August 17, 2018

California hate crime

Attention, Jim Acosta of CNN:  This is what it actually looks like when someone is subjected to violent repression by an intolerant bully just for exercising his First Amendment right to express a dissenting political view at a public event.  Except the person viciously beaten was a Trump supporter, the alleged attacker was the lead singer of the well-known punk band Social Distortion, and his followers in the crowd whom he’d fired up with his violent political rhetoric bravely held down the person he was beating so he couldn’t defend himself.

Reaction of most authorities in California’s liberal capital, Sacramento: Too bad, you shouldn’t have been where someone was likely to give you a concussion over your political views.  Fortunately, the victim was finally able to find one police officer professional enough to file a report.  Considering the violent, fascistic attack was caught on video, it seems that the next step should be obvious.  But if local police and prosecutors refuse to do their jobs, then the feds have a term for this: “hate crime.” Law-abiding Republicans are watching, and waiting, but not patiently.


Trump-ist language

I’ve said many times that I wish President Trump would think twice before hitting the “Send” button on Twitter.  Even as someone who generally agrees with his policies, I often wince at the unpresidential language (I liken it to the culture shock from the language I encountered as an Arkansas-bred Baptist the first time I visited New York City.)  But if you’re going to criticize Trump’s tweets, at least do it honestly and criticize him for what he actually said.

Example: his recent blast at turncoat former aide Omarosa Manigault Newman in which he referred to her as a “dog.”  I certainly understand his anger, but if he thinks she’s a dog, he should remember that when you lower yourself to get into a dogfight, all you end up with is fleas.  So that was unfortunate enough without some in the media making the stretch that the term dog was racist and/or sexist.  As this link shows, Trump has previously used the word “dog” to describe a number of people he was feuding with, mostly white males, including Mitt Romney, Bill Maher, David Gregory, George Will, rapper Mac Miller, Michael Wolff, David Alexrod and the list goes on and on.  It’s obviously not racist or sexist, it’s just Trump-ist.

In fact, if anyone should be offended at being compared to politicians and media celebrities, it’s dogs.  Why slander dogs?  Harry Truman said if you want a friend in Washington, get a dog, and I assure you he meant a real dog. Dogs are selfless and noble creatures. Trump would have been much better off giving that White House job to an actual dog than to Omarosa.  The dog would have been hard-working, fiercely loyal for life and never bitten the hand that feeds it.  

It also probably would have done a better job.   


Native Americans speak out, Antifa confusion grows

Hey, Social Justice Warriors:  Doesn’t it absolutely fill you with OUTRAGE to hear that Native Americans are still being cruelly oppressed by the white man’s government?  As a representative of the Crow Tribal Council puts it, his people are being subjected to a “cruel nightmare,” in which they have a trillion dollars in wealth under their feet on the reservation, yet they are denied from accessing it while they suffer 70% unemployment and are rendered “starving and destitute.”

I know you’re ready to grab the protest signs and pull on the black Antifa hoods, so let me tell you who’s responsible for the suffering of the Native Americans I just described: the EPA and other liberal officials imposing anti-mining, anti-coal environmental policies.

Well, why are you just standing there looking confused?  Get to protesting the EPA, if you don’t want to have to go on Twitter and call yourselves racists.



Speaking of Native Americans, the great Democratic hope for 2020, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, has introduced the “Accountable Capitalism Act,” her proposed law for “improving” capitalism by injecting a ton of government control over every large company to insure that any profits that actually survive go to the people she thinks should receive them.  In other words: “socialism.” Details at the link.  Maybe her campaign slogan could be “MASA: Make America Stagnant Again!”


 Pointing a gun at Grandma

By now, we’re all used to hearing some mind-bogglingly goofy things from MSNBC guest commentators, but this one gives even John “That press conference was TREASON” Brennan a run for his money.  MSNBC commentator John Heilemann, referring to a poll that claimed 40% of Republicans agreed that President Trump had the power to shut down media outlets that engage in bad behavior, declared that he was “virtually certain” that if asked it in a poll, about 10% of Republicans would say it would be okay for Donald Trump to kill their grandparents.

I suppose you could make the argument that the question was too vague and hypothetical (What if the media outlets were broadcasting classified information? What if the grandparents were terrorists? etc.) But let’s concede that both propositions are absurd. First of all, Trump has never threatened to shut down a media outlet.  For all their talk of him being an autocratic dictator, the media obviously have no fear of criticizing him constantly, which I suspect they would if they actually believed he were an autocratic dictator. Their attempts to conflate criticism of their bias and lack of fact-checking into an attack on free speech and the First Amendment itself sounded familiar, and then I remembered this famous scene from “Animal House”:

It’s also ironic that a liberal should accuse Republicans of being willing to let Trump kill their grandparents, since it’s eerily similar to an analogy that conservative humorist P.J. O’Rourke made years ago to the way liberals are always advocating for higher taxes for one new program or the other.  

O’Rourke explained that if you don’t pay your taxes, the government puts you in prison; and if you try to leave prison, they shoot you. Therefore, all taxes are taken at the threat of a gun. So when someone wants higher taxes to pay for some government program, you have to ask yourself, “Would I let someone put a gun to my grandma’s head and take her money to pay for this?”  Maybe for necessities like national defense you would.  But would you let someone rob your grandmother at gunpoint to pay for his college tuition or his cell phone or his clean heroin syringes?  Not likely.  Yet liberals think taxes should pay for all those things and much, much more. 

Now, tell me again: which side is more likely to be okay with pointing a gun at grandma? 


Commentary continues below advertisement

 Comics discuss politics

Here’s a valuable lesson for young stand-up comics and all the late night “comedians” who think a monologue consists of ranting against Trump or crying about politics instead of telling funny jokes: 

Steve Martin and Martin Short are touring together and still selling out large venues, even though they have both been famous for a combined total of 78 years. How have they remained so successful for so long?  By not doing divisive political material that insults half their fans.    

At the link, the two comics discuss why they avoid politics in their show.  And here’s another lesson for young comics who might be too young to know this: Steve Martin came along in the early 1970s post-Vietnam/Watergate era, after more than a decade of comedians competing to outdo each other as deep “sociopolitical commentators, man.” Sound familiar?  Steve deliberately did the exact opposite; donning nose glasses and an arrow-through-the-head, playing the banjo, being a “wild and crazy guy” and just trying to make people laugh.  Audiences were so desperate for a break from all the self-important political “humor" that he quickly became the hottest comic in America and was playing sold-out sports arenas. 

If I’ve made the conclusion young comics should draw from this too obvious, well, “Excuuuuuuse meeee!”



I have a reputation for being a generally nice guy, so you might think it’s uncharacteristically mean of me when I occasionally refer to the loudmouthed political extremists (on both sides) who use the Internet as an electronic soapbox as pathetic losers who live in their parents’ basements.  Well, at the link is proof that I’m not being mean, I’m just being accurate.  Watch the video of self-proclaimed white supremacist leader Patrick Kessler being interrupted during a live stream broadcast when his dad came into the basement and yelled at him for being a Nazi.

In a recent monologue on my TBN TV show, I urged people to deal with angry Twitter/Facebook attacks by hotheaded keyboard warriors as I do: just say, “Don’t care,” and ignore them.  There are a handful of crackpots on the left and right whose obnoxious ravings are given far too much publicity and weight simply because they put them on the Internet, which – news flash – ANYBODY can do.  If they were yelling their garbage on a street corner, the major media would rightly ignore them.  But let them say something outrageous on Twittter, or claim they’re outraged at something someone else said on Twitter, and it’s treated as actual news.  That gives them the attention and unearned sense of importance they need to fill the gaping holes in their lives and just encourages them to do it more.

Here’s today’s hilarious “Must-See Video” from’s musical humorist Remy, demonstrating how a never-ending stream of phony, Twitter-bred OUTRAGE over nothing has replaced real news on some media outlets.  Personally, this OUTRAGES me!  I think I’ll go tweet about that.


 Canada Andrew?

Follow-up: After New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo blurted out during a speech that America “was never that great,” the state Republican Party sent him a free one-way bus ticket to Canada.  Where were they when Rosie O’Donnell was threatening to move to Canada?


 Strzok update

Here are some of the latest and funniest responses to news that smarmy, adulterous, biased, unprofessional, fired former FBI agent Peter Strzok had already raked in over $350,000 on his GoFundMe page.  But the best response has been around since before the days of P.T. Barnum, to whom it’s often erroneously attributed:  “There’s a sucker born every minute.”


Commentary continues below advertisement

 Strange story

In Alameda County, California, a mysterious Styrofoam-encased box parachuted from the sky and landed in Castro Valley.  Concerned residents called the Highway Patrol, who saw that it had exposed wires, was making a humming noise and was labeled “Dangerous.”  So they called the bomb squad, which blew it up with TNT to be on the safe side.  It turned out the box contained about $1000 worth of scientific equipment that had probably been attached to a balloon by university students to measure upper-air ozone content.  The “Dangerous” label had originally read, “Not Dangerous,” but the “Not” got torn off.

On the plus side, it was one of the rare school science projects that did not blow up all by itself.



