. work 5 years
    2. transfer to other agency of interest
    3. time line on security clearances
    4. One stop security clearance center in DoD?
    5. Online Job testing
    6. Career assements done

  • Lawrence E. Foster

    11/08/2019 11:54 AM

    I'm not sure what to call Ciaramella - but i know what to call his "tall tale" - an Al Goreism. Every one knows an algorythm is a mathematical formula, but as Clinton's VP fades from mind, not everyone remembers what an Al Goreism is. It's a whopper made up for political purposes - as in "I invented the internet".

    True, it could be called a "Kerryism" after John Kerry who started his political career perjuring himself before congress with whoppers about what he "had personally observed" in Vietnam" (Turns out he was never in the places where events wre alleged to have occurred, but fat Teddy Kennedy protected him from prosecution for perjury).

    It could also be called a "Bidenism" - old bloviatin Joe is a fountain of whoppers, but all in all, I like the term "Al Goreism" (perhaps becasue I originated it).

    Won't be long before we forget Gore, Kerry and Biden, as a new crop of "whopper-droppers" make their appearance on the democrat stage.

  • james randolph

    11/08/2019 11:45 AM

    Hey Mike - regarding the DEEP SWAMP DRAINING PROJECT....
    TED NOEL wrote an excellent strategy ... use FOIA to quarantine bureaucratic resistance..
    excerpt: "...When you enter the Everglades, you know you'll find alligators and pythons. You just don't know how many. And no matter where you are, you can see only a few that are close to you. There can be an alligator right under your boat that you never see, because it can stay submerged for half an hour. The snake may be back in its hole. The only way to get them all is to blanket thousands of square miles with millions of hunters..."

  • Lloyd Richardson

    11/08/2019 11:29 AM

    It is also time to stop pretending that there is anything illegal or even "wrong" in a president offering a "quid pro quo" to a foreign leader to expose instances of political corruption by a former high level US government official. Biden and his son clearly violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act along with numerous other US laws. Biden Sr's running for some random US office does not shield him from such investigations--in a sane world, you might even think the muckraking media might actually like to know the results of any such investigations, no matter who conducts them. I mean, gosh, what if the next president of the US were actually a corrupt SOB?! I call this the Tea Pot Dome Standard.