Today's News Stories

July 6, 2021
|

I hope you’re having a great 4th of July week, but between the celebratory fireworks on one hand and the anti-American political fireworks on the other, let’s take just a moment to reflect on what Independence Day really means and how it led to the freedoms and blessings that far too many Americans fail to appreciate these days.

Most historians (not New York Times writers, but real historians) mark the beginning of America as the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776. But in truth, there was still a long road to travel before America as we know it came to be. First, of course, there was the matter of fighting a bloody revolution against Great Britain, one where victory was an overwhelming longshot, and win or lose, the leaders risked their lives, honor and fortunes. Victory was followed by more heated battles over what kind of government we would have.

Our Forefathers finally agreed to a blueprint, the Constitution, that wasn’t even introduced until 1789 – over 13 years later. Today, many Americans take those hard-won freedoms very lightly and seem eager to trade them away for false promises of security. Many can’t even name the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Maybe they’d cherish them more if they knew how close they came to not having them at all.

Did you know that the Constitution very nearly got passed without the Bill of Rights? Even some of the wisest of our forefathers thought a Bill of Rights was a dangerous idea. Alexander Hamilton argued that it was risky to list the rights the government couldn’t take away because then, politicians might try to grab any and every power that wasn’t specifically prohibited to them (apparently, the ability to rap wasn’t the only way Hamilton predicted the 21st century). He and many others also felt that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary: since nobody was surrendering their God-given rights by agreeing to the Constitution, there was no need to list them, right? Hamilton wrote, “Why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”

It’s ironic that Hamilton made that argument. Later on, as the first Treasury Secretary, he cited powers that the Constitution merely implied that the government had in order to take on debt, create a federal bank and impose unpopular taxes. Over a century later, when the federal income tax was passed, some lawmakers wanted to include a 10% limit, but they were voted down. Opponents scoffed that it was absurd to think the government would ever steal as much as 10% of an American’s hard-earned wages. Flash forward just 30 years, and they were happily taxing away 94%. So just imagine how few freedoms we’d have today if they’d listened to Hamilton and decided it wasn’t necessary to put specific limits on government power.

Luckily for us all, Thomas Jefferson won the argument, and the Bill of Rights was added. They even included the 9th amendment, which I’ll bet most people can’t even describe. Here’s what it says:

“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

It means that just because some God-given rights aren’t specifically listed, that doesn’t mean the people cede them to the government. Maybe because so many of the framers were also farmers, they understood that like weeds, government tends to grow and grow, choking out the productive crops -- and like a bull, it will trample you if you don’t corral it. (Also, it produces the same thing a bull does.)

So if we want to preserve our freedoms, and keep government limited, maybe we should send more farmers to Washington -- and fewer lawyers.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

More Stories

The problem with Socialism

Comments 31-40 of 42

  • Bernice C. Buch

    07/06/2021 12:31 PM

    Your essay on "More Farmers, Less Lawyers" is excellent because it puts forward exactly what happens when the government chokes our our freedoms with all their law making. One person stubs their toe. While all of us are capable to avoid stubbing our toe Congress thinks we need help so they make a law limiting activities to keep us from stubbing our toe. We have more laws restricting our lives than we now what to do with.

  • philippe yaconelli

    07/06/2021 12:00 PM

    We need a compulsory draft like Israel does it

    Not everyone carries a gun but everyone serves 1 or 2 years and if not in Military - go to 3rd world country and dig wells, build schools, bridges, help poor people. Plant trees. Go out of this country to a real 3rd world country.

    Then and only then will the spoiled overly wealthy kids who "hate this country" realize how good they have it.

    No exceptions for rich kids or Doctors deferments.

    EVERYONE SERVES - INCLUDING THE BLUE BLOODS FROM IVY LEAGUE

    We are spoiled Fxxxing rotten

  • Dr. Glenn W. Briggs

    07/06/2021 11:53 AM

    Governor, I dearly wish that this narrative were mandated for addition to all schools’ curricula. All citizens need to know why certain issues and rules were included - and even excluded - in our historical documents.

