Latest News

July 14, 2022

We interrupt our regularly scheduled Hunter Biden update to bring you this story about Adam Schiff’s latest move in the endless game of chess between Democrats and Republicans. There’s a limit to how much sleaze and oiliness we care to include in any one edition of the newsletter, and Schiff alone puts us at the upper reaches of that, so Hunter will have to wait till tomorrow. Hunter’s getting riper by the day, but he’ll keep a little longer.

Anyway, California Rep. Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee (shudder), wants an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, which the House plans to take up this week. The language would block Congress from oversight of the military and National Guard in some cases of domestic deployment.

This appears to be Schiff’s latest move in anticipation of a GOP win in November. The idea is to preemptively block Republicans from their constitutional power of congressional oversight. That's a big deal. As Tucker Carlson explained Wednesday night, the amendment would hide information collected by the U.S. military for use in congressional investigations. “That would include information about Afghanistan, vaccine mandates, and January 6,” he said.

Tucker cited Ray Epps, a mysterious participant in events relating to January 6, as an example of someone about whom information might be hidden under the authority of this amendment. (He also noted that, by the way, Epps was profiled Wednesday in THE NEW YORK TIMES as a “victim of a Jan. 6 conspiracy theory.” This is bizarre, considering Epps is on video strongly urging people to storm the Capitol building and yet has never been arrested.)

Julie Kelly of AMERICAN GREATNESS --- who literally wrote the book on January 6, called JANUARY 6 --- told Tucker that this amendment “will enable the Department of Defense under Joe Biden to conceal information collected related to, really, anything that the Defense Department has been involved in, especially related to domestic law enforcement which we know is already unlawful.” She called it “very sketchy.” Military experts she’s talked to aren’t sure of all the implications, but knowing Schiff is behind it, she’s naturally wary. “With Adam Schiff’s name attached to it,” she said, it will no doubt be used “to cover up things that the American public deserve to know.”

She cited a report in NEWSWEEK from earlier this year that said military assets were involved in January 6, “even leading up to the events of January 6.” So, what were they doing? “They can’t collect domestic intelligence,” she said, “they can’t...act as local cops or law enforcement.” We know, she said, that the military, including Gen. Mark Milley, were “fully hostile to Donald Trump.”
According to the stunning NEWSWEEK story, "the role played by the military in this highly classified operation is still unknown."
Of Schiff's amendment, Kelly said, “This looks like a way to obscure materials --- documents, records, communications --- from any congressional inquiry. It also relates to ongoing criminal proceedings, which could relate to January 6.”

It’s easy to see how the amendment might be used to hide information involving the federal government’s illegal use of the U.S. military to deal with domestic issues. It’s also easy to imagine Schiff and his cohorts scrambling to cover their tracks, knowing the GOP can’t wait to thoroughly investigate their scruffy hides.

As the WASHINGTON TIMES reports, “The exemption from congressional oversight is narrowly focused on the domestic deployment of troops, but Mr. Schiff’s free pass for the Pentagon could impact a range of oversight from border security to the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.”

“This is the opposite of a good governance and transparency amendment,” said Charles Stimson, deputy director of the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal Judicial Studies and manager of the National Security Law Program at the Heritage Foundation.

“And it really stinks to high heaven.”

He said the measure would block the courts and Congress from oversight of the military, and information collected by the military, if their deployment is deemed in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

We looked it up. A posse comitatus is a group of people mobilized into service –- as in a western movie, by the sheriff –- to suppress lawlessness. The Posse Comitatus Act prevents the use of the U.S. military in civilian law enforcement, “except where expressly authorized by law.” This restriction on the military is an American tradition that has been codified for 143 years. It states: “Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

There’s another, separate statute that applies to the Navy and Marine Corps. The Coast Guard is not under such restriction and is used for maritime law enforcement. Members of the National Guard aren’t typically covered by the Comitatus Act, either, because they usually report to the governor of their state. That means they’re allowed to participate in law enforcement if doing so is consistent with state law. HOWEVER, when the Guard are called into federal service, or “federalized,” they become part of the federal armed forces, which means they are bound by the Posse Comitatus Act until they are returned to state control. For January 6, they were federalized, so this amendment seemingly would apply to them.

The amendment was passed in 2021 by voice vote in Congress, slipping by the Republicans with no opposition at that time, but was later cut from the House-Senate compromise bill that Congress passed in December. Schiff wants to put it back in.

But now, seeing that they’ll likely be in the majority next year and realizing the limitations this amendment would likely impose, congressional Republicans are getting wise to this move by Schiff. The amendment could impact their planned investigations of the surge at the border that’s taken place under Biden, preventing them from interrogating National Guard about unlawful orders they’d been given at the federal level.

