Moral behavior upsets Democrat Senators

September 18, 2017

Democratic Senators Dianne Feinstein, Dick Durbin and Mazie Hirono have taken a lot of flak for questioning Trump judicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett in a way that implied her Catholic religious beliefs made her unfit for the bench. Feinstein is trying to defuse the criticism, saying that she’s a product of Catholic education and citing the old “some of my best friends are Catholics” excuse, but she insists that some of Barrett’s statements are (brace yourself for the liberal cliché buzzword of the decade) “problematic.”

Here’s an example: In an article on the death penalty in 1998, Barrett wrote, "Judges cannot — nor should they try to — align our legal system with the Church's moral teaching whenever the two diverge. They should, however, conform their own behavior to the Church's standard. Perhaps their good example will have some effect."

I can see how the suggestion that lawyers and judges should have a moral code would be offensive to many liberal politicians. But Barrett was merely saying that in cases where ruling based on law might conflict with their personal views, judges should recuse themselves. Come to think of it, I can see why that would upset liberals, too.

PLEASE LEAVE ME A COMMENT BELOW. I READ THEM.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 1-3 of 3

  • Patricia McIntosh

    09/22/2017 11:20 AM

    Remember how the liberal left responded when Mike Pence would not go to dinner without his wife? I completely understood why. He was removing temptation from his path. A working environment with intelligent and beautiful women and then you add a relaxed atmosphere with possible alcohol. Temptation. He is a moral man and he removed the possibility. Obviously, not every one has a moral code or even understands it!

  • Laura McKenzie

    09/18/2017 04:18 PM

    Liberal men & women in Government jobs should have to take a weekly class in morals!
    #1 item on agenda: Definition of "morals"? (They would be dumbfounded - no clue!)

  • Robert Dunn

    09/18/2017 04:01 PM

    Feinstein asked if the Appointee if she was an Orthodox Catholic or a Catholic. If that is not a test, what is?
    Elections have consequence and for the left to dismiss someone as not qualified based on a Religious test is unconstitutional.

    Dems are condemning Catholics now, saying not worthy for POTUS Appointment. They are so reprobate, they're Whigging out for sure.