Morning Edition - September 21

September 21, 2020 |

MORNING EDITION

September 21, 2020 

By Mike Huckabee

PRESIDENT AND SENATE NEED TO MOVE ON SCOTUS

If you thought the left had gone insane over the coming election (and its results-be-damned aftermath), you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

With the sudden vacancy on the Supreme Court, they have completely lost their minds. On Sunday, Nancy Pelosi threatened to impeach Trump if he dared to do his constitutional duty and nominate a new justice. She described impeachment as “one of the arrows in our quiver.” Good grief.

Interestingly, in a Sunday evening presser, Sen. Chuck Schumer was joined not by Pelosi but by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, which should tell you who is really running the show among the Democrats.

The media are nuts, too. To cite one of many incendiary comments, Reza Aslan tweeted, “If they even TRY to replace RBG we burn the entire (bleeping) thing down.”

To his credit, President Trump says he’s going to go ahead with his obligation (his word) to make the nomination.

Schumer said, “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new President.” That’s hilarious; we all know what he said in 2016 (the opposite), and what he’d do now if positions were reversed (fill the vacancy immediately).

He knows, of course, that if Trump DOESN’T nominate someone before the election, the chance of us having a “new President” rises exponentially, as nothing would make Trump’s supporters stay home in fury like his failure to do this. Republicans would burn their OWN party to the ground.

Sunday on FOX News’ MEDIABUZZ, I addressed the political reality by citing Harry Reid, recalling that he “blew up the filibuster” on judicial nominees when Republicans had warned it would come back to haunt him. “So,” I said, “when the Republicans have an opportunity to put a Supreme Court justice on, they’re gonna do it, because they have the Senate and they’ve got the White House. I think there’s plenty of, sort of, double-talk going around...Both parties have taken the position that they’re going to do what they CAN do when they’re in power...That’s politics; that’s how it works.”

In an appearance on SUNDAY MORNING FUTURES, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan said that “Trump is “following the historic norm. Nine out of ten times, when the party in the White House is the same party that’s controlling the Senate [NOTE: that is key]...during an election year, you put someone forward, they get confirmed.”

Indeed, in 2016, the WASHINGTON POST noted that “one-third of all U.S. Presidents appointed a Supreme Court Justice in an election year” --- including six lame-duck Presidents!

The critical issue here is getting someone on the Court who will respect the law and the Constitution. But the left has given us a preview of coming attractions on what we can expect from them, as they don't respect the Bill of Rights one whit (a whit being smaller than a coronavirus).

As for Pelosi’s threat to impeach the President (also AG Barr) if Trump moves forward, Jordan said, “I don’t think the American people like to be threatened.”

So at this point, the question isn’t whether Trump will nominate a new justice (he will), but rather if the Senate will vote soon and not wait till after the election. House Judiciary chair Jerrold Nadler also has issued a threat: that if the GOP Senate confirms before the election, but in November it goes Democrat, that'll mean payback time, as Democrats “pack” the Court the way Franklin D. Roosevelt hoped to during his administration.

What should the current Senate do? Delay voting in hopes that Democrats won’t try to pack to Court later if they get the chance? Or stop acting like Charlie Brown does every time Lucy promises not to take away the football if he’ll just kick, and take the doggone vote?

What have we learned, class? It’s simple: NEVER ‘COMPROMISE’ WITH DEMOCRATS. NEVER APPEASE THEM. NEVER BELIEVE THEM. THEY WILL NEVER COMPROMISE WITH REPUBLICANS.

The threat to pack SCOTUS is serious, indeed; that’s why Republicans MUST keep the Senate this November. Mark this, if they take the Senate and have a new President to appoint leftist justices, they’ll pack the Court faster than you can say “Ruth Bader Ginsberg.”

As I said on MEDIABUZZ, Democrats have “walked away from everything the President has laid on the table that they said they wanted: DACA, infrastructure, tax reform, dealing with COVID...They don’t want solutions; they want control.” They detest Trump because he won’t play their game. Senators had better not play it, either.

RedState.com has a great new column about why Republican senators must reject any “grand bargain” on this with Democrats. It sounds a lot like me, so, of course, it’s a must-read.

