Late Tuesday morning, there was breaking news in the Paul Manafort trial: the jurors gave a note to Judge T. S. Ellis asking what happens with the “final verdict” if they can’t reach a decision on “a single count.” It’s not clear what that means. Presumably the judge understands, but we don’t really know. Are the jurors in agreement on all counts but one, on some counts but not others, or are they hopelessly deadlocked and can’t agree on even a single one?
This case is extremely complicated, with prosecutors failing to supply jurors with a handy summary of the 18 charges and the documentary evidence for each charge when they presented their side, even though they reportedly had prepared one That would have made the jurors' examination of the evidence a lot easier. During deliberations, the jurors asked the judge for this, and he refused their request at that point. So they may simply need more time to go through everything and piece it together, count by count.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE: Media petitions Judge in Manafort case to unseal jurors names
Also, it’s unknown what other factors might enter into their decisions, such as the sweetheart plea deal Rick Gates got after doing essentially the same things as Manafort allegedly has done, and even more. To some, this would inevitably taint any guilty verdict. But Manafort had the misfortune of being Trump's campaign manager for several months.
Of course, by the time you read this, we may have a verdict on all counts. Or a partial verdict. Or a hung jury.