 While we wait for the Manafort verdict

As of this writing, the jury is still out.  I refer to the six men and six women tasked with making sense of the Paul Manafort trial and reaching a verdict on whether he deliberately violated tax and banking laws.  Why Robert Mueller’s special counsel team would be spending its time and resources trying a case that has absolutely nothing to do with Russian attempts to influence our elections is a real puzzler –- unless one considers that Mueller’s main focus isn’t Russia but a big American fish; then it makes sense.  Mueller is after the President and he thought a good way to get him...on SOMETHING...was to get Manafort to “flip.”

But Manafort didn’t flip, most likely because he just didn’t have any information to offer.  He was Trump’s campaign manager for several months –- he even made an appearance at that Trump Tower meeting that is looking more and more like a set-up involving Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS –- so if Trump had been “colluding” with Russians, he might have been in a position to know something about it.  But Trump was not colluding with Russians.  (Heck, I was pretty close to his campaign myself during the later months, and I swear I didn’t see Trump talking with Boris and Natasha even once!)  To his credit, Manafort hasn’t tried to spare himself by making stuff up.  He has to know that the whole point of his trial was to get him to do that.  Even the judge knows it.

If the special counsel probe were really about Russia, those investigators would’ve handed off the time-consuming Manafort case to a U.S. attorney, or let the FBI re-file it with all the other old cases they’d decided not to pursue, and then they would have gone after the people who REALLY DID collaborate with foreigners --- including Russians --- to set up then-candidate Trump with false information to help ensure Hillary Clinton would be President.  At this point, enough hard evidence has finally emerged to give us our main cast of characters, much of what they did, and a timeline for it that goes back to early 2016, months before the “official” FBI investigation.  We’ve got thousands of emails, texts and handwritten notes that “go to motive” and reveal a cozy relationship among the players, notably Bruce Ohr, Christopher Steele and Glenn Simpson.  All the evidence supports what we theorized long ago:  that the made-up Christopher Steele “dossier” that was funded by the Clinton campaign was part of a plot used by high-level intelligence officials to make sure Trump wouldn’t be President.  It’s just as obvious as can be.

And Robert Mueller had nothing to do with exposing any of it.

Refreshingly outspoken attorney Joe DiGenova may have hit the nail on the head when he said, “I think what has happened here is Bob Mueller has lost his way.  And he’s been hit in the face with an outrageous set of facts which show that what he is doing is legally irrelevant to what actually happened during the campaign...the Manafort case is a joke.  It is an absolute embarrassment to the Department of Justice.  It should never have been brought.  And, you know, what I think happened to Bob Mueller is he realized that everything he’s done is worthless --- it means nothing, that the big case is the case to frame the President of the United States.  And he won’t touch it.”

There’s not much more to say about the Manafort case until a verdict is announced.  Let’s not even speculate; it’s impossible to predict what a jury will do.  But legal expert Andrew C. McCarthy has made an interesting observation in NATIONAL REVIEW about one major problem with the prosecution’s case:  the dastardly deal made with their “star” witness.

Rick Gates is a sleazy guy.  He could be charged with everything Manafort has been charged with and more.  He actually embezzled from the man he’s now testifying against.  (I think that’s what “adding insult to injury” means.)  The jury knows he got a deal to testify against his partner and essentially has a “get out of jail free” card when his partner could get, oh, 300 years in prison.  And yet in its summation, the prosecution made a point of saying the proof was in the documents, not the witness.

Okay, McCarthy says.  If the documents tell the story, as the prosecutors told the jury, then why did they make that deal with Gates?  Why didn’t they prosecute both men?  What kind of justice is THAT?  Apparently they still needed their extremely disreputable witness to provide one last piece against Manafort:  that he acted willingly, not out of confusion or distraction or for some other reason.  But as McCarthy put it back in March, Mueller is violating Justice Department guidelines by “alleging earth-shattering crimes” and then “cutting a sweetheart deal that shields the defendant from liability for those crimes and from the penalties prescribed by Congress.”

Just one more way the shameless Robert Mueller has overstepped his bounds.  While we wait for the jury, the entire piece will make for interesting reading.



Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

Comments 1-24 of 24

  • Myra Pearson

    08/18/2018 04:35 PM

    Love the coverage! Thanks for your great work!