"Bonchie” says, “...I think it’s one of the dumbest suggestions I’ve ever seen in my life. It’s basically negotiating with a person threatening to blow your brains out with a gun that has no bullets." He means Democrats have no power now on this and don’t know that it would change after the election.

"Further,” he says, the idea that giving into Democrats here will somehow heal the nation’s divide is ludicrous and naive. If the GOP doesn’t replace Ginsburg before the election...the riots won’t stop and Antifa isn’t going away. You cannot fix what ails this nation with political olive branches.”

That the GOP Senate would press forward in this scenario should surprise no one. Mitch McConnell told FOX News’ Bret Baier in February, “If you’re asking me a hypothetical, whether this Republican Senate would confirm a member of the Supreme Court, to a vacancy created this year [before November]...we would fill it.”

Of course, the media will NOT do their duty, which is to report this accurately. There is nothing unconstitutional or unusual about confirming a SCOTUS nominee this close to an election when the President and Senate are of the same party. Doesn’t matter; the media are already saying this is OUTRAGEOUS!! But that's just another lie, another false narrative –- an extremely inflammatory one, but they don’t care.

They’ll do anything to pressure the few reachable Republican Senators to waver.

Steve Hilton, on his FOX News show THE NEXT REVOLUTION, had a spectacular opening monologue about madness from the left that is a must-watch! He says pretty much everything else I’d like to say --- with one glaring exception: he did say the Senate should vote after the election. On the other hand, his guest, Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn, pointed out that the process generally takes about 30 days from nomination to hearings and another 30 days to the vote.

On the OTHER hand --- I’m sounding like Tevye in FIDDLER ON THE ROOF --- there’s something else to consider: we desperately need a full-court to rule on the various election challenges that are inevitable after Nov. 3. That could be the most important consideration of all.

TO LEAVE ME A COMMENT, GO TO MY WEBSITE HERE>>>

RESTORING "HONESTY" TO THE WHITE HOUSE

Restoring “Honesty” to the White House: Joe Biden went to the Constitution Center and told lie after lie about the Constitution, the Supreme Court and his own past statements.

To sum up the major whoppers:

No, Trump did not wait until after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died to demand that Biden release his list of potential SCOTUS nominees. He’s been doing that since he released his own list on September 9th. (Some pundits noted that since Biden has pledged to nominate a woman of color, which restricts his potential candidates to liberal, female, minority, top-level federal judges, his list should be very short and quite easy to compile -- or to guess.)

No, Constitutional norms don’t bar the Senate from confirming a SCOTUS nominee in an election year. That argument against an Obama nominee was called the “Biden rule” in 2016, and Biden insisted that it didn’t exist.

Biden also claimed that the SCOTUS doesn’t meet again until after the election. Its next session starts October 5th.

But to give him credit, Biden did say one thing that’s true: "We can't keep rewriting history, scrambling norms, ignoring our cherished system of checks and balances."

It would have been nice, though, if everything else he says wasn’t an attempt to do just that.

WHY SOME PEOPLE ARE BETTING THERE WILL BE NO DEBATES

On Sunday, after taking a day and a half off, Joe Biden made one 15-minute appearance (with Teleprompter), then left without taking questions. During it, he said this about the COVID-19 (Chinese) coronavirus:

"It's estimated that 200 million people will die probably by the time I finish this talk.”

As Bronson Stocking at Townhall.com notes, this follows previous claims by Biden that 6,114 US military members have died from COVID-19 (real number: 7) and that 150 million Americans have died of gun violence since 2007. It’s actually about 30,000 a year, two-thirds of which are suicides.

It’s possible that some Democrats might have committed suicide before Biden finished speaking, but I doubt the number was 200 million.

NORMALIZING ASSASSINATION

A woman suspected of mailing an envelope of the deadly poison ricin to the White House was arrested on the New York-Canada border. She was reportedly carrying a gun. Ironically, she was captured at the Peace Bridge border crossing. She must be one of those “peaceful protesters” I’ve heard so much about.

Tweet of the Day! On a similar subject, Newt Gingrich reminds all the leftists threatening violence from their keyboards, TV studios, and House podiums that attempting to intimidate, coerce, threaten or punish Senators, their staffs or their families is a felony punishable by 5-to-10 years in jail.

