June 20, 2018


The message you have just received was delivered by Mike Huckabee and includes advertising powered by PowerInbox.  These ads help bring this newsletter to you free of charge. 

Today's Commentary: Horowitz hearing was Tuesday's REAL news story -- Good advice from Hollywood -- Obamacare nightmare -- Comey under investigation -- Democrats rush again -- Evening Edition - Daily Verse

Help kickoff our June fundraising drive.  Help us elect Christian candidates from the State House to the White House.  Men and women like Pastor Mark Harris of North Carolina who won his primary this week against a well-funded Republican incumbent.  Support Huck PAC with a donation today. DONATE HERE


If you enjoy the newsletter also, please forward it to a friend and tell them they can subscribe for free at


Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) couldn’t have planned it better.  They kept Tuesday’s news cycle focused hysterically on child immigration –- you’d never know that kids were separated at the border from their illegal immigrant parents while Obama was President –- while the real news was being made in the House committee hearings with Inspector General Michael Horowitz.


I know I’ve called Trey Gowdy a “pod person” in recent days.  Seriously, it was the most descriptive term I could come up with.  But the release of the IG report, which paints in its 568 pages a disturbing picture of anti-Trump bias coloring the FBI’s investigation of Hillary’s email case, has jolted him back to real life.  His questioning of Horowitz was magnificent.


Here's just one example from Gowdy:  "They pre-judged the outcome of the Hillary Clinton investigation before the investigation ended, and these exact same FBI agents and attorneys pre-judged the outcome of the Russia investigation before it even began.  If (that) is not evidence of outcome-determinative bias, for the life of me I don't know what would be."


In contrast, Democrats in these hearings keep trying to push the narrative that Comey’s October letter to Congress kept Hillary out of the White House.  Never mind that Comey hated Trump and certainly didn’t want to hurt his opponent in any way.  This appears to have been a hail-Mary attempt by Comey to help Hillary when the Weiner laptop story couldn’t be contained any longer.  Most importantly, if she had been prosecuted in July for mishandling classified material and obstructing justice as she should have been, the point of the October letter would be moot, because she would no longer have been a candidate for the White House –- only the Big House.  Hillary lost the election because she is Hillary, so it would be really nice if Democrats would just put a sock in it.


Committee Republicans have obviously had enough of this blather and were in top form on Tuesday.  Most of us didn’t see it, though –- every channel was showing crying children.  So let’s play some catch-up on the FBI story.


After the release of the report, Peter Strzok was reportedly escorted out of the FBI building in Washington DC on Friday.  According to his lawyer, Aitan Goelman, he’s still employed and is just going away while the FBI conducts its “ongoing internal proceedings.”  Seems to me they’ve had plenty of time for all the internal proceedings they should ever need, pre-firing, but that’s the line.


And now, just for fun, I’m going to give you the text of Goelman’s unintentionally hilarious statement, picked apart line-by-line by me.  (The part in total caps is me.)


“Pete has steadfastly played by the rules and respected the process, and yet he continues to be the target of unfounded personal attacks, political games and inappropriate information leaks.”  (JUDGING BY HIS TEXTS, PETE WAS READY TO USE THE RULES AND THE PROCESS TO “STOP” TRUMP, YET HE STILL COLLECTS A PAYCHECK FROM THE FBI.  AND THE BIGGEST TARGET OF PERSONAL ATTACKS, POLITICAL GAMES AND INFORMATION LEAKS HAS BEEN TRUMP HIMSELF.)


“All of this seriously calls into question the impartiality of the disciplinary process, which now appears to be tainted by political influence.”  (SERIOUSLY??  WELL, WE CALL INTO QUESTION STRZOK’S IMPARTIALITY, WHICH APPEARS TO BE TAINTED BY POLITICAL INFLUENCE.)


“Instead of publicly calling for a long-serving FBI agent to be summarily fired, politicians should allow the disciplinary process to play out free from political pressure.”  (IN STRZOK’S CASE, IT’S ONLY POLITICAL PRESSURE THAT HAS LED TO ANY DISCIPLINARY PROCESS AT ALL.)


“Our leaders and the public should be very concerned with how readily such influence has been allowed to undermine due process and the legal protections owed to someone who has served his country for so long.”  (STRZOK HAS BEEN EMPLOYED AT THE FBI DURING THE YEAR-AND-A-HALF IT TOOK TO GET THE IG’S REPORT.  AND HE’S STILL EMPLOYED.  THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE CONCERNED WITH HOW HARD IT IS TO FIRE SOMEONE WHO REALLY DESERVES FIRING.)


“Pete Strzok and the American people deserve better.”  (YOU'RE HALF RIGHT:  THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DESERVE BETTER THAN PETER STRZOK..)


So much for Goelman’s statement.  As for Tuesday’s questioning of Horowitz that most people didn’t see, at least the questions and answers are now on the record.  The charge that Peter Strzok was leading a sham investigation into Hillary and an “insurance-policy” investigation into Trump was made quite dramatically.  Horowitz was in no position to refute it; all he could really say was that the matter was “still under review.”


Mike Huckabee


Good advice from Hollywood

By Mike Huckabee

Now here’s something you don’t see every day, and by that I mean, “ever.”  At a Hollywood awards show – and perhaps the most decadent of them all, the MTV Video Awards – “Jurassic Park” and “Guardians of the Galaxy” star Chris Pratt used his acceptance speech to make a personal statement.  But Pratt is openly and outspokenly Christian, and he made a speech filled with good advice for the younger generation.  Look upon Chris Pratt, Robert DeNiro, and learn how to behave like a role model in public.


Obamacare nightmare

By Mike Huckabee

If you thought that the battle over Obamacare was over, guess again.  Like Freddy in the “Nightmare on Elm Street” movies, it just keeps staggering on, no matter how many knives and harpoons get stuck into it.  It’s now likely to end up back in the Supreme Court for yet another pass at deciding whether or not it’s constitutional.  The reason is that the original ruling allowing it was based on defining the mandate that forced Americans to buy insurance as a “tax.”  Texas is arguing that with that provision now gone, the only thing that made it constitutional is gone, so the whole thing should be scrapped.  Will the SCOTUS agree this time and finally end it, or pull another last minute rationale out of thin air and give us “Nightmare on Elm Street, Part 22: Obamacare Lives (Barely)!”?


It’s a complicated issue, and if you’re interested, the link has more on the case and arguments.  The short version: when you cobble a 2000-page bill together behind closed doors and bend every rule to force it through Congress on a party-line vote, don’t be surprised if your dream bill becomes a walking nightmare.


Comey under investigation

By Mike Huckabee

Now, there’s a switch: the Senate questioning of IG Michael Horowitz revealed that former FBI Director James Comey is under investigation for mishandling of classified documents for his admitted leaking of his memos about President Trump.  But no problem: I’m sure it wasn’t illegal as long as he didn’t INTEND to leak them to the New York Times.


Commentary continues below advertisement


Democrats rush again

By Mike Huckabee


Something to remember about the party that gave you the "Affordable Care Act," before you consider returning them to power over writing laws: they are really lousy at it.


In a typical rush to pass a law while at peak emotion, every last Democrat in the Senate has signed on to co-sponsor Diane Feinstein’s “Keep Families Together Act.”  As with most such bills, it has the kind of title that nobody could argue with (“How can you vote against keeping families together, you beast?!”) 


The problem: it’s so sloppily written that it wouldn’t just keep authorities from separating children from parents who are trying to cross the border illegally.  It would also keep children in the custody of parents who commit just about any federal crime anywhere.  Authorities would be faced with a choice of arresting dangerous criminals along with their children or not arresting them at all.  I assume the Democratic solution to this will be an amendment funding the building of government daycare centers at federal prisons. 


Evening Edition - June 19

By Mike Huckabee

A wrap-up of all the news you might have missed yesterday!


Daily Verse

"But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed."

 - James 1:6

Did you miss reading a newsletter recently?  Go to our archive here.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

Comments 1-1 of 1

  • Helen Tritt

    06/20/2018 04:48 PM

    Hello Mike, thank you for your newsletter which I enjoy very much. I saw the Congressional Hearings that Congressman Gowdy, Senator Lindsay Graham GRILLING Mr. Horowitz, and they really hit the target in both instances. In fact, I believe they hit with BOTH BARRELS, which I was happy to see them taking a hard stance on a serious situation that desperately calls for RESOLUTION. I hope they continue with more hearings between weasels Comey, Rosenstein and whomever else. They DESERVE THE HARD QUESTIONS AND BE MADE TO ANSWER WITH THE CORRECT ONES. No more tooth fairy stories or anything else that is UNBELIEVABLE. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!