Trump Budget Breakdown

March 20, 2017

Here is a breakdown of President Trump’s proposed budget that’s making steam shoot out of ears all over Washington. True to his word, he is calling for increases to some agencies, such as Defense and Veterans Affairs, deep cuts to many others and the complete elimination of a number of programs, including the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities. It’s the kind of budget that’s sure to meet fierce opposition even among some Republicans (I support Trump, but I think that eliminating the NEA would be a tragic mistake. While I was among the first to criticize some of the controversial grants to individual artists that it made in the past, the community arts programs that it currently funds help countless children, seed creativity in many fields, and support the arts industry that generates many billions more in tax dollars than the NEA costs.)

The thing to remember is that Presidents’ budgets are never simply rubber-stamped by Congress (Obama’s budgets were unanimously rejected by both Houses.) They just serve as a blueprint for what the President wants, but the final result never reflects exactly that. So Trump decided not to be timid in laying down his priorities. This is his opening bid for the deal negotiation, but he knows the starting point is never where we end up. I’d be very surprised if the final budget is anywhere near this. But if Congress passes a budget at all, at least that will be an improvement over much of the Obama years.


Abuse of Power

March 7, 2017

The Must-Read Article of the Day that everyone’s talking about: Andrew C. McCarthy at National Review argues that the whole “Trump’s people colluded with the Russians to ‘hack’ the election” nonsense is crumbling before our eyes as Democrats frantically backpedal away from it, knowing that it could be replaced by a far bigger scandal involving the Obama Administration’s abuse of power to spy on political opponents. It was a great distraction and a way to hamstring Trump’s Administration for a while, but as McCarthy notes, they were playing with fire. Once it became obvious that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing, it would start to occur to Americans to ask, “Say, if there was no spying on the Republican candidate and his team, how did the government get all those ‘intercepted conversations’ that were leaked to the media?”

If journalists still thought their job was to dig up the truth rather than to undermine Trump and prop up the Democrats, that question might have occurred to them several weeks ago. Read the whole thing: