Return to Impeachment

September 23, 2020 |

I mentioned elsewhere that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was pressed on whether she would use impeachment to try to block President Trump from appointing a replacement for Justice Ginsburg. She replied that the Constitution requires that Congress “use every arrow in our quiver.” (Actually, it doesn’t. Also, her claim that Trump and his “henchmen” have threatened not to accept the results of the election applies much more accurately to her and her “henchpersons.”)

You can always tell that Pelosi is lying when she starts citing the Constitution, a piece of paper for which she has as much regard as a roll of Charmin. I guess she’s forgotten this bit of recent history, so let me remind her:

The House ALREADY impeached Trump on ridiculous, unconstitutional grounds. The Senate threw it out. Even if (God forbid) the Dems win the Senate, there’s no way they’re winning two-thirds of it, which would be required for removing Trump. And if (again, God forbid) Biden is elected, Trump would be gone anyway.

So the threat of impeachment is pure hot gas. It’s already proven so ineffective that Democrats were too embarrassed even to bring it up at their convention. As a weapon against Trump, it would be the equivalent of those people in movies who fire revolvers at Godzilla.

(Incidentally, did anyone else notice how Speaker Pelosi inexplicably wished “Good morning” to George Stephanopolous, 6-1/2 minutes into their interview? Joe Biden had better keep wearing that mask because whatever he has must be contagious. Yes, this is real.)

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 1-7 of 7

  • Ron Turrey

    09/26/2020 08:36 PM

    She and others failed the first time. So what's new her middle name is failed policy's.

  • Art Lee

    09/26/2020 02:20 AM

    Governor, I enjoy your videos...

    I would like to suggest a topic that no one has discussed concerning our upcoming election. If memory serves, the Dems won back the house with so many of their commitments to not blindly vote with Pelosi and to work with the “other side” for the betterment of the country. Why isn’t anyone calling them out and reminding the public of this betrayal? Continue the good work! Cheers!

  • Judy Skinner

    09/25/2020 10:05 PM

    We have had enough of the drunk mad woman. Can't the Dem's do any better.

  • Paul Calahan

    09/24/2020 05:45 PM

    I’d like to think that at some point this is going to backfire on the Democrats. That said, when talking to my liberal friends, they’re convinced that Trump is corrupt and just as sold out on their position as are conservatives. Comes down to the next 40 days making your case to the undecided. Trump spot on yesterday, regardless who wins, the other side will contest and this election is heading to the Supreme Court. We won’t know who won for several days/few weeks after this election. That aside, have never seen in all my years a country so divided and bitter. Middle ground is gone.

  • Ozell Williams

    09/23/2020 03:58 PM

    The Democrats’ shenanigans to delay a replacement for Deceased Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg: Article ii, Section 2, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, negates the existence of any cause to delay replacing Justice Ginsberg. The following is an excerpt that reads as follows: “The President of The United States shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS)”, etc. The word "Shall", is a de facto mandate for President Trump to orchestrate a timely replacement for Justice Ginsberg; despite reports she wished her replacement would not be appointed until after the upcoming election. However, that all-powerful word "Shall" negates her wish, if true, and any other cause to circumvent POTUS Trump's mandate. That pesky little word renders Team Schumer/Pelosi’s tactics to delay the appointment, hoping in vain that Joe Biden wins the election, a waste of time. They certainly know the meaning of “shall”; however, they think we do not know. They need to be reminded that it negates any attempt to impeaching him for meeting that mandate.

  • Ozell Williams

    09/23/2020 03:08 PM

    Article ii, Section 2, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, negates the existence of any cause to delay the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The following is an excerpt that reads as follows: “The President of The United States shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS)”, etc. The word "Shall", is a de facto mandate for President Donald Trump to orchestrate a timely replacement for Justice Ginsberg; despite reports she wished her replacement would not be appointed until after the upcoming election. However, that all-powerful word "Shall" negates any attempt to circumvent POTUS Trump's mandate. And it certainly negates any cause to impeach him for meeting that mandate. That pesky little word renders Team Schumer/Pelosi’s efforts to delay the appointment are a waste of time; hoping in vain that Joe Biden wins the election.

  • Colleen Brown

    09/23/2020 10:39 AM

    I don't understand why our president can't impeach Nasty Nancy?? She is unfit to carry on her roll???!!!