June 1, 2017

Today's Commentary:  Hillary Speaks -- Democrat Operative Rebuts Hillary Spin -- Chasing Cars

Every time Hillary Clinton speaks these days, it’s like an exciting riverboat ride on De Nile. You know she’ll talk about the election, but some new surprising reason always pops up for why she lost. In an interview at the Recode Code Conference, Hillary took full responsibility for her loss before immediately blaming it on Russia; fake news on social media; the press making a big deal over her unsecure email server, which she called “the biggest nothing burger ever” (so I guess if any secret intelligence sources were killed because her cavalier handling of classified information revealed their identities, or if Americans in Benghazi died because her leaked emails revealed their lack of security, their causes of death should officially be listed as “lethal indigestion from a nothing burger”); and in a new development, the Democratic Party and the DNC, which she claimed gave her nothing – aside from stacking the primaries against Bernie and giving her CNN’s townhall questions in advance.

Not that I want to encourage her, but it can’t be a wise idea to trash the DNC if you’re planning to run and lose for a third time in 2020.


Mike Huckabee


Commentary continues below advertisement


Democrat Operative Rebuts Hillary Spin

By Mike Huckabee

One person who didn’t take kindly to being Hillary Clinton’s latest scapegoat for losing the election (which she really won!) is Andrew Therriault. He was head of the data team for the DNC, the people who compiled the polling data that she dismissed as “mediocre to poor, non-existent, wrong.” Therriault took to Twitter to defend his people and his numbers. You can read those tweets, along with a couple he later deleted, at the link. Warning, he utilizes a few favorite Democratic Party words that most red state folks don’t repeat in polite company.

For Hillary to blame the DNC data team for her own bad campaign decisions is as disingenuous as her blaming Russia or “fake news” or the powerful conservative media or that horrible mainstream media that treated her so badly while not attacking Donald Trump (where did she give his interview, on Bizarro World?) In one of his deleted tweets, Therriault claimed the DNC data team never had Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania looking anywhere close to safe for Hillary, but “her team thought they knew better.” This would jibe with the book “Shattered,” which revealed that Bill Clinton tried to warn her campaign that she needed to shore up support from blue collar voters, but her data guru sniffily dismissed the guy who’d actually won the Presidency twice, saying that Bill’s anecdotal evidence didn’t match his data set.

In truth, the only truly bad data out there was in Hillary’s campaign and all the polls that kept trying to convince us the race was over. I feel uniquely qualified to comment on this because I was one of only a tiny handful of media figures who predicted a Trump win and stuck to it even when a WaPo poll had Hillary ahead by 11 points. Interviewers would chuckle and roll their eyes at poor deluded ol’ Uncle Huck, or assume that I was just trying to put a brave spin on the disaster. No, it’s just that after a lifetime in politics, I know how to read the internals of polls, and I know garbage when I see it. Those polls assumed there was so much enthusiasm for Hillary that she would draw even more black votes than Obama, when she couldn’t even fill a high school gym. One “shock poll” that showed her winning in Arizona had to oversample Democrats by 24 points to get her a 5-point lead. How could anyone possibly have believed that? Only because they wanted to believe it so badly. But Hillary Clinton isn't Tinkerbell. Clapping and saying, "I DO believe in Hillary!" won't make her President.

It’s said that the worst thing a politician can do is to start believing his (or her) own propaganda. I can’t imagine the DNC data people were dumb enough to make that mistake, but judging from Hillary’s recent comments, I’m absolutely convinced she believed it.



Chasing Cars

By Mike Huckabee

Democrats kept howling for an investigation of any 2016 campaign chicanery, and like the dog that chased cars until he caught one, they may be sorry they ever started this pursuit. The House Intelligence Committee has issued subpoenas for witnesses to testify, but just as Democrats were salivating at the thought of grilling all those Trump aides about Russia on TV, there came news that must’ve hit them like a 2-by-4 in the forehead: three of the subpoenas are for information relating to Obama officials; former national security adviser Susan Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan and former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power. The Committee seems interested in finding out how names of Trump aides were illegally unmasked after they talked to someone who was being monitored by the NSA. The names of Americans caught in surveillance of outside parties, like Michael Flynn, are supposed to be kept secret.

Just as a reminder: the leaking of Flynn’s name to the press is still the only actual violation of federal law that has been exposed in this entire, endless paranoid fever dream known as the “Russian collusion scandal.” Democrats have been so focused on attacking everyone associated with Trump and trying to blame a Russian conspiracy for their own election loss that it apparently never occurred to them that a wide-ranging investigation of wrongdoing might turn up far more slime on their side than on the Republican side. And it might not be limited to this Committee: the special counsel they demanded, Robert Mueller, has a mandate to examine all aspects of alleged Russian collusion. “All aspects” could easily include Obama officials who might have politicized the US intelligence apparatus to spy on Trump aides and illegally unmasked their names to undermine his Administration.

I suspect these Democratic bloodhounds are going to end up being sorry they ever started chasing this car and wish they’d just let sleeping dogs lie.

Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this edition of the newsletter please forward it to a friend and tell them they can subscribe for free at


Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!

More Stories

Comments 1-2 of 2

  • Bill Booher

    06/02/2017 08:57 AM

    She's a communist (of sorts). Observe the Perestroika and how it is used.

  • Jerry D. Woods

    06/01/2017 12:38 PM

    What is the significance of the picture where you are writing on a podium ?