A LIST OF TACTICS 

President Trump says his list of Supreme Court nominees is down to five and he’ll be naming a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg within days. Many Democrats, from political leaders and celebrities down to Twitter keyboard warriors, are ranting that “nothing is off the table” if he and the Senate do their Constitutional duty and vote on that nominee. They’re threatening everything from violence in the streets to expanding and packing the SCOTUS with leftists when they get back into power, both things they were already doing/threatening anyway, but it’s good of them to remind voters of why they should NEVER be put back into power.

All this childish tantrum-throwing prompted some conservative commentators to start making lists of what the left has already done over the past few years, just to see what, if anything, might be left on the table that they haven’t already hurled in their mindless rage. So I decided to compile one, too. Here’s what they’ve already tried:

1. Months of rioting, looting, arson, vandalism and attacks on and even murder of police and innocent citizens in their own cities (they’ve also tried it in a few Republican areas, but that did not go well for them.)

2. Violent assaults against Republican politicians and media figures, including nearly killing Rep. Steve Scalise by shooting up a House GOP charity baseball practice; multiple assaults on Sen. Rand Paul; and attempts to assault all of us who attended Trump’s nomination speech at the White House.

3. Staging a baseless impeachment to try to undo the 2016 election.

4. Staging a Deep State coup to frame Trump and his people and undo the 2016 election. This includes falsifying evidence, perjury, setting perjury traps, sullying the reputations of the FBI and other agencies, and many other assorted offenses against the law, the Constitution and basic decency.

5. Leaking classified information to try to undermine the President.

6. Politicizing the entire news media (includes the media’s credulous promotion of countless anti-Trump books and stories based on anonymous sources refuted by people who were actually there.)

7. Destroying late-night comedy, movies and professional sports with endless leftist propaganda.

8. Shutting down their own economies and public schools, ostensibly because of a virus they baselessly blame on Trump, even when they knew the painful shutdowns weren’t necessary (see “Nashville.”)

9. Mailing deadly ricin to the White House (this comes after years of liberals “normalizing” the idea of assassinating the President.)

10. Setting up the apparatus for mass voter fraud and announcing in advance that they will refuse to accept the results of the election unless they win.

11. And to take their insanity to a whole new level, Antifa jerks smashed up a car that they thought belonged to a “Nazi” (i.e., anyone who disagrees with them), but which actually belonged to one of their own, in total disregard of the fact that there was a poor, terrified dog in the back seat. Put this in the “How low can you go?” category.

And now – after assaults, murders, riots, arson, looting, lying, ripping up the Constitution, assassination attempts and even terrifying a dog -- they’re threatening even worse unless we install them back into power over us and give them a Supreme Court seat that they have no right to fill. I think they’re making the mistake that many toddlers do of thinking that just because the adults have thus far shown remarkable patience and restraint, we’re going to let this public tantrum go on forever and keep rewarding it.

Personally, I sense that many Americans are fed up with the Dr. Spock approach of remaining patient while the child screams his or her lungs out. They’re about ready for the Captain Kirk approach: “I have had…enough…of YOU!” But I hope they express it at the polls by simply kicking them out of office.

PS to number 11 above: If the car owner wasn't really a "Nazi," what was he doing owning a dog? Doesn’t he know that the latest thing that’s “racist” is being white and having a dog? That’s “cultural appropriation,” stolen from the ancient people of color who domesticated wolves! No, I'm serious.

According to this loon, white people should give their dogs to people of color, so they can live in a perfect, non-racist home. It’s obvious, in many ways, that he’s never read Southern humorist Lewis Grizzard. I believe he was the one who observed that dogs are natural racists: a black family’s dog will always bark at a white person and vice versa.

BIBLE VERSE OF THE DAY (KJV)

 



Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

More Stories

Comments 1-17 of 17

  • John baldino

    09/22/2020 09:43 AM

    Excellent newsletter. I am a new recipient and enjoy reading.

  • Steve Spurlock

    09/22/2020 09:18 AM

    Love this quote Governor!
    “I think they’re making the mistake that many toddlers do of thinking that just because the adults have thus far shown remarkable patience and restraint, we’re going to let this public tantrum go on forever and keep rewarding it.“ And I think you’re spot on in your assessment.

