FBI agent Peter Strzok actually did show up for his public hearing Thursday before the House Judiciary and Oversight committees.  (Lisa Page’s attorney says she will go in for her closed-door hearing tomorrow.)  The immediate take-away from Strzok’s interview is that the Democrats are so terrified of questions being answered that expose the FBI’s activities, they’re willing to create just about the craziest scene ever witnessed in such a hearing.  And that’s saying a lot.

It was just insane –- not just on the Democratic side, either, but mostly.  It’s going to take me hours to pull my slack jaw off the floor and make some sense out of this mess.  In the meantime, I’ll just let you know that I was absolutely correct in my prediction of what Strzok would say to weasel out of his most infamous text:  “We’ll stop it.”  (“We” doesn’t mean Strzok, Page and/or the patriots at the FBI --- it means “the American people.”  I am not kidding; he wants us to buy that.)

 



As I write this, the questioning of Strzok is still going on.  Stay tuned for my new list of questions for Strzok, the follow-up questions.  Purely rhetorical, of course, because the row of FBI attorneys sitting behind him would surely instruct him not to answer, much as he would LOVE to, of course.  Certainly anything involving Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr and/or Fusion GPS would send them all into a huddle of ridiculous length and seriousness.

So for now, we’ll just start with Question 1:  Mr. Strzok, if, as you say, you feel frustrated over not being allowed to answer questions that you would LOVE to answer, why are you boasting that happy little cat-that-ate-the-canary grin?

 

https://www.westernjournal.com/gowdy-asks-strzok-first-question-then-all-hell-breaks-loose/

 

LEAVE ME A COMMENT BY CLICKING HERE.  I READ THEM!

More Stories

Judge Kavanaugh update: the real and the fake

Free speech works both ways

Comments 1-12 of 12

  • Ken Hydinger

    07/14/2018 09:54 AM

    Governor H. Can you please explain to me how Strzok says his bias did not influence his actions while he was writing the Hillary exoneration letter a month before her interrogation occurred? If this is not an biased action I don't know what is?

  • Lynda Schwemmer

    07/13/2018 05:58 PM

    When you see how arrogant, protected and deeply entrenched they are, it makes you wonder if we will ever see justice for Strzok and his comrades. We want our country back!

  • Barbara Schuyler

    07/13/2018 03:09 PM

    I love reading your comments on the news - it certainly puts a humorous slant on all the crazy things happening in our country. Your questions for Peter Strzock are especially entertaining. Probably he wouldn't "be allowed" to answer any of them either. What an absolute waste of the committee's time. It's no wonder Trey Gowdy is pursuing other interests. We'll be sad to see him go - we really need people like him to at least try to keep our government from crashing and burning. Trump can't do it alone!

  • Robert Eric Graham

    07/13/2018 12:54 PM

    This madness is precictable! We in America are at a cross roads and it is going to take a miracle from God to get through this without violence. A current Rassmusen Poll says 31% of Americans feel there will be Civil War in the next five years. The reason is that the left has A world view that does not include God. The right has a Jadeo/Christian world view. When half the country forgets about God we in the other half have problems. Remember God's judgement fell on believing Jews and non believing Jews in the Old Testament, they all went into exile. I believe that we will be deemed powerless because of internal fighting. That is why we are not mentioned in the end times prophecy.

  • Rob Jensen

    07/13/2018 12:47 PM

    Just for the record, I am not included in Strzok's reference to “the American people” who wanted to "stop it" … but wait! I am an American, and therefore he referenced me when he included "the American people". Do I need to file suit, or sit in a Congressional hearing to exclude ME from that broad reference??? To tell you the truth, I'm shocked he would even want ME, a conservative, Christian, Republican to be included in his group!!! :-)

  • Leonard Lugo

    07/13/2018 11:55 AM

    Indeed, each covers for the other. The Democrats, I call them the wicked, resist to resist, and fill in the blank later....."darkness hates the Light, " the wicked serve Satan, and hate,Biblical values,! As God works through President Trump, the battle will get brutal! God will protect. The heathen rage,and,sadly, turn violent. We are praying for him, you.

  • Leonard Lugo

    07/13/2018 11:53 AM

    Indeed, each covers for the other. The Democrats, I call them the wicked, resist to resist, and fill in the blank later....."darkness hates the Light, " the wicked serve Satan, and hate,Biblical values,! As God works through President Trump, the battle will get brutal! God will protect. The heathen rage,and,sadly, turn violent. We are praying for him, you.

  • BJ Melton

    07/13/2018 11:47 AM

    Thought for the day July 13, 2018


    On the lighter side

    This being Friday the 13th, it might be bad luck

    to get too serious about anything or anybody.

    There was a circus in town yesterday. There were elephants

    snorting, jackasses braying, and clowns cavorting,

    all trying to get in Ring one at the same time.