  • Linda Mroz

    07/06/2021 11:47 AM

    I agree completely

  • Bob Harris

    07/06/2021 11:47 AM

    No, we should send more lawyers. Lawyers, those who are actually schooled in the law, are supposed to be part of the checks and balances against greed, the only thing that drives private business. Adam Smith believed that an invisible hand (God?) would guide against greed. But that has not worked well in actual practice. By the way, Adam Smith never wrote about THE invisible hand of the market place, and Smith and the founders were adamant that some level of socialism was necessary and they wrote about it extensively (although the term socialism did not yet exist). Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, and Lincoln all wrestled with the issue of internal improvements. Many of the founders wanted Federal ownership and/or support of all transportation (but especially the mails, and Federal support of post roads is in the constitution), manufacturing, the arts, and education. Think of the support of the Federal Aid Project highways and waterways, the frequent support and bailouts of failed industries including farmers and agricultural giants, the National Endowment of the Arts, and Federal aid to education. The Founders would be unsurprised and pleased. Under any definition, this is all socialism. And farmers are the first to rail against socialism, the very thing that sends checks to them to NOT plant and for other support. More farmers in government? I think not.

  • James King

    07/06/2021 11:47 AM

    Excellent idea. I have utilized lawyers 4 or 5 times and as far as I can tell, they are all liars.

  • Katharine Bertetto

    07/06/2021 11:43 AM

    This is an amazing piece of work! I am inclined to make the comment "YES,YES,YES!" This is a perfect reminder to us ALL that we have so very much to lose by ignoring our country and our legacy.
    This beautiful place needs....as a cherished child....to be vigorously and lovingly protected from lazy and neglectful idiots /politicians and entitled wealthy elites who have no care but themselves.

  • TERRI MOORE

    07/06/2021 11:32 AM

    Oh, so very well said!! I had to click on your link four times before google would let me open your web page to comment. It kept saying the server was down. phh

  • Leroy Chausse

    07/06/2021 11:20 AM

    Thanks Governor for the lesson. So important and appropriate during this time when the liberal agenda is rampant on taking away all those freedoms defined in our founding documents. TO GOD BE THE GLORY!

  • Charles Downs

    07/06/2021 11:14 AM

    Amen!
    As a rancher I agree we definitely need more honest & level headed people representing us in Washington, D.C.

    Thanks for the refreshing observation. .Tom Jefferson was awesome!!

Message from Mike Huckabee


    Help me fight back against Big Tech censorship. If you would like to subscribe to the daily, advertisement-free version of my newsletter for $5 monthly or $36 annually, on Substack, go here.


    Biden Scandal News

    July 6, 2021
    |

    I hope you’re having a great 4th of July week, but between the celebratory fireworks on one hand and the anti-American political fireworks on the other, let’s take just a moment to reflect on what Independence Day really means and how it led to the freedoms and blessings that far too many Americans fail to appreciate these days.

    Most historians (not New York Times writers, but real historians) mark the beginning of America as the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776. But in truth, there was still a long road to travel before America as we know it came to be. First, of course, there was the matter of fighting a bloody revolution against Great Britain, one where victory was an overwhelming longshot, and win or lose, the leaders risked their lives, honor and fortunes. Victory was followed by more heated battles over what kind of government we would have.

    Our Forefathers finally agreed to a blueprint, the Constitution, that wasn’t even introduced until 1789 – over 13 years later. Today, many Americans take those hard-won freedoms very lightly and seem eager to trade them away for false promises of security. Many can’t even name the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Maybe they’d cherish them more if they knew how close they came to not having them at all.

    Did you know that the Constitution very nearly got passed without the Bill of Rights? Even some of the wisest of our forefathers thought a Bill of Rights was a dangerous idea. Alexander Hamilton argued that it was risky to list the rights the government couldn’t take away because then, politicians might try to grab any and every power that wasn’t specifically prohibited to them (apparently, the ability to rap wasn’t the only way Hamilton predicted the 21st century). He and many others also felt that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary: since nobody was surrendering their God-given rights by agreeing to the Constitution, there was no need to list them, right? Hamilton wrote, “Why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”

    It’s ironic that Hamilton made that argument. Later on, as the first Treasury Secretary, he cited powers that the Constitution merely implied that the government had in order to take on debt, create a federal bank and impose unpopular taxes. Over a century later, when the federal income tax was passed, some lawmakers wanted to include a 10% limit, but they were voted down. Opponents scoffed that it was absurd to think the government would ever steal as much as 10% of an American’s hard-earned wages. Flash forward just 30 years, and they were happily taxing away 94%. So just imagine how few freedoms we’d have today if they’d listened to Hamilton and decided it wasn’t necessary to put specific limits on government power.

