A new Liberal plan to save unions

January 27, 2019 |

For many years, one of the most reliable sources of money for the Democratic party was government workers’ unions.  But that suffered a major blow last summer with the landmark Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME.  The Court ruled that it’s a violation of the First Amendment to force non-union government employees to make dues-type payments to a union that uses them to help elect political candidates that the workers don’t support.  Since that ruling, tens of thousands of workers have stopped paying fees to the unions, substantially reducing the amount that union bosses have to spend on electing Democrats.

But when that much money is at stake, someone will always come up with a sneaky way to get around the rules.  One such plan is being laid right now in Oregon, with hopes that if they get away with it there, it can be spread to other liberal states.

Under this plan, instead of forcing workers to pay unions directly, the state or local government would divert some money from their pay into a slush fund that would go to the union.  As the story at the link explains, instead of paying a worker, say, $50,000 and making him give $1000 to the union, the pay for that job would be reduced to $49,000 and the other $1000 would go directly into the union fund. 

There are a lot of problems with this: legal, logistical and (I’m sure this is the least of its creators’ concerns) ethical.  Workers would still, in effect, be seeing what should have been their pay go to political causes they might not support.  Plus, politicians would be giving money to unions that would use the money to reelect the politicians.  When they negotiate contracts, government would represent both labor and management (and nobody would be representing taxpayers.  Or Republicans.) 

You can read more about this shifty grift at the link.  With all the effort that went into concocting this scheme to evade the SCOTUS ruling and the First Amendment, I wonder if anyone ever spent five minutes considering the best way to get workers to want to join a union: represent their interests instead of the Democratic Party’s.



Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

Comments 1-2 of 2

  • Dana Vafiades

    01/27/2019 09:47 PM

    Hello Sir,
    Thank you for bringing this information to your followers.
    I am a government employee in Oregon and I can say I am thoroughly disgusted with the entire liberal agenda. From this Union propping, to pushing legislation to infinge on our 2nd amendment rights by trying to limit our ammunition purchases, Oregon is well on it's way to becoming a communist state similar to California.
    God bless you!
    Dana Vafiades

  • Omer E Hershberger

    01/27/2019 08:12 PM

    So why don't the republicans come up with a better idea then right to work. Why in the world don't they make it legal for workers to go to a law firm in their county. That lawyer could file paper work at that county court house. It could be a bill called in house union workers. The lawyer of that law firm could represent the workers in that building. This would weaken all the huge unions. If local schools were dissatisfied with there unions they could go this route and you would probably see a tsunami all over the country. A bill like this would crash all the huge unions in time for folks would realize there local law firm would represent them a hell of a lot better. Republicans would really see a pick up in votes...…..