Americans keep trying to tell Hollywood that they have adopted a bad business model by constantly insulting at least half their potential audience, but they just don’t seem to be getting the message (an odd Achilles heel for people who are supposedly in the communications business). You’d think that the cratering of the Oscar ratings might have been a big enough hammer on the cranium to get their attention, but does anyone doubt that next year’s Oscars will again feature lots of leftwing preening and anti-Trump snark, a gaggle of “transgressive” art house nominees that nobody paid to see, and most likely a TV audience smaller than test patterns used to pull?

But if TV ratings don’t get the message across, maybe money will talk for us, or the lack of money, anyway. Over the weekend, the much-hyped fantasy blockbuster “A Wrinkle in Time” opened. It had a $103 million budget, a big name cast that includes Oprah Winfrey and Reese Witherspoon, and it was based on a beloved children’s book. Plus, it got lots of fawning advance publicity for being directed by Ava DuVernay, an African-American woman best known for message movies such as “Selma” and “13th,” which compared the modern prison system to slavery. Yet, it pulled in just $33 million in its opening US weekend, and only $6.3 million at the foreign box office. Those numbers are likely harbingers of a disastrous flop. Why?

Commentary continues below advertisement

A number of conservative critics are noting that the movie makers made a major, very deliberate change from the book that may have alienated its generations of fans. Author Madeline L’Engle was a deeply spiritual person who made Christianity a central theme of her book, filling it with references to the Bible, God and Jesus and quotes from Scripture. The new movie jettisons almost all of that, replacing it with references to liberal social justice heroes such as Nelson Mandela and the kind of self-centered New Age beliefs currently popular in Hollywood.

It’s not surprising that it stars Oprah Winfrey, since replacing God with “The Universe” and moral leaders with gobbledygook about “forces of light,” and promoting self-empowerment instead of spiritual growth, made some critics feel as if they were sitting through a two-hour episode of Oprah’s talk show with CGI effects. There’s already a movie about someone who thought he was God: in “The Ruling Class,” Peter O’Toole played an insane aristocrat who noticed that he was talking to himself when he prayed, so he decided he was Jesus. That was a black comedy (and did I mention, his character was insane?); but hey, it’s as valid a belief system as thinking you’re the center of the universe.

Commentary continues below advertisement

If Hollywood wants to reverse its popularity death spiral, I’d offer a friendly suggestion that they stop preaching to the converted (or more like preaching to the unconverted and insulting the converted). Maybe consider returning to the old, profitable days when studio heads looked at Middle American Christians as their target audience instead of their target. Failing that, they could try praying for these audience-insulting movies to make more money. But since they’ve replaced God with self-worship, I’m not sure that praying to themselves is going to do much good.




More Stories

"A Wrinkle in Time" the movie

The Oscars

Comments 1-5 of 163

  • Milton Meyers

    03/17/2018 02:55 PM

    Gov. Huckabee. Thank you. I am going to start reading your posts. I heard you were a smart conservative and a good man.

  • Arlene V. Klocek

    03/17/2018 02:39 PM

    Thanks Gov. Huckabee for your information.
    We are so bombarded with drivel from the media, it's good to read truth.
    God Bless you a abundantly.

  • Stacey L. Shallenbarger

    03/17/2018 02:17 PM

    God bless you Mr. Huckabee for speaking the Truth from the platform God has given you! Praise to those in the industry with the courage to produce the faith based movies our families enjoy So Much! God is on the Throne!

  • Curt Locklear

    03/17/2018 02:13 PM

    Spot on as usual. Having taught A Wrinkle in Time in my English classes, and taken my students to a live play that was correctly portrayed per d'Engle's version, I do not even watch the ads for it. The ultra-ultra anti-family, anti-decency folks who put out this travesty of a movie need to be ostracized from movies until the wake up and smell the coffee. Maybe we need to wrinkle time back or forward to a better time

  • Ruth Burke

    03/17/2018 02:10 PM

    I was very disappointed in the 2018 version of Wrinkle. It made unnecessary changes and omissions in the basic story. The twins were left out, Mrs. Murray and Meg were African American, Charles Wallace was adopted, plus Camazotz and Central Central Intelligence was completely changed. There were many more changes, but Ill go back to the book and the 2003 version of the movie. Disney made the movie a disappointment !!!