Advertisement

Latest News

March 25, 2022
|

Before we get to the big breaking news --- and, yes, it really is the coolest story ever --- there’s also related news out of John Durham’s special counsel probe. In his request for an extended deadline for his production of classified discovery in the case against Igor Danchenko (who provided “dossier” information to Christopher Steele), Durham reveals that he plans to produce a large amount of classified material this coming week.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/john-durham-to-produce-large-volume-of-classified-discovery-in-steele-dossier-source-case

And now, fun times: On March 24, in federal court in Florida, President Trump, represented by the Ticktin Law Group of Florida and Habba Madaio & Associates LLP of New Jersey, sued former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, the DNC and “dossier” author Christopher Steele, along with approximately 30 others involved in the Russia Hoax, for carrying out a plot to “weave a false narrative” that Trump was colluding with Russian actors to win the 2016 election.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21506628-trump-v-clinton

The New York Post was happy to announce it.

https://nypost.com/2022/03/24/trump-sues-hillary-clinton-dnc-over-unthinkable-russia-plot-in-2016-election/

In the document, there’s a long list of names of those being sued, and the cast of characters will be familiar to regular readers of this newsletter, the reporting of John Solomon, and the legal filings of John Durham. We have, in addition to Hillary and Steele, quite a lineup: Michael Sussmann and Marc Elias of Perkins Coie, Debbie Wasserman Schulz, Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Hillary campaign chairman Robby Mook, Hillary communication adviser Phillipe Reines, Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS, Rodney Joffe and Neustar, and many others whose names you’ll recognize. The FBI is also well represented, with Spygate Hall-of-Famers such as James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith (who has already pleaded guilty after being charged with falsifying an official document) and Andrew McCabe. Trump also lists some “fictitious and unknown” persons and entities, to be revealed, I suppose, as Durham continues.

“In the run-up to the 2016 Presidential election,” it says, “Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an unthinkable plot –- one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy.” The plot they created to exploit sensitive data sources to “weave a false narrative” about him was “so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison.”

That is true. As Paragraph 9 says, “In short, the Defendants, blinded by political ambition, orchestrated a malicious conspiracy to disseminate patently false and injurious information about Donald J. Trump and his campaign, all in the hopes of destroying his life, political career and rigging the 2016 Presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton.” The suit goes on to say that when their plan failed and Trump was elected anyway, “the Defendants’ efforts continued unabated, merely shifting their focus to undermining his presidential administration.”

When you have time, perhaps over this weekend, please read through the whole 108-page document --- it makes for highly entertaining and satisfying reading, especially for my readers who are already familiar with the story. (If you know people who haven’t kept up, please share the documentcloud.org link above.) It really kicks in on page 13, with the “Statement of Facts,” which lays out the whole plot step by step. Importantly, it explains the primary motivation for the Hillary campaign, which was summarized by a DNC memo that had been obtained by by an individual using the name Guccifer 2.0, revealing that the DNC, because of Hillary’s own email scandal, needed to “muddy the waters around ethics, transparency, and campaign finance attacks on HRC.”

Leave it to Hillary and the DNC to muddy the waters around ethics and transparency, while they wade right in.

So, how can a public figure who was running for President sue for damages because of what was said about him? The suit makes it clear that “Trump has sustained significant injuries and damages.” To date, he claims that monetary damages to him, his campaign and his organization are in excess of $24 million, not counting “the loss of existing and future business opportunities.” That sounds like a conservative estimate.

“The Plaintiff,” the suit says, “does not claim nor seek any compensation for damage to his reputation, but rather, he seeks damages for the cost of dealing with the legal issues and political issues, which he was required to spend to redress the injurious falsities which were propounded by the Defendants, and all other losses incurred due to the tortious conduct of the Defendants.”

Go to page 60, and –- gotta love this –- you’ll see that Trump is also suing Clinton, the DNC, Sussmann, Elias and Perkins Coie under the RICO statute. “At all relevant times,” the suit says, these defendants “constituted an associated in-fact enterprise” within the meaning of that law, with a clearly delineated, ongoing organizational framework and command structure for carrying out its objectives: the Clinton Campaign and the DNC were at all relevant times mutually controlled by Clinton, who worked in tandem with their joint counsel, Perkins Coie, whose partners, Sussmann and Elias, simultaneously worked as general counsel for the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.”

Trump accuses them of a conspiracy to obstruct justice, saying they “willfully, knowingly, deliberately, and corruptly obstructed, influenced and impeded...the due administration of justice, and/or one or more official proceedings, including, but not limited to, Crossfire Hurricane and/or other investigations by the FBI, the CIA, the IG, and the DOJ.”

