Ainsworth: Michelle O follow-up; answers to readers

March 6, 2020 |

From Jan:

Good article. One thing I have actually thought about is that Joe is such a liability to the party because of his son, Hunter, and their actions in the Ukraine. Honestly, what I think is a possibility is that the DNC will actually work toward bringing Joe down themselves, once he gets the nomination. Using this scenario as an excuse to get him out and get someone who they really would like to get in there; i.e., Michelle Obama or someone with that kind of star power.

From Laura:

Thanks for writing, Jan. I chose not to venture into the Ukraine/Hunter Biden issue because the wheels of justice turn sooooo slowly, it’s hard to know how much of a factor this will become to Democrat voters (who, lest we forget, always forgive their own) before the convention and/or the election. But it certainly could create more scenarios, and you're right: it’s one more way to get him replaced at some point. The Dems surely have even more contingency plans in case Durham delivers his report.


RELATED READINGAinsworth: With Biden winning, watch what Michelle O does now


Their move will depend on the timing of that report. Here’s just one of several possibilities: Biden picks Michelle as running mate; with her popularity, they win; before inauguration (it can't be after, because Barr would have been fired on Day 1 and the investigation stopped), Durham report finally comes out and shows criminality and cover-up; Biden relinquishes office in lieu of impeachment (a la Nixon) “for the good of the country”; Michelle assumes Presidency. The Obama machine gets back in.

Or, the report comes out sooner, before November, with Biden possibly having to step away from his nomination before the election. But in that case, too, Michelle steps in and if she wins, the result is the same: the Obama machine gets back in.

By the way, the Senate has just started its own investigation into Burisma and Hunter Biden, with Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson vowing to force a vote on the first subpoena as soon as next week. From their end, Ukraine is also investigating.

https://news.yahoo.com/ron-johnson-claims-burisma-linked-143831493.html

Right now, the Democrats –- with help from Mitt Romney, who might as well be one –- are trying to taint the Senate investigation as purely political. They will do everything possible to stall the process and keep old Joe viable at least until the convention and the naming of Michelle as his running mate. The media will help them by continuing to downplay Biden’s mental deterioration and ignoring any damaging developments in the Ukraine scandal.

 

From Lorna:

Comment/question: Would she qualify? I have read where she doesn't have the 14-year citizenship requirement because of her tax status. Her parents filed her out of country for education benefits and she filed out of country while she was in college. I wish I could recall where I read this but I remember looking and if true, she wouldn't be eligible until 2021.

 

From Laura:

Very interesting question! This may have been what you read…

https://newinformation.today/2017/03/michelle-obama-just-tried-to-register-to-run-for-president-but-was-denied/

First, on counting the number of years: the Constitution is vague on whether the 14 years need to be consecutive or cumulative. But there is precedent for the “cumulative” argument: the presidency of Herbert Hoover. Hoover was elected in 1928 and inaugurated in 1929. As USConstitution explains, if the “consecutive” argument were correct, Hoover would’ve had to live in the U.S. since March of 1915. But he’d lived in London for a time during that period. In fact, the Court Directory of London lists a London address for him from 1910 to 1917. So that precedent dispenses with the “consecutive” interpretation and leaves us with the “cumulative.”

https://usconstitution.net/constfaq_q19.html

And what exactly does “residence” entail? The early Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story said this: “by ‘residence,’ in the Constitution, [it] is to be understood, not an absolute inhabitancy within the United States during the whole period; but such an inhabitancy, as includes a permanent domicile within the United States.”

I’m not a lawyer, but it would seem that this requirement is flexible enough for Michelle to get around it. Obviously, she was living here, regardless of what her sneaky tax returns say, and she would be able to prove she was. The founders included the residency requirement to give the candidate a tangible tie to this country, and she would argue that she absolutely has that, fulfilling the founders’ intent.

It should be noted for the purposes of our discussion that the 12th Amendment made the same qualifications for President apply to the Vice President.

https://www.thoughtco.com/requirements-to-serve-as-president-3322199

You’ll recall there were challenges to Barack Obama’s candidacy as well, his having to do with whether or not he was born in the United States and also –- the one I still puzzle over –- whether his American citizenship was renounced when he was signed up to attend a Muslim school in Indonesia as a boy.

https://observer.com/2007/01/actually-obama-did-go-to-a-madrasah/

As far as I know, we have NEVER been provided the paperwork on this, nor that of much of Obama’s official life, not even his college transcripts or writings while in school –- which is pretty curious for an editor of the Harvard Law Review. But you’ll notice he got to run, and serve, as President for two terms despite the murkiness concerning his citizenship and background. I doubt that any “residence” challenge to Michelle’s candidacy would stop her.

