Today's News Stories

August 7, 2021
|

Among the many nasty surprises buried in the 2700-page “barebones” compromise “infrastructure” bill is a provision to establish a pilot program to examine the feasibility of a national, per-mile “user fee” on all motorists – i.e., a tax on every mile you drive (since Biden hasn’t made driving expensive enough already.)

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/08/05/infrastructure-bill-has-provision-that-could-lead-to-big-fees-on-americans-and-blow-up-bidens-promise-on-taxes-n421952

Democrats are trying to brush off questions about this by claiming it’s not a tax hike, it’s just to study the possibility of a mileage tax in the future that might not ever be imposed. If you think that Democrats will go to that much trouble to workshop a big new tax and then not impose it, I have some oceanfront property in Kansas I’d like to sell you.

Here’s more waste stuffed into that bill…

https://redstate.com/heartlandinstitute/2021/08/06/bidens-infrastructure-bill-includes-massive-slush-funds-for-green-energy-boondoggles-n421817

It also includes a piddling $1 billion for a commission headed by Sen. Joe Manchin’s wife…

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/08/03/one-payoff-in-the-infrastructure-deal-is-so-blatantly-corrupt-that-you-almost-have-to-respect-the-hustle-n420584

And blogger Lawrence Person also lists some not-very-infrastructurey items hidden in that bill, from state-mandated carbon reduction programs to racial quotas on broadband.

https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=48841

Person also includes this quote, which every Republican who supports this bill should be required to respond to, from two researchers at the Texas Public Policy Foundation: “It has just $110 billion, or less than 10% (of its spending), for what’s historically been considered infrastructure – roads and bridges. The other 90% is to fund mass transit waste, green energy nonsense and more items that the states or the private sector could do.”

I often wonder, if leftists are really that concerned about carbon emissions, why don’t they stop burning massive piles of our tax money?

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

More Stories

Election interference

“Not This (BLEEP) Again!”

Biden to Morehouse College

Comments 41-44 of 44

  • James Cormier

    08/07/2021 10:05 PM

    this whole bill needs to be quashed. nothing but as slush fund to enrich both sides of the isle. convention of states or President Trump needs to be enacted into power..

  • William Jakovac

    08/07/2021 02:42 PM

    Why have a pilot study when the results are already known. The tax is already typed up and ready for legislation. But why bother with legislation when Pharaoh Biden can wave his royal scepter and say let it be said, so let it be written?

    Why not have a shoe tax for the miles we’ll have to walk when the cars run out of gas and the electric vehicles run out of electric? Sorry, but I just may have listed a tax they didn’t think of imposing.

  • Dennis L Lokken

    08/07/2021 12:47 PM

    per mile tax is the right idea. However, it should be imposed on electric vehicles. Currently people such as myself pay both state and federal tax on gasoline at the pump. Obviously electric vehicles pay nothing. So, I am subsidizing some $50,000-80,000 Tesla owners driving. Electric vehicles do just as much damage to infrastructure as gas powered vehicles.

  • Bonnie Cole

    08/07/2021 10:49 AM

    Thank you Governor for sharing "some" of what's in this bill. I pray it never passes in any form. God help us.

Message from Mike Huckabee


    Help me fight back against Big Tech censorship. If you would like to subscribe to the daily, advertisement-free version of my newsletter for $5 monthly or $36 annually, on Substack, go here.


    Biden Scandal News

    August 7, 2021
    |

    Among the many nasty surprises buried in the 2700-page “barebones” compromise “infrastructure” bill is a provision to establish a pilot program to examine the feasibility of a national, per-mile “user fee” on all motorists – i.e., a tax on every mile you drive (since Biden hasn’t made driving expensive enough already.)

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/08/05/infrastructure-bill-has-provision-that-could-lead-to-big-fees-on-americans-and-blow-up-bidens-promise-on-taxes-n421952

    Democrats are trying to brush off questions about this by claiming it’s not a tax hike, it’s just to study the possibility of a mileage tax in the future that might not ever be imposed. If you think that Democrats will go to that much trouble to workshop a big new tax and then not impose it, I have some oceanfront property in Kansas I’d like to sell you.

    Here’s