  • Lloyd Richardson

    08/18/2018 01:06 PM

    Every time I see a Comey or Omarosa type pulling down millions for "kiss and tell" book, I ask why we cannot deal with this problem in the law--and without trampling on the First Amendment. The key point here is that these people are selling--or perhaps "monetizing" is the correct term-- information that they gained in a government job--often wth the benefit of a publicly granted security clearance. They are in other words using the public's information for private gain. Try doing that in any other context. My thought here is that they can write all the books they want, but at the very least they should share the profits with the USG and the taxpayers who funded their "research". To me the only real point of dispute might be how we define "share". In the intellectual property realm, companies are allowd to exploit IP they develop with government funding, but the USG retains ownership of the IP and shares in the the profits. Why not apply the same principle here? Write away, Mr. Blowhard; you will likely need every penny for your legal defense fund. But you only get to keep half the proceeds. Nice, right?

  • Mary K Hamm

    08/18/2018 10:53 AM

    My husband and I are registered Democrats,but we have voted as Republicans for years.We voted for Donald Trump and will probably vote for him again n 2020.My only comment is he needs to tone down the twitter comments.He is President and he is entitled to his views,but I would think not to be shared with the world.Stating facts is ok,but not demeaning folks .As a white, college educated female I don't think the twitter statements help him at all.Please can you or John Kelly talk to him about this.We really appreciate all he has done to help this country,but he isn't doing himself any favors on twitter.Thank you! Kay Hamm

  • Diane C. Rowlands

    08/18/2018 09:48 AM

    in reference to Peter Strozks gomefund. All the money he raised for his lawyers was in the thousands of dollars. One of the comments there is a sucker born every minute. That is for sure. Any one that would give him money after what he did to us Americans and Trump--those people are suckers. They are also very stupid.

  • Rev Sam Martin

    08/18/2018 08:41 AM

    I like your message. You said you read all the comments, right? Do you know why the number 7 is in my mail. Check out my blog at

  • Vickie Fiorentino

    08/18/2018 08:40 AM

    Everyone should cancel their TWITTER accounts on a specified day just to see what TWITTER would do. Someone needs to shut doe the President's account immediately. I personally think he is doing a fine job, but that account is like a mad man and makes him NO different that those who oppose him.

  • April Holthaus

    08/18/2018 08:26 AM

    I read this bit every day. It’s the only news wrap up that makes sense and gives me facts I can believe. Thank you and thank you daughter for her amazing nerves of steel in the “lions den.”

  • Kathleen Bolinger

    08/18/2018 07:16 AM

    thank you for your news and commentary

  • Anne Lofranco/Channon

    08/18/2018 12:21 AM

    Governor....if Trump starts being "nice" like past republicans that tried to aspire to the presidency he'll wind up another mole for the leftist machine. At first I didn't admire him because of his verbosity and tactlessness, but after a year and a half into his presidency I think I understand him.
    If you don't agree with that many politicos that he's trusted that were a bust? They either tried setting him up or were tainted from the start. Presidents don't check backgrounds, they have others they trust do the vetting. The DOJ plotted against him before the election and afterwards....another trust issue. Obama and Hilary set up the entire government for their own pecking with career clones, Trump has trust factors in the entire system of the government...STILL!
    His friends and business associates are under attack by this same government entity and some are turning on him. Recently, one-hundred major newspapers and news bureaus, have orchestrated a major attack against him.... people have learned to hate him, threaten him and his entire family because he's A WHITE ALPHA MALE that wasn't supposed to be elected.
    Now they want him gone anyway they can, from fake votes to violence. I don't care what your concern is with his style, he's never claimed to be a saint.....but for a mortal man...he's done a hell of a lot better than the past three clucks that were in that office already. I say more power to him and "damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead". He'll have my vote anytime. Could you take the heat he's been getting from the start? This treason against the president and the people was initiated long before he took the I.G reports.
    Thank you

  • Floyd Kimmel

    08/17/2018 09:49 PM

    I have a question Rep Ted Lieu on the judiciary committee stated that if Trump pardons Manafort that's an impeachable offense.
    thought a sitting President has the authority to Pardon.

  • Pamela Moreau

    08/17/2018 09:34 PM

    Hi Governor Huckabee;
    I wanted to tell you how I deal with President Trumps tweets. First, I am not on twitter but I don’t think I need to be...I get full coverage. So...I don’t care what he says, how he says it or who it says it to. I believe in everything he’s doing and most of the controversial actions have been proven correct. I’m in with both feet.

  • Ronald Gstine

    08/17/2018 08:39 PM

    Mike if you have ever gone to a northern museum that has articles and pictures from news papers at the tie of Lincoln you know Trump was't the first to be hated by the press. Years ago when we visited some museums I couldn't believe what I saw. Check out the Lincoln museums that are by the places lived.

  • Carolyn Waldrop

    08/17/2018 08:21 PM

    I agree with you..I wish President Trump would tweet more presidentially!

    Your evening newsletters are becoming addictive.