    Luckily for us all, Thomas Jefferson won the argument, and the Bill of Rights was added. They even included the 9th amendment, which I’ll bet most people can’t even describe. Here’s what it says:

    “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

    It means that just because some God-given rights aren’t specifically listed, that doesn’t mean the people cede them to the government. Maybe because so many of the framers were also farmers, they understood that like weeds, government tends to grow and grow, choking out the productive crops -- and like a bull, it will trample you if you don’t corral it. (Also, it produces the same thing a bull does.)

    So if we want to preserve our freedoms, and keep government limited, maybe we should send more farmers to Washington -- and fewer lawyers.

    Leave a Comment

    Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

    Your Information
    Your Comment
    BBML accepted!
    Captcha

    More Stories

    The problem with Socialism

    Comments 31-40 of 42

    • Bernice C. Buch

      07/06/2021 12:31 PM

      Your essay on "More Farmers, Less Lawyers" is excellent because it puts forward exactly what happens when the government chokes our our freedoms with all their law making. One person stubs their toe. While all of us are capable to avoid stubbing our toe Congress thinks we need help so they make a law limiting activities to keep us from stubbing our toe. We have more laws restricting our lives than we now what to do with.

    • philippe yaconelli

      07/06/2021 12:00 PM

      We need a compulsory draft like Israel does it

      Not everyone carries a gun but everyone serves 1 or 2 years and if not in Military - go to 3rd world country and dig wells, build schools, bridges, help poor people. Plant trees. Go out of this country to a real 3rd world country.

      Then and only then will the spoiled overly wealthy kids who "hate this country" realize how good they have it.

      No exceptions for rich kids or Doctors deferments.

      EVERYONE SERVES - INCLUDING THE BLUE BLOODS FROM IVY LEAGUE

      We are spoiled Fxxxing rotten

    • Dr. Glenn W. Briggs

      07/06/2021 11:53 AM

      Governor, I dearly wish that this narrative were mandated for addition to all schools’ curricula. All citizens need to know why certain issues and rules were included - and even excluded - in our historical documents.

    • Linda Mroz

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      I agree completely

    • Bob Harris

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      No, we should send more lawyers. Lawyers, those who are actually schooled in the law, are supposed to be part of the checks and balances against greed, the only thing that drives private business. Adam Smith believed that an invisible hand (God?) would guide against greed. But that has not worked well in actual practice. By the way, Adam Smith never wrote about THE invisible hand of the market place, and Smith and the founders were adamant that some level of socialism was necessary and they wrote about it extensively (although the term socialism did not yet exist). Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, and Lincoln all wrestled with the issue of internal improvements. Many of the founders wanted Federal ownership and/or support of all transportation (but especially the mails, and Federal support of post roads is in the constitution), manufacturing, the arts, and education. Think of the support of the Federal Aid Project highways and waterways, the frequent support and bailouts of failed industries including farmers and agricultural giants, the National Endowment of the Arts, and Federal aid to education. The Founders would be unsurprised and pleased. Under any definition, this is all socialism. And farmers are the first to rail against socialism, the very thing that sends checks to them to NOT plant and for other support. More farmers in government? I think not.

    • James King

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      Excellent idea. I have utilized lawyers 4 or 5 times and as far as I can tell, they are all liars.

    • Katharine Bertetto

      07/06/2021 11:43 AM

      This is an amazing piece of work! I am inclined to make the comment "YES,YES,YES!" This is a perfect reminder to us ALL that we have so very much to lose by ignoring our country and our legacy.
      This beautiful place needs....as a cherished child....to be vigorously and lovingly protected from lazy and neglectful idiots /politicians and entitled wealthy elites who have no care but themselves.

    • TERRI MOORE

      07/06/2021 11:32 AM

      Oh, so very well said!! I had to click on your link four times before google would let me open your web page to comment. It kept saying the server was down. phh

    • Leroy Chausse

      07/06/2021 11:20 AM

      Thanks Governor for the lesson. So important and appropriate during this time when the liberal agenda is rampant on taking away all those freedoms defined in our founding documents. TO GOD BE THE GLORY!

    • Charles Downs

      07/06/2021 11:14 AM

      Amen!
      As a rancher I agree we definitely need more honest & level headed people representing us in Washington, D.C.

