Latest News

January 20, 2022

As we watch the DOJ launch investigations of concerned parents and 2020 election skeptics with the pretext of countering “domestic terrorism,” it’s easy to see how facile they are at creating issues essentially out of thin air. They do it over and over. Another example of this –- evident in President Biden’s Wednesday press conference –- is the fiction that Republicans, in their opposition to the so-called “voter rights” bill, are trying to suppress the minority vote. That is a detestable lie, made up out of whole cloth, but Biden just keeps saying it, anyway. He’ll say it as long as he and his advisers think he’s getting something out of it.

The Democrats have a singular talent for whipping up huge, complex narratives out of nothing, waving their magic wand to get the media obsessed with them, and keeping them going for years. It’s a make-work program for DC lawyers, keeping their political opponents busy fighting in court, and maintains for the public whatever fiction they choose to tell. They illustrate the accuracy of the statement that if you tell a lie often enough, it becomes the truth. That’s why many in our country actually believe that millions of Trump supporters are white supremacists and dirty Jim Crow-style segregationists. Just turn on MSNBC to hear that idiotic lie.

But there has never been a bigger and more consequential example of this flair for fiction than the Russia Hoax.

While President Biden has been busy this year failing to live up to even the lowest of expectations –- though he brags that he has exceeded them –- Special Counsel John Durham has been quietly looking into the origin of that Biggest of Big Lies, the lie that actually turned into an attempted coup against a sitting President. Aaron Mate at RealClear Communications has just written an excellent commentary that compares the unsatisfactory investigation completed by “Justice” Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz two years ago with the broader probe headed by Durham. The Special Counsel really is getting to the heart of just how ridiculously flimsy the “evidence” was that the FBI exploited to start spying on Trump’s people.

Horowitz, in his report of December 2019, faulted the FBI for its handling of the Russia probe but still, unbelievably, concluded that it was launched in good faith. If that seems laughable now (and it sure does), keep in mind that Horowitz was only conducting an internal investigation, so he was limited to speaking with “Justice” Department employees. That meant Hillary’s campaign and some of their most notorious helpers were essentially out of his reach.

His report taught us a hard lesson, too, about internal investigations in general. When departments investigate themselves, they tend to cut themselves a ridiculous amount of slack. (See “Capitol Hill Police Lt. Michael Byrd.”) In fact, to reach his conclusion Horowitz had to essentially disregard evidence that was included in his own report.

The media loved that conclusion, though, and danced with delight. As Mate tells it, “Horowitz’ report, wrote Mother Jones reporter (and early Steele media contact) David Corn, ‘concluded that the Trump-Russia contacts had been legitimately launched,’ thereby proving that ‘there was no hoax.’”

But we know differently today –- that they used fake information in the unverified “dossier” to launch the probe and later get their spy warrants. So the question is, who is ultimately responsible for the creation of that work of fiction?

“As he documents the role of Hillary Clinton’s campaign in generating false allegations of Trump-Russia collusion,” Mate writes, “Special Counsel John Durham has also previewed a challenge to the FBI’s claims about how and why its counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign began. At stake is the official reckoning within the U.S. government over the Russiagate scandal --- and whether there will be an accounting commensurate with the offense: the abuse of the nation’s highest law enforcement and intelligence powers to damage an opposition political candidate turned president, at the behest of his opponent from the governing party he defeated.”

Horowitz criticized the FBI for using the Steele memos --- taken together, the “dossier” --- but took them at their word that they didn’t use them to actually open Crossfire Hurricane. They had other evidence, he said, that met the “low threshold” needed for opening an investigation.

Recall that when his report came out, we were scratching our heads over that conclusion. How could there be a low threshold for opening an investigation on a major-party candidate RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT? That was not something to be undertaken lightly. It seemed that, if anything, there should have been a higher-than-normal threshold for the FBI to get involved in something that political.

But apparently Durham was scratching his head over it, too. When it came out, he announced that his office had “advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication [reason] and how the FBI case was opened.” And because Durham’s was not just an internal investigation, it was “not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department” and has instead obtained “information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside the U.S.”

The story about Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos telling Australian diplomat Alexander Downer that the Russians had political dirt on Hillary was so flimsy that it couldn’t have been the pretext for an investigation, as the FBI claimed it was. Besides, we know they got the names Paul Manafort, Carter Page and Mike Flynn, who were all investigated, right out of the “dossier.” And while the FBI investigators claimed they didn’t see it until mid-September of 2016, we know that some at the FBI had seen “dossier” material prior to opening Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016.

In fact, Christopher Steele, working on behalf of the Clinton campaign through Fusion GPS, first contacted someone with the FBI on July 5, three weeks before Crossfire Hurricane was opened. That was Michael Gaeta, a senior FBI agent he had worked with before and who was now working as a legal attache in Rome. Gaeta was excited to receive a copy of Steele’s “report” and quickly passed it along to eager colleagues.

Interestingly, Mate reports that before Gaeta took off for London to meet with Steele, he got the approval for his trip from Victoria Nuland, who then worked in the State Department and is now Biden’s Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. Those at the State Department who saw a few pages of what Steele had given Gaeta said, “This needs to go to the FBI.”