    Unorganized chaos. Our Congress on public display.

    Peter Strzok appeared before a Congressional

    Committee yesterday. He was there to answer

    questions about his promise and guarantee to stop

    Trump from being elected President.

    It was a funny day. Republicans asked pointed questions

    about the subject. Democrats talked about every

    thing BUT the subject. Most questions he did not answer.

    A few he did answer, but with double talk.

    When something 'touchy' showed up, Democrats

    would interrupt, talk, shout, and generally be despicably rude.

    Anything to bog down the proceeding and keep any thing

    from being accomplished.

    In short, they exposed their 'real' classy self, for all America to see.

    It was wonderful. I had to laugh, watching them show

    everybody what a bunch of unfunny clowns they are.

    I had a real belly laugh when Strzok said he was "NOT BIASED".

    The bias list is long. One his best statements was when he said

    "Hillary will beat Trump 100,000,000 votes to Zero".

    No bias there!

    You don't want to know how much it cost 'us' to learn nothing

    yesterday, except we have more jackasses in Congress than

    we realized.

    The swamp runs deep!

    Sic 'em Donald!!!

  • Sega

    07/13/2018 11:33 AM

    Strzok told Trey Gowdy he knew exactly why he was fired by Mueller and it was not for bias. However later he said he did not know why he was fired. So which is it?

    Another example of Strzok contradicting himself ..

    Strzok confirmed under questioning by Rep. Gary Palmer, R-Ala., that he was being investigated by the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), but was not aware of whether the DOJ watchdog also was reviewing his conduct. OPR previously reviewed former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's performance and recommended his termination.

    But earlier in the hearing, Strzok had told Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., "I am not aware of any investigation of which I am a target."

    He was a hostile witness who constantly gave different answers while under oath, he should be held in contempt for lying under oath!

    Actions speak louder than words, they failed to follow procedure by not putting Hillary under oath or recording her testimony. He also did not follow procedure be verifying that dossier before getting a FISA warrant. He was clearly doing his own agenda to get the results he wanted. His actions SCREAM BIAS!!

  • Richard Gremillion

    07/13/2018 11:27 AM

    One Congressman had him dead to rights, and then missed the shot. He was questioning Strzok on the 5/4/16 text that he sent right after Cruz dropped out of the race, and it was clear that Trump would be the nominee. Page, his mistress, wrote, "And holy sh-t Cruz just dropped out of the race. It’s going to be a Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable." Strzok responded (after a short exchange), "Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE...." MYE is the code name for the Clinton Email Investigation.

    The question that the Congressman should have asked was, "What changed that prompted you to say 'Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE?'"

    The only and obvious answer is that Trump's nomination was the only change. Therefore, we have the proof that Trump's nomination entered into Strzok's decision making on the unrelated MYE investigation (or matter, as it was later called.) Ergo, we have proof that Strzok's personal opinions were indeed influencing his decision making on the MYE investigation, introducing bias.

  • Karen A Armstrong

    07/13/2018 10:53 AM

    After watching him play act and pretend all afternoon yesterday, at one point I thought he would break into a rendition of 'Yankee Doodle Dandy' with flags waving and the Democrats singing back up, I (as well as the others watching) thought this was the best possible thing the he and his fellow Dems could have done. I stood alone as one of two conservatives in my offices, now I believe eyes were truly opened, Trump will have every single vote next election. Had the Dems at least pretended they were concerned for the welfare of our countries security, had they asked any real questions pertaining to this hearing, had they not played his lawyer, then so many who were still loyal to this party would still be voting Dem come election time. But they made it so clear they were not interested in time lines, lies, or corruption in this top official of the FBI that now President Trump will have more votes than ever. I stood amazed not only at his amused smirk, and absolute disregard of the questions, how is it even possible. And the fact it was being aired without Miss Page present absolutely shows they were coordinating their efforts to be on the same page. He was there to show her how to respond when its her turn. She should have been kept in a sound proof room until she was questioned after him that same day. I am utterly amazed at the depths of corruption our country has fallen into. Its so scary to watch someone sit there and lie so easily, so casually, and not even blink an eye. But on the other side, Dems who were becoming skeptical of their party, who were teetering on decisions to stay or leave, well that was the answer they were looking for, that performance sealed the deal. To have them clapping for a treasonous member of the FBI, to have them stop the questioning every step of the way instead of questioning him themselves shows the depth of dirty they have fallen to. It was sad at best. At the same time, every person in my dept, if they had doubt no longer do. They won't necessary be voting Republican, but they are voting Trump. So maybe a thank you card should be sent to the Democratic party, that performance (and they had a chance to redeem themselves during that hearing) absolutely made up minds here.

  • Karen Bollmeier

    07/12/2018 09:47 PM

    I find it interesting that he doesn’t remember making certain inflammatory text messages but in the next breath he does remember what he meant by them, and it’s definitely not what we think he meant.