      Thanks for the refreshing observation. .Tom Jefferson was awesome!!

    Trump Indictment News

    July 6, 2021
    |

    I hope you’re having a great 4th of July week, but between the celebratory fireworks on one hand and the anti-American political fireworks on the other, let’s take just a moment to reflect on what Independence Day really means and how it led to the freedoms and blessings that far too many Americans fail to appreciate these days.

    Most historians (not New York Times writers, but real historians) mark the beginning of America as the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776. But in truth, there was still a long road to travel before America as we know it came to be. First, of course, there was the matter of fighting a bloody revolution against Great Britain, one where victory was an overwhelming longshot, and win or lose, the leaders risked their lives, honor and fortunes. Victory was followed by more heated battles over what kind of government we would have.

    Our Forefathers finally agreed to a blueprint, the Constitution, that wasn’t even introduced until 1789 – over 13 years later. Today, many Americans take those hard-won freedoms very lightly and seem eager to trade them away for false promises of security. Many can’t even name the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Maybe they’d cherish them more if they knew how close they came to not having them at all.

    Did you know that the Constitution very nearly got passed without the Bill of Rights? Even some of the wisest of our forefathers thought a Bill of Rights was a dangerous idea. Alexander Hamilton argued that it was risky to list the rights the government couldn’t take away because then, politicians might try to grab any and every power that wasn’t specifically prohibited to them (apparently, the ability to rap wasn’t the only way Hamilton predicted the 21st century). He and many others also felt that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary: since nobody was surrendering their God-given rights by agreeing to the Constitution, there was no need to list them, right? Hamilton wrote, “Why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”

    It’s ironic that Hamilton made that argument. Later on, as the first Treasury Secretary, he cited powers that the Constitution merely implied that the government had in order to take on debt, create a federal bank and impose unpopular taxes. Over a century later, when the federal income tax was passed, some lawmakers wanted to include a 10% limit, but they were voted down. Opponents scoffed that it was absurd to think the government would ever steal as much as 10% of an American’s hard-earned wages. Flash forward just 30 years, and they were happily taxing away 94%. So just imagine how few freedoms we’d have today if they’d listened to Hamilton and decided it wasn’t necessary to put specific limits on government power.

    Luckily for us all, Thomas Jefferson won the argument, and the Bill of Rights was added. They even included the 9th amendment, which I’ll bet most people can’t even describe. Here’s what it says:

    “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

    It means that just because some God-given rights aren’t specifically listed, that doesn’t mean the people cede them to the government. Maybe because so many of the framers were also farmers, they understood that like weeds, government tends to grow and grow, choking out the productive crops -- and like a bull, it will trample you if you don’t corral it. (Also, it produces the same thing a bull does.)

    So if we want to preserve our freedoms, and keep government limited, maybe we should send more farmers to Washington -- and fewer lawyers.

    Leave a Comment

    Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

    Your Information
    Your Comment
    BBML accepted!
    Captcha

    More Stories

    The problem with Socialism

    Comments 31-40 of 42

    • Bernice C. Buch

      07/06/2021 12:31 PM

      Your essay on "More Farmers, Less Lawyers" is excellent because it puts forward exactly what happens when the government chokes our our freedoms with all their law making. One person stubs their toe. While all of us are capable to avoid stubbing our toe Congress thinks we need help so they make a law limiting activities to keep us from stubbing our toe. We have more laws restricting our lives than we now what to do with.

    • philippe yaconelli

      07/06/2021 12:00 PM

      We need a compulsory draft like Israel does it

      Not everyone carries a gun but everyone serves 1 or 2 years and if not in Military - go to 3rd world country and dig wells, build schools, bridges, help poor people. Plant trees. Go out of this country to a real 3rd world country.

      Then and only then will the spoiled overly wealthy kids who "hate this country" realize how good they have it.

      No exceptions for rich kids or Doctors deferments.

      EVERYONE SERVES - INCLUDING THE BLUE BLOODS FROM IVY LEAGUE

      We are spoiled Fxxxing rotten

    • Dr. Glenn W. Briggs

      07/06/2021 11:53 AM

      Governor, I dearly wish that this narrative were mandated for addition to all schools’ curricula. All citizens need to know why certain issues and rules were included - and even excluded - in our historical documents.

