Today's Newsletter July 5 Edition

July 5, 2018 |


The message you have just received was delivered by Mike Huckabee and includes advertising powered by PowerInbox.  These ads help bring this newsletter to you free of charge. 

Today's Commentary: We should celebrate the mutual values of the United States and Israel -- Happy Independence Day America -- A terrific piece by Ed Driscoll -- Remind me again why we haven't replaced the IRS with the Fair Tax -- Moral standards are necessary -- Evening Edition - Daily Verse


If you enjoy the newsletter also, please forward it to a friend and tell them they can subscribe for free at


Despite the battles over illegal immigration, and the humanitarian disasters caused by our weak border security, nobody argues that America could ever have become what it is today without immigrants. Even if your ancestors came over on the Mayflower, they still had to take a boat to get here. Even Native Americans had to cross a land bridge at some point way back when.

Americans have a can-do attitude about tackling tough problems because we’re descended from ancestors who had the gumption to say, “There must be a better life than this,” then risk everything to come here and find it. When you hear smug know-it-alls say there’s nothing exceptional about America compared to other countries, remember that America was founded by all the people who were so exceptional, they just had to get the heck out of those other countries.

Of course, there is one other place where people share that spirit that drives them to start a new life, far from everything they’ve known. That’s our ally, Israel. Considering the threat from radical Islam all around it, it’s a wonder that so many people still do move there. But there’s a very important tenet of the Jewish faith called Aliyah, or “ascent.” It refers to the duty of every Jewish person to return to the Holy Land at some point and help to build the nation of Israel.



Mike Huckabee

Commentary continues below advertisement


Happy Independence Day America

By Mike Huckabee

Happy Independence Day, America, and happy 242nd anniversary to history’s greatest experiment in freedom!

Today is when Americans celebrate our freedoms. But sadly, too many of us seem more than willing to trade away our freedoms in exchange for hollow promises of comfort and security. As the great philosopher Joni Mitchell once said, “You don’t know what you’ve got ‘till it’s gone.” That’s why the Founding Fathers took such care to lock our most important rights safely within the First Amendment to the Constitution. It was America’s first “lock box.” There are more freedoms guaranteed in that one short sentence than people in most nations can even dream of. That’s why for centuries now, people from around the world have risked their lives to come to America. The Founders understood that freedom really is that precious.



A terrific piece by Ed Driscoll

By Mike Huckabee

As I watch the remaining leftists rant and scream, and attempt to foment hatred and violence against people who are just trying to dine quietly at restaurants, and yelling the F-word at the Tony Awards and somehow being stunned that this is making them less and less popular with most Americans, I keep thinking of a scene in the movie, “Mars Attacks.”  A belligerent general is struck with a Martian shrink ray, and the tinier he gets, the louder and angrier his threats become, until he’s finally squashed like a bug.  If the rapidly-shrinking left in America doesn’t want to end up with the same fate, they’d better start growing up fast.

At this link, a terrific piece by Ed Driscoll, explaining why it’s embarrassing, insulting and self-aggrandizing for the consequence-free anti-Trump loudmouths to name themselves after the French Resistance and compare Trump to Hitler.  He reminds us of what the genuine Resistance risked and the price they paid for standing up to real Nazis.


Remind me again why we haven't replaced the IRS with the Fair Tax

By Mike Huckabee

It seems as if Congress is always trying to pass some bill that that’s so big, we won’t know what’s in it until it’s the law. And that always works out swell…for the government, not for us.

For instance, in 2015, Congress voted on an 864-page highway funding bill. The Wall Street Journal, which was one of the few media outlets that actually took the time to slog through the whole thing, discovered that buried deep inside it was yet another new power for the Internal Revenue Service (I don’t know how the IRS relates to highways, unless it’s because they treat us like speed bumps, or maybe because some tax rates are highway robbery.)

For some inexplicable reason, the proposed “highway funding bill” gave the State Department the right to revoke or deny your passport if you owed the IRS more than $50,000. Once it was spotted, its backers assured us this would “usually” only apply to Americans with IRS liens on their property, and “likely” wouldn’t hit those who’d made payment arrangements. I don’t know about you, but I’m “usually” not comfortable with giving broad new powers to the IRS on the promise that they “usually” wouldn’t expand them and “likely” wouldn’t abuse them.