The suit goes on to allege a Count II RICO conspiracy, incorporating many more of the defendants, that deals with the time Trump was in office as President. He says that they “knowingly agreed, conspired, and acted in concert for the express purpose of injuring the Plaintiff’s political career and/or impeding his ability to effectively govern through a pattern of racketeering activity.”

The allegations go on and on, through numerous counts of conspiracy to commit malicious prosecution, theft of trade secrets, and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Stored Communications Act. Then, on page 95, it concentrates its ire on Hillary herself and the DNC, alleging that “Hillary was fully aware of the plan and hired and instructed the necessary parties to make it happen.”

Trump demands a jury trial “of all issues so triable.”

According to a story in The Epoch Times, the judge assigned to the case is a Clinton nominee, U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks. Yes, we join you in wondering how that’s going to work. According to the court docket, U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek Maynard may handle some or all of the proceedings. We would think “all.”

We like what Bonchie at RedState.com said: that Trump is “suing everyone and their mother” connected with the Trump-Russia Hoax. Yes, this hoax involved a tremendous number of participants, but that’s one reason why it’s the most stupendous political scandal in our lifetimes. True, we don’t know if he’ll prevail in court, as it’s almost impossible for a public figure to win what essentially is a defamation case, but I have a feeling that’s not the main reason he’s doing this. He’s getting the facts out. This one’s for the history books.

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/03/24/donald-trump-sues-everyone-and-their-mother-over-the-infamous-steele-dossier-n540539

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

More Stories

Democrat ideas

Election interference

“Not This (BLEEP) Again!”

Biden to Morehouse College

Leave A Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 1-10 of 19

  • Nina Fuss

    08/11/2022 10:27 PM

    I hope it has not been thrown out because what's listed on this if it is made public I'll tell you who has been behind the majority of the stuff going on. Lawyer Up people

  • Bill Higie

    03/28/2022 09:12 AM

    This legal entanglement demonstrates, or should demonstrate, just how sloppy an attorney the defendant is. She didn’t learn anything from her Watergate dismissal. When her husband offered his services as a campaign assistant, her group turned him down. The turkeys are coming back to roost.

  • Ed Thompson

    03/28/2022 09:08 AM

    When I first read about this lawsuit filed by President D.Trump I was thinking “good”—finally “something” is happening that will be tangible for us. But ya know what? Why isn’t it the people in charge of law and order in our government going after those people? Sad still that it takes an individual who was directly affected by those people’s actions having to bring charges against them when we have people who are supposed to be watching over the country to protect our democracy from nefarious actions. Praying for the truth.

  • Doyle Pruitt

    03/28/2022 09:02 AM

    Of there is any justice left in the United States Donald Trump should be awarded the maximum amount for damages to his character and to his family. He should be the recipient of all that the Clinton's and all the other people involved have and leave them broke as a lesson to people who would harbour such thought or deeds in the future.

  • Billy Wilson

    03/28/2022 05:15 AM

    Most of America believes that there is no equal justice. We have justice for them and justice for everyone else. Hillary is a criminal that is fully functional in today's political environment. Joe Biden is just as crooked along with his son and yet here he sits as the President. No, I fear there is no hope for America as it started out as a great nation under a great concept and it has degraded to what it is today. Equal justice under the law is a joke. I believe that nothing will come from this lawsuit. It's mostly theater. Goodness! The Judge handling it was appointed by the Clinton's so what do you think?

  • Dana Vincent

    03/28/2022 04:27 AM

    I applaud the effort to bring these folks to justice but the DEEP STATE is very, very deep and this will not only not get any press but will eventually die out through sheer delaying motions. You'd be lucky to get a real court date sometime in 2050! I use to really believe in these agencies and actually wanted to be an F.B.I. man when I was younger. Not any more. I've lost all respect for these agencies and departments of our government. I've lived in Mexico where at least everyone knows the government is corrupt. But to be an American and see the depth of corruption in our own government that totes itself as being so high and mighty, courageous and rightful, is a real big guffaw!

  • Sally Duncan

    03/28/2022 03:03 AM

    I truly pray for Trump to prevail! Hillary, Bill, Obama and the whole cotton-picking mess of them should be jailed for what they did to him and my country! I am sure that won't happen due to the corruption in our government, but it should.

  • Helen Maso

    03/27/2022 10:51 PM

    Go Brandon

  • Biene Vallee

    03/27/2022 08:10 PM

    I just signed up for a year but still get the daily free issue. Can you please fix this? Thank you. :)

  • John Spang

    03/27/2022 08:01 PM

    I think that Trump is trying to use the legal system to legally obtain documents that perhaps the defendants are secreting versus handing over.