    • Linda Mroz

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      I agree completely

    • Bob Harris

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      No, we should send more lawyers. Lawyers, those who are actually schooled in the law, are supposed to be part of the checks and balances against greed, the only thing that drives private business. Adam Smith believed that an invisible hand (God?) would guide against greed. But that has not worked well in actual practice. By the way, Adam Smith never wrote about THE invisible hand of the market place, and Smith and the founders were adamant that some level of socialism was necessary and they wrote about it extensively (although the term socialism did not yet exist). Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, and Lincoln all wrestled with the issue of internal improvements. Many of the founders wanted Federal ownership and/or support of all transportation (but especially the mails, and Federal support of post roads is in the constitution), manufacturing, the arts, and education. Think of the support of the Federal Aid Project highways and waterways, the frequent support and bailouts of failed industries including farmers and agricultural giants, the National Endowment of the Arts, and Federal aid to education. The Founders would be unsurprised and pleased. Under any definition, this is all socialism. And farmers are the first to rail against socialism, the very thing that sends checks to them to NOT plant and for other support. More farmers in government? I think not.

    • James King

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      Excellent idea. I have utilized lawyers 4 or 5 times and as far as I can tell, they are all liars.

    • Katharine Bertetto

      07/06/2021 11:43 AM

      This is an amazing piece of work! I am inclined to make the comment "YES,YES,YES!" This is a perfect reminder to us ALL that we have so very much to lose by ignoring our country and our legacy.
      This beautiful place needs....as a cherished child....to be vigorously and lovingly protected from lazy and neglectful idiots /politicians and entitled wealthy elites who have no care but themselves.

    • TERRI MOORE

      07/06/2021 11:32 AM

      Oh, so very well said!! I had to click on your link four times before google would let me open your web page to comment. It kept saying the server was down. phh

    • Leroy Chausse

      07/06/2021 11:20 AM

      Thanks Governor for the lesson. So important and appropriate during this time when the liberal agenda is rampant on taking away all those freedoms defined in our founding documents. TO GOD BE THE GLORY!

    • Charles Downs

      07/06/2021 11:14 AM

      Amen!
      As a rancher I agree we definitely need more honest & level headed people representing us in Washington, D.C.

      Thanks for the refreshing observation. .Tom Jefferson was awesome!!

    Election 2024 Coverage

    July 6, 2021
    |

    I hope you’re having a great 4th of July week, but between the celebratory fireworks on one hand and the anti-American political fireworks on the other, let’s take just a moment to reflect on what Independence Day really means and how it led to the freedoms and blessings that far too many Americans fail to appreciate these days.

    Most historians (not New York Times writers, but real historians) mark the beginning of America as the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776. But in truth, there was still a long road to travel before America as we know it came to be. First, of course, there was the matter of fighting a bloody revolution against Great Britain, one where victory was an overwhelming longshot, and win or lose, the leaders risked their lives, honor and fortunes. Victory was followed by more heated battles over what kind of government we would have.

    Our Forefathers finally agreed to a blueprint, the Constitution, that wasn’t even introduced until 1789 – over 13 years later. Today, many Americans take those hard-won freedoms very lightly and seem eager to trade them away for false promises of security. Many can’t even name the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Maybe they’d cherish them more if they knew how close they came to not having them at all.

    Did you know that the Constitution very nearly got passed without the Bill of Rights? Even some of the wisest of our forefathers thought a Bill of Rights was a dangerous idea. Alexander Hamilton argued that it was risky to list the rights the government couldn’t take away because then, politicians might try to grab any and every power that wasn’t specifically prohibited to them (apparently, the ability to rap wasn’t the only way Hamilton predicted the 21st century). He and many others also felt that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary: since nobody was surrendering their God-given rights by agreeing to the Constitution, there was no need to list them, right? Hamilton wrote, “Why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”

    It’s ironic that Hamilton made that argument. Later on, as the first Treasury Secretary, he cited powers that the Constitution merely implied that the government had in order to take on debt, create a federal bank and impose unpopular taxes. Over a century later, when the federal income tax was passed, some lawmakers wanted to include a 10% limit, but they were voted down. Opponents scoffed that it was absurd to think the government would ever steal as much as 10% of an American’s hard-earned wages. Flash forward just 30 years, and they were happily taxing away 94%. So just imagine how few freedoms we’d have today if they’d listened to Hamilton and decided it wasn’t necessary to put specific limits on government power.

    Luckily for us all, Thomas Jefferson won the argument, and the Bill of Rights was added. They even included the 9th amendment, which I’ll bet most people can’t even describe. Here’s what it says:

    “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

    It means that just because some God-given rights aren’t specifically listed, that doesn’t mean the people cede them to the government. Maybe because so many of the framers were also farmers, they understood that like weeds, government tends to grow and grow, choking out the productive crops -- and like a bull, it will trample you if you don’t corral it. (Also, it produces the same thing a bull does.)

    So if we want to preserve our freedoms, and keep government limited, maybe we should send more farmers to Washington -- and fewer lawyers.

    Leave a Comment

    Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

    Your Information
    Your Comment
    BBML accepted!
    Captcha

    More Stories

    The problem with Socialism

    Comments 31-40 of 42

    • Bernice C. Buch

      07/06/2021 12:31 PM

      Your essay on "More Farmers, Less Lawyers" is excellent because it puts forward exactly what happens when the government chokes our our freedoms with all their law making. One person stubs their toe. While all of us are capable to avoid stubbing our toe Congress thinks we need help so they make a law limiting activities to keep us from stubbing our toe. We have more laws restricting our lives than we now what to do with.

    • philippe yaconelli

      07/06/2021 12:00 PM

      We need a compulsory draft like Israel does it

      Not everyone carries a gun but everyone serves 1 or 2 years and if not in Military - go to 3rd world country and dig wells, build schools, bridges, help poor people. Plant trees. Go out of this country to a real 3rd world country.

      Then and only then will the spoiled overly wealthy kids who "hate this country" realize how good they have it.

      No exceptions for rich kids or Doctors deferments.

      EVERYONE SERVES - INCLUDING THE BLUE BLOODS FROM IVY LEAGUE

      We are spoiled Fxxxing rotten

    • Dr. Glenn W. Briggs

      07/06/2021 11:53 AM

      Governor, I dearly wish that this narrative were mandated for addition to all schools’ curricula. All citizens need to know why certain issues and rules were included - and even excluded - in our historical documents.

    • Linda Mroz

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      I agree completely

    • Bob Harris

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      No, we should send more lawyers. Lawyers, those who are actually schooled in the law, are supposed to be part of the checks and balances against greed, the only thing that drives private business. Adam Smith believed that an invisible hand (God?) would guide against greed. But that has not worked well in actual practice. By the way, Adam Smith never wrote about THE invisible hand of the market place, and Smith and the founders were adamant that some level of socialism was necessary and they wrote about it extensively (although the term socialism did not yet exist). Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, and Lincoln all wrestled with the issue of internal improvements. Many of the founders wanted Federal ownership and/or support of all transportation (but especially the mails, and Federal support of post roads is in the constitution), manufacturing, the arts, and education. Think of the support of the Federal Aid Project highways and waterways, the frequent support and bailouts of failed industries including farmers and agricultural giants, the National Endowment of the Arts, and Federal aid to education. The Founders would be unsurprised and pleased. Under any definition, this is all socialism. And farmers are the first to rail against socialism, the very thing that sends checks to them to NOT plant and for other support. More farmers in government? I think not.

    • James King

      07/06/2021 11:47 AM

      Excellent idea. I have utilized lawyers 4 or 5 times and as far as I can tell, they are all liars.

    • Katharine Bertetto

      07/06/2021 11:43 AM

      This is an amazing piece of work! I am inclined to make the comment "YES,YES,YES!" This is a perfect reminder to us ALL that we have so very much to lose by ignoring our country and our legacy.
      This beautiful place needs....as a cherished child....to be vigorously and lovingly protected from lazy and neglectful idiots /politicians and entitled wealthy elites who have no care but themselves.

    • TERRI MOORE

      07/06/2021 11:32 AM

      Oh, so very well said!! I had to click on your link four times before google would let me open your web page to comment. It kept saying the server was down. phh

    • Leroy Chausse

      07/06/2021 11:20 AM

      Thanks Governor for the lesson. So important and appropriate during this time when the liberal agenda is rampant on taking away all those freedoms defined in our founding documents. TO GOD BE THE GLORY!

    • Charles Downs

      07/06/2021 11:14 AM

      Amen!
      As a rancher I agree we definitely need more honest & level headed people representing us in Washington, D.C.

      Thanks for the refreshing observation. .Tom Jefferson was awesome!!