May 29, 2019

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is miffed at the New York Times for allegedly not doing its job as a loyal lapdog for the left, which includes always painting conservatives in the worst possible light and using photos of them taken only in mid-sneeze.  The story is about former Trump aide Hope Hicks allegedly wrestling with the “existential question” of whether to comply with a House subpoena.  AOC attacked the paper both for story and its photo of Hicks, which she claimed was a “glamor shot” of someone who’s “considering participating in a cover-up led by the President.”


Wow, so much wrong on so many levels.  First, there is no “cover-up.”  All of these officials have already given countless hours of testimony to Robert Mueller’s team, who found no crimes.  And the very people who were screaming “cover-up” last week are now screaming like stuck pigs because Trump allowed the Attorney General to declassify any and all secret documents to find out what the investigators were up to. 


Second, as the linked op-ed points out, the Times article is 22 paragraphs of conjecture and fake news because Hicks never talked to them about whether she was wrestling with an existential question, an alligator or anything else. 

Commentary continues below advertisement

Finally, what isn’t mentioned here, but what I’m sure “Huckabee” contributor Laura Ainsworth would notice (she’s written about these hyper-consumer-driven women's magazines inexplicably pushing socialism before): One of the biggest boosters of AOC is Glamour magazine, which writes regular fawning articles about her, all illustrated with beautiful glamor shots of her, and I haven’t heard her complain yet.


Here are a couple of examples of Glamour’s hard-hitting political headlines about AOC:


“Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Wore a Cape to the 2019 State of the Union - A Congressional Superhero” and “What Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Hoop Earrings Mean to Latina Women Like Me.”  Here are a lot more, in case you want to start off your week feeling a little queasy.


The moral is that she who lives in a glass house whose walls are lined with glamor shots shouldn’t throw stones. 


Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

Leave A Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

Comments 1-2 of 2

  • Richard Krick

    05/29/2019 06:05 PM

    I received this email about AOC's Green New Deal and would like to fact check it but got no hit on Snoops.. Please fact check it for me before I keep circulating it.

    How many coal plants are there in the world today?
    Green New Deal???

    The EU has 468 - building 27 more... Total 495

    Turkey has 56 - building 93 more... Total 149

    South Africa has 79 - building 24 more... Total 103

    India has 589 - building 446 more... Total 1036

    Philippines has 19 - building 60 more... Total 79

    South Korea has 58 - building 26 more... Total 84

    Japan has 90 - building 45 more... Total 135

    China has 2,363 - building 1,171 more... Total 3,534

    That’s 5,615 projected coal powered plants in just
    8 countries.

    USA has 15 - building 0 more...Total 15

    And Democrat politicians with their "green new deal”
    want to shut down those 15 plants in order to "save”
    the planet.

    Because you could not get many Republicans off the
    sofa last November, the Socialist party now runs the
    U.S. House Of Representatives.

    “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is
    for good men to do nothing.”

    This is EXCELLENT!! I knew the rough idea about
    the number of coal plants, but had not yet seen
    actual numbers until now.

    This makes the point. Whatever the USA does or
    doesn’t do won’t make a Tinker’s Dam regarding CO2
    unless the rest of the world – especially China and
    India – does reduce coal-fired power plants, too.

    The whole “global warming” and “climate change”
    gambits by Democrats are to create a *supposedly*
    sound, scientific basis to justify a federal government
    power-grab and the passage of MORE laws to increase
    taxes and increased control of the privately owned
    power industry and its distribution. Never forget
    the *main* motivation they have!

    “Oh, we will SAVE the planet!!” 100% Pure [email protected]#$!

  • Beth Hay

    05/29/2019 09:36 AM

    Glamour shots of AOC? They can do anything with a camera these days, huh? I never get why people decorate the ugliest part of their anatomy, like her giant mouth covered with bright red lipstick.