  • Mary Anne Berry

    08/17/2018 08:21 PM

    As I was running errands today, I noticed several Beto O'Rourke signs in the neighborhood...not a single Ted Cruz sign. I live in Abilene, Texas, which is a fairly conservative town, so this caught my attention. As a Republican, my first thought was that we need to get some Cruz signage out...but then it occurred to me that I didn't want anything to happen to my home. It's sad, but the left has made it difficult for conservatives to express any type of belief. I truly believe that if I put a Cruz sign in my yard, harm would come to our home, vehicles, or ourselves. It sounds so cowardly, but as a retired person, it's scary out there! Sigh...times have changed.

  • Michael Galloway

    08/17/2018 08:19 PM

    Kudos to the New York state Republican party sending Governor Andrew Cuomo a free one-way bus ticket to Canada, after Cuomo made a statement that "America was never that great". That slogan should sound familiar . . . wasn't it Obama who made similar statements about America then goes on an apology tour around the world apologizing and diminishing our nation ?
    Now if the rest of the states Republican party would start sending free bus tickets to all the Democrat leaders and others who are so against our country, a free bus or plane ticket to Canada or preferably to countries much farther away, they could raise millions from those who are tired of the Democrat and Democrat Socialist agenda. Just imagine the possibilities for GoFundMe $ used to bus the mainstream media, other anti-American, anti-Trump liberals and others out of the country. Or maybe bake sales, garage sales and other fund raisers for many one way bus or plane tickets out of this country. The possibilities are endless !!!! (sarcasm, well kind of !!!!!!)

  • Tara Souther

    08/17/2018 07:52 PM

    Thanks for keeping the Evening Edition coming. I look forward to it every day.

  • rodney black

    08/17/2018 07:37 PM

    The president donates his pay works hard and sometimes he will mess up but hes not perfect and he believes in god bye the way did you see what happened in arkansas today devil worship. Well ty for today


    08/17/2018 07:35 PM

    Mueller is PURE EVIL and a simpleton Pawn of the One World Communist government.


    08/17/2018 07:32 PM

    Current Thoughts:
    1. Not in favor of President Trump wanting to spend 80+ million on a parade, so many other places where 80 million would be better spent. It would be better if ended the parade idea.

    2. The President needs to sponsor a major National Parks initiative. By transferring more acreage to the National Park system, The President would be picking up more independents and moderate democrats.

    3. We need a commercial showing what entertainers, newscasters, and Dems think President Trump's supporters are like. i.e. "You can smell them in WalMart"-Strzok, "Deplorables"-Clinton, plus many others. We have to keep hammering the message of the elites vs. President Trump Supporters.


    Joel S. Utley
    CPA and Attorney
    P.O. Box 1790
    Sallisaw, OK 74955

  • Jo Gonzalez

    08/17/2018 07:24 PM

    You're a voice for Sanity & Common Sense. Have enjoyed your program on T.V., (the old one) and now, I'm enjoying your commentary, and your new Show on TBN. We need calm, the screeching of the Left is abysmal, and utterly boring us to death. Mueller should be sent a Bill for his debacle, instead, of sticking it to the Taxpayers. Send him the Bill, and then charge him with "Extreme Boredom" and put him in Jail for 300 years. Thanks Mike, for all you do, "Smelly Walmart Shopper".

  • Ron Besse

    08/17/2018 07:16 PM

    The more I read about Newman I am left wondering; is she a plant paid for by someone in the Democratic party. Obviously there is the book but the fact that we have these recordings would indicate a devious plan to try and take Trump down and make a lot of money doing it. If she was recording from the git-go then that was the plan. If recordings started much later then maybe something else was going on. Maybe to get money for a claim of wrongful termination.

  • Stephen Russell

    08/17/2018 07:08 PM

    Manafort judge got death threats in case, somethings up, big time, someone is Upset.
    More ammo to prosecute Clintons??
    Whod gain by death threats to judge for Manafort?
    Favor Remote Juries via 2 way Video feed.Nationwide.

  • Walter Maude

    08/17/2018 07:05 PM

    I assure you that the early 70’s were NOT post Vietnam or Watergate. I spent 1971 in Vietnam and there was nothing POST about it.

  • Sandra Fischer

    08/17/2018 06:59 PM

    I, too, don't just wince at President Trump's choice of words for tweets and speeches, I cringe. It undermines the credible things he is doing and gives the impression that he has no discernment or intelligence when it comes to opening his mouth. So many people base their voting on such perceptions and not on substance and the liberal media love the firestorm he perpetuates. Makes me sad. (If you publish my comments, please do not use my full name)