As noted above, the amendment might also limit Republicans from looking into the security failures on January 6, 2021. Republicans want to know the circumstances surrounding House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s rejection of help from the National Guard that was offered by Trump two days before the riot.

Indiana Rep. Jim Banks, a Republican on the Armed Services Committee and one of those rejected by Pelosi for her J6 committee, says this is Democrats’ attempt to tie Republicans’ hands in advance of their taking control of the House. “Yes, I’m very concerned about it, and Republicans need to fight back against it in the House and Senate to make sure it doesn’t pass,” he said.

Lauren French, spokesperson for Schiff, says Republican “conspiracy theorists” are misrepresenting this amendment, and that the measure “prevents presidents, of any party, from unlawfully using our nation’s armed forces in a domestic law enforcement capacity against Americans exercising their constitutionally protected rights.” She says it would not deter congressional oversight but would prevent the government from using unlawfully obtained evidence in court.
Personally, I'd say that questioning the motives of Adam Schiff does not make me a conspiracy theorist.  It makes me a realist.



Speaking of investigations, in case you were wondering what John Durham’s been up to lately, he’s been busy preparing for Igor Danchenko’s October trial, the one that focuses on activities surrounding the Steele “dossier,” for which Danchenko was the main source. In breaking news, Durham has asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to issue 30 subpoenas.

Here’s the full story at AMERICAN GREATNESS. We’ll have more details soon. Interestingly, Danchenko’s attorneys are from the firm of Schertler & Oronato, another firm that worked for the Clinton campaign; Durham is asking the court to consider potential conflicts of interest, which look to us to be as huge and fishy-smelling as anything else involving Hillary Clinton.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

The Overseas Elections

Very Fine People

Raked over the coals

Plan for action after AG Garland’s contempt of Congress

Leave A Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

Comments 1-10 of 12

  • Russell Griffin

    07/17/2022 07:04 PM

    Voters soon have the power to kick out these life time Democrats. If voters lack the will to use the power of the vote our culture will continue to despair into a culture of despotism.

  • Pat Kennedy

    07/17/2022 02:40 PM

    And you or others didn't know, Shifty Schiff and his lying bag of Schiff would do this? He needs investigated and ran out of town or imprisoned. His bearing false witness rises to great heights, Jesus I hope you noticed?

  • Deborah Haywood

    07/15/2022 09:26 AM

    Schiff is satan's tool!!!

  • Aelred A.

    07/15/2022 07:09 AM

    Leave it to Schiff, a congressman, to want to limit Congress's authority and oversight. The people govern this country (in theory, and by law) so there should be no limit to its oversight. Schiff just knows what's coming---and the rest of us can't wait!

  • Terry Stephan

    07/14/2022 05:15 PM

    Mike, I hope YOU actually read this..your reputation is getting trashed by the horrible customer service from ordering Relaxium. Read the Better Business Bureau's complaint log. I've experienced it myself; after spending 3-4 HOURS over a period of about 5 days, I've yet to get a response or talk to a human. I'm sick of hearing your voice and the bumper music until it hangs up on me - 203-292-0376.

  • Rita Bruton

    07/14/2022 02:27 PM

    Shiff. A pitiful person who will have to answer for his own untruthfulness. In the meantime I pray he can't do MORE damage than already done with his lies and hate for America. Someone in DC must find a way to stop and expose him (and a few others I could name). This just makes me feel better to express to someone who believes the same as I do.

  • Jacqueline Ceccorulli

    07/14/2022 01:35 PM

    Hi Mike, Had some friends over yesterday and I mentioned how I personally believe Soros and Obama are secretly running the country. One of them asked "are you sure about Soros? There's been a lot in the press about him but when was the last time anyone actually SAW him? Is he even alive?" Got me thinking about that. Very interesting. Care to comment or confirm? Thanks.

  • Carol Wadley

    07/14/2022 01:34 PM

    Seems to me an awful lot “slips” by the Republicans in these proposed Democrat bills when Republicans should be going over them with a fine tooth comb. Republicans could and should put a stop to this long tradition of Democrats “slipping” unrelated items into bills; and for Pete’s sake, if the Democratic house votes on a bill in the middle of the night not giving Republicans a chance to read it before approving it, vote NO!

  • Steve Florkey

    07/14/2022 12:55 PM

    I still don't understand why Mark Milley has not been tried for treason based on his clear support of the CCP over then-president Donald Trump.

  • abe froemann

    07/14/2022 12:25 PM

    WHY doesn't some honest leader(s) with a brain put together what's necessary to arrest all demo/RINO TRAITORS and get them behind bars where they can't do any more damage to America. Then go after globalist organizations/persons such as the WEF. We are obviously under attack.