While researching the answer to this question, I came upon a piece in AMERICAN THINKER from April of last year that mentions what the great Rush Limbaugh was saying then about the Obamas trying to get back into the White House. Seems I’m in good company.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/04/is_michelle_obama_trying_to_run_for_president_with_her_knock_on_divorced_dads_us_cities.html

Rush speculated then that Michelle wouldn’t throw her hat into the ring unless it was a virtual certainty that she would win. I agree, but this sort of “backdoor” way into the White House via Biden’s candidacy is different. She wouldn’t be getting in as a traditional candidate.

https://www.wnd.com/2019/04/limbaugh-michelle-obama-wont-run-for-president-if/

In July of last year, Rush explained what her motivation for running would be; namely, preserving as much of the “Obama legacy” as possible. Oh, goody.

https://thehornnews.com/report-michelle-obama-preparing-2020-presidential-run/

But here’s a different viewpoint posted August 26 of last year at AMERICAN SPECTATOR. David Catron believes that although Michelle is the Most Admired Woman in the world and all that, even she would have a tough slog running against President Trump, who would give her a hard time about some atrocious things she’s said over the years. (Note: Trump had better be careful how he treats her, though, or that could backfire.) I still say much has happened since last August --- the implosion of the Democrat lineup and, especially, the further deterioration of Biden --- to make a Michelle run likely, either as a last-minute substitute for him or as #2 on the ticket with him, as he quietly fades away.

https://spectator.org/why-michelle-obama-wont-run-in-2020/

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

Comments 1-8 of 8

  • Sue Perry

    04/26/2020 12:44 AM

    This article should make the hair stand up on any God fearing Americans neck! AND more imperative to get the scum in the swamp exposed soon!! Senate better step up that investigation!!

  • R M Walker

    03/14/2020 01:21 PM

    Scary should she ever become President ! She would undo all the advances Trump has made for the good of our country!!!

  • Amelia Baugh

    03/07/2020 09:02 AM

    What was so great about Michelle???. She didn’t impress me at all!
    She wasn’t patriotic at all! Just like her husband!??

  • Jennifer Tophoney

    03/06/2020 09:46 PM

    I guess what I'm wondering is why bother with primaries if in the end the party can choose any unvetted VP that they want, knowing that THAT person will, in time, end up with the office of the presidency. Isn't there a process in place for selection/qualification of a running mate?

  • Charlotte Christensen

    03/06/2020 09:07 PM

    Every scenario you presented could surly happen. I myself was thinking upon those lines my thoughts being Michelle will join as VP when Joe finally announces his choice.
    Something happens to Joe and Michelle obviously picks Obama as VP or Hillary.
    The only thing about Hillary is she may snub that if she can’t be President! Whatever happens the Obama’s are already counting on it. I just don’t see the star power of either Obama!

  • Patricia Yarber

    03/06/2020 08:01 PM

    Let me try to explain how very tired of knowing that Clintons,Bidens,Romney's, Schiff, Pelosi's, Soros,and no telling how many more is involved with Ukraine, China, Brazil, Britain, Australia, Russia, Iran ,and Haiti and could be even more countries they are all involved in crininal dealings, and ya'll and the justice dept are just sitting on your ass doing nothing, but asking us to take a poll so you can see what we the people want. I'll tell you, we want those bastards locked up like you promised. Everyone is talking about how tired we are oc talking about it, it's time to do it. Hillary still owes a debt on the Benghazi deal, and what was it ,5 souls? Then there is the e-mails she distrpyed. The equipment,computers,
    phones, ect. That i take it belonged to us. Then there is wrong doing within their foundation. Which They collected a lot of money for Haitians when Haiti was distroyed by Storm. They never even got 2%of the money donated to Haiti through the Clinton foundation. Yes sir I'm pissed.I want to see them pay for what they have put us through.

  • JanC

    03/06/2020 06:18 PM

    Thank you! Actually all pretty frightening! And then take into consideration the possibility of stealing/cheating votes. KAG! PRAY!

  • Elva Ewell

    03/06/2020 05:44 PM

    The Dems want an Obama era to return but there are many who learned a hard lesson and have turned away from it. Some of those very people voted Trump in 2016.