Commentary continues below advertisement


Moral standards are necessary

By Mike Huckabee

We hear often these days that society shouldn’t have any absolute moral standards. Imposing standards is oppressive, judgmental and outdated. Like Linus and the Great Pumpkin, it doesn’t matter what we choose to believe, as long as we’re really sincere in believing it. Well, pardon me for pointing it out, but that’s…well, stupid (sorry, Linus!)

There are all sorts of absolute standards to which we adhere. A rock band might be filled with nonconformists, but they can’t each play in whatever key they feel like. You might concede Hannibal Lecter’s sincere belief in cannibalism, but you wouldn’t go to his house for dinner. It seems counter-intuitive, but freedom can’t work unless we all agree to abide by certain basic standards of right and wrong. When we step outside those boundaries, chaos ensues. That can leave a bad taste in your mouth, and I’m not still referring to Hannibal Lecter. I like to illustrate the concept with a story from the days when my own kids were young.

When my son John Mark was only 12, he decided one day to bake a cake. My wife Janet and I returned home and were greeted by our son, proudly offering ol’ dad the first taste. Well, it looked good, and I was already preparing some fatherly praise as I took that first bite. But what came out of my mouth wasn’t words. It was the cake. It was so awful, I had to spit it out. My first thought was that my son was trying to kill me for the insurance.

As soon as my tongue overcame its shock, I asked John Mark if he’d used a recipe. He said he had, and he’d followed it to the letter. Well, except that he didn’t know what a “dash” of salt meant, so he decided a cup of salt should be enough.

Now, my son worked hard on that cake…he had the best of intentions…and he sincerely believed he’d done a good job. But hard work, good intentions and sincere beliefs meant nothing once he decided he could make up his own measurement standards. That’s literally a recipe for disaster.

Freedom can’t exist in a moral vacuum. It makes some people uncomfortable to hear this, but without clear boundaries of right and wrong, the very concept of liberty breaks down. A person might argue that he should be free to look at pictures others find offensive. But if it’s a photo of a child who’s being exploited, then there’s more at stake than just the liberty of the viewer. We’re currently having a big media controversy over whether to separate children from parents who cross the border illegally, but very few people bring up the fact that the parents chose to bring their children along as they knowingly violated federal immigration law.

Self-government can’t mean each of us lives by our own unique set of rules. If that’s how you define liberty, then you’re just going to get less of it. When people live outside the boundaries of a principled and agreed-upon moral code, it always leads to government that’s bigger and more intrusive, just to force people to do the right thing. Not to mention creating an avalanche of lawsuits.

If you think more lawyers and bigger government actually improve society, then I have a delicious cake recipe I’d like to sell you. Then again, no…taking your money for that cake recipe would definitely be morally wrong.


Evening Edition - July 3

By Mike Huckabee

A wrap-up of all the news you might have missed yesterday!


Daily Verse

"We love him, because he first loved us."

-1 John 4:19 - KJV

Did you miss reading a newsletter recently?  Go to our archive here.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

Comments 1-3 of 3

  • Timothy E. Green

    07/05/2018 05:19 PM

    Rumor has it President Trump is considering nominating Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Judge Kavanaugh paved the roadmap Chief Justice John Roberts relied on to declare ObamaCare’s unconstitutional individual mandate was a “tax” and save President Obama’s despised health care law. You might want to check this out. It's on Ron Paul's site.

  • Ruth Forester

    07/05/2018 05:00 PM

    Thank you, again, Governor. I would like to pass along. As the POTUS is holding rallies in the States with upcoming mid-terms, I would comment. Early on, he endorsed Josh Hawley in his bid to oppose Claire McCaskill in the Mo. Senate race. Since, Hawley appears to have been seriously tarnished for his part in the witch hunt against our Gov. Greitens. I am reading online, that most of Mo. support, still, Greitens and fault Hawley for backing the attacks on our Gov. A candidate who is also running, Skype, has written, that as he is meeting Mo. voters in his campaign, the majority are still angry and supportive of Gov. G. That WE will not vote for Hawley! I have already voted via absentee ballot, for another candidate! Just an fyi. Imho, the Mo. liberals/rino's "swamp" won. The current replacement is not likely to make any "waves." :'(

  • Ashley Holtam

    07/05/2018 09:54 AM

    The liberal left and the media (I am repeating myself, as you always say) keeps complaining about the kids separation at the border for all of hours or perhaps days, how about the parents who have lost their kids to illegals killing them? Or how about military folks who have to deploy all the time to keep our country free and safe? I'm sure you have seen all those crying kids being separated from their deploying parents. I tried to capture some photos of this but my computer skills are not up to par with all those snowflakes.