Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 1-1 of 1

  • Amelia Little

    12/22/2019 02:32 PM

    That's telling. We have to address the problems that got Donald Trump elected in the first place. Well, yes, and since election, he has been addressing those problems fabulously. If Yang or any of the others think the way to address these problems is by free everything for all, open borders for all, tearing down current buildings and rebuild with green stuff (is this kind of along the solyndra lines?) they've got a rude awakening.

    He is actually more rational than all the other candidates (I notice he also is not a career politician which, IMO, put one mark on the pro column for him) but, while he isn't obsesses with impeachment, either he is so busy campaigning or he turned of his listening ears, because there was NO QUID PRO QUO. He seems to think there was. So, the mark on the pro column gets cancelled out by this mark on the negative column.

    AS LONG AS HE ISN'T HELL BENT ON FREE-FOR-ALL EVERYTHING (or, anything really) I guess his imposing a tax in order for each of us to get $1000 a year, our taxes would still be miniscule compared to what the others propose. But, if he's for part of their major schemes---no thanks! That is, unless my taxes raise by $1000 per year, then that is stupid.