It’s hard to know why Horowitz took the FBI’s word when they said they didn’t use the unverified “dossier” to open their investigation, when he’d documented so many of their other lies. Mate outlines these under the subhead, “On Steele, a Pattern of FBI ‘Factual Misstatements and Omissions.’”

The Bureau has already been caught relying on Clinton-funded disinformation and lying about that. It could get a lot worse. Mate anticipates that Durham is in his “final months” of the investigation and is honing in on his ultimate targets.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

The Overseas Elections

Very Fine People

Raked over the coals

Plan for action after AG Garland’s contempt of Congress

Comments 1-10 of 17

  • Nancy Hanbury

    01/22/2022 11:49 AM

    I continue to pray for John Durham and all his staff to not grow weary or fearful as they dig far and deep for truth. I pray for their safety, courage and diligence to keep going to a final, real, truth-filled conclusion. Americans haven't forgot the evil, deceit, lies and greed that started this whole thing. Please continue!

  • Nancy Ryan

    01/21/2022 09:05 AM

    Why can we not pursue decertifying the election with full force as more and more States show fraudulent votes? We should not need to survive another three years of destruction of our free country under a Biden tyranny when he was not the legally elected President by the people. Just wondering.

  • tom jeffs

    01/21/2022 06:10 AM

    Leave me a comment, I read them.

    NOT SURE ANYMORE MIKE ? ? ? ? ? ? ? this used to be all caps ! ! ! ! ! ! !

    when will you start using your Nashville platform to ask questions Mike ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

    for instance, will you thank Harry Reid on behalf of conservatives for being so short-sighted that DJT45 was able to appoint THREE supreme court justices AND lots of appellate court judges because Harry Reid blew up the 60 vote requirement to allow 51 vote approvals ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

    the lesson there is to Chuck Schumer to beware of what you ask for because you just might get it as he tries to blow up the filibuster rules - - - - - - - -

  • Margie Nichols

    01/20/2022 05:08 PM

    How is the "Russian Hoax" not worse than Watergate? Dems didn't like being spied on, but it seems to be their own game. Maybe Nixon was on the right path back then - not that I think it was right. It just seems to me there are people involved in this hoax against Trump that need to spend some prison time and that includes Hillary Clinton.

  • Ed Thompson

    01/20/2022 04:45 PM

    Big Lie/ Russia Hoax— biggest?? Not in my book, but definitely a whopper of epic proportions. And if I may add, repercussions around for any Republican who ever even smiled at President Donald Trump. But for me, the bigger lie is sitting there, in my and your White House, posing as a President, while America is going down the drain every day. To put it more dramatically, and frankly, I’m scared! One year in and unless a person is actually living under a rock, we have a problem. Three more years??? Seriously??? My electric bill is fifty dollars more a month now than this time last year. Gasoline prices are worse than ever. Groceries are about fifty dollars more per order than a year ago. This is one year of Joe can do it better?? Three more years like this one and I will be broke trying to make it through a week, let alone the month! And I only get one “paycheck” a month and right now it ain’t stretch’n too far. We gotta eat, we gotta heat the house, we gotta drive to town, we gotta pay bills for everything and Joe seems to be oblivious to the people who actually are citizens of America and gives away everything to illegal trespassers, sending them my tax dollars while my cost of living is going through the roof! Three more years??? Calling him the President is a bigger lie than Russia hoaxes, and he is doing so much harm to real Americans than anything the Russians could accomplish short of actually invading us. Three more years? No hard working American is going to have a good time as long as Joe keeps doing what he is doing. Lazy people might but I believe that there’s more people who want to actually work for a living than sit around with their hands out waiting for Joe to put something in it! Three more years and there won’t be anything left for anyone!

  • Bruce Deming

    01/20/2022 04:20 PM

    Biggest Lie? I don't think so. The biggest lie is the genocide being carried out right in plain sight by our own government and fulfilling the words written on the Georgia guide stones. UN agenda 21 is being carried out, while we let the media push for the vax and the government create mandates and politicians who say they took the vax, push for more vaccination, all the while knowing that what they received was only saline. Athletes dropping dead if front of audiences from heart attacks caused by spike proteins attacking heart cells one at a time until they're aren't enough to support respiration. The old dying of brain bleeds because of spike proteins destroying the blood vessels in the brain. Women sterilized by spike proteins attacking their reproductive organs. And now children dropping dead from from taking the vax. Yes it happened in Portugal yesterday to a six year old. The spike proteins also destroy the immune system, which is why 75% of new cases are from fully vaxed people. When will we wake up and end this genocide?

  • Daryl Worley

    01/20/2022 04:09 PM

    No, the 2020 Presidential Election is the biggest lie so far.

  • Patricia Gilliam

    01/20/2022 03:38 PM

    Why can’t the whole January 6 th incident just be considered a “ minor incursion” and be done with it?

  • Rosemary Sotok

    01/20/2022 03:21 PM

    I read the entire article on the Durham report. Mind boggling!!

  • Kathleen Riley

    01/20/2022 03:15 PM

    I fear that when Durham's report finally comes out, the Dems will label it "old, tired, and irrelevant". And we cannot trust the FBI nor the Justice Department. So who will make the arrests?