  • Renee Kendrick

    09/22/2020 07:33 AM

    Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord: Amos 8:11 KJV

  • tom jeffs

    09/22/2020 07:03 AM

    WHEN WILL WHITE HOUSE INCUMBENT DEMAND THAT HARRIS/BIDEN EMPHATICALLY DEMAND THAT ALL PEACEFUL PROTESTERS GO HOME AT 10PM SO THE POLICE CAN EASILY IDENTIFY THE RIOTERS, LOOTERS, AND ARSONISTS ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

  • Mervyn Sullivan

    09/22/2020 02:01 AM

    Excellent article.

  • Gladys Hizer

    09/21/2020 06:45 PM

    Rush Limbaugh said today on his talk show, that if Ruth Bader Ginsburg had retired during the Obama administration, he could have nominated a replacement. None of this drama would be happening and when I retired at 71+, I knew I would be giving some much younger person a job who needed it worse than I did. I subbed in school libraries until I had to care for my invalid husband. I'm sure Ms. Ginsburg could have used her tremendous talents in political ways and enjoyed the grandchildren as well. My dying wish, by the way, would not be a political one.

  • Firewagon

    09/21/2020 06:04 PM

    "....a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg within days." WHY, "within days?" What part of PPPP (Prior P**S Poor Planning) would it NOT be if any of those on the president's SCOTUS justice replacement has not been vetted to the n'th degree? Name 'her' tonight or at the dawning of tomorrow at the latest!

    In another 'for what it's worth' comment, WHY does it take 60 total days to get someone approved for almost anything in this 'incompetent' government? Are all of these "lawyers" reading, writing, or hearing challenged? There are 100 Senators, give each 15 minutes to make their case for or against, the VOTE can be had in 25 hours, NOT 60 days!! What this 'process' demonstrates is NOT due diligence, it is an extreme WASTE of the taxpayer's time and money, a.k.a. the usual INCOMPETENCE displayed by our vaunted (not) leaders.

  • Stephen Russell

    09/21/2020 05:05 PM

    USSC Nominee hearings:

    Use Zoom Video 2 way & cut down on the BS by Dems alone
    Only way to speed through this vs Kavanaugh hearings
    NO more Games

  • Lynda Grafing

    09/21/2020 03:57 PM

    How can the Republicans now push for the same thing they blocked 4 years ago?
    I realize it is the President’s constitutional right to name a new SC justice. And I was happy they did 4 years ago but now it seems hypocrisy to demand to do it now.

  • Lena Estep Gipson

    09/21/2020 03:34 PM

    Keith Karr is posting hateful, untrue comments about Mike Huckabee. He should be banned.

  • Lucy Moselle Montana

    09/21/2020 03:15 PM

    I agree everything you said is true, Governor Huckabee. The Democrats are EVIL! The Nov election is "GOOD Versus EVIL. We Christians have to pray, pray, pray that GOOD wins and that GOD will save our country.

  • Floyd A Unger

    09/21/2020 03:10 PM

    Thank you. Great list. I have a kitty but I would also like a doggie.

  • Leopoldo R Gutierrez

    09/21/2020 02:52 PM

    The whole thing about the Supreme Court is really ABORTION.
    They want to protect the " reproductive rights" of women and the freedom to do whatever with "their body"
    Mike: I don't have the means but you could please publish these?
    ABORTION= THE PREMEDITATED MURDER OF AN INNOCENT DEFENSELESS HUMAN BEING
    If women want to "protect" their right, we also need to protect the rights of the unborn
    The minute a woman could be self impregnated with no participation of a male, she can do whatever with her body; but once there is another heart beating inside her, that is another person.
    You want choices? , safe sex, adoption, motherhood.

  • Paul Russ

    09/21/2020 02:38 PM

    Gov. Huckabee:

    Your comments please. How to get recalcitrant Republicans Senators like Collins, Murkowski, Romney and possibly Gardner to support a Trump Supreme Court nominee?

    Thanks,

    Paul Russ

  • J Harold Mohler

    09/21/2020 02:34 PM

    I hope and pray that all this talk is just that bloviating talk!

  • Don

    09/21/2020 02:03 PM

    DO NOT vote for a dimm/communist at ANY level (city, county, state, federal, international, outer space)... a few to remember :pelosi, schumer,nadler,schiff,waters,shelia jackson, booker,etc

  • Luanne Kath

    09/21/2020 11:48 AM

    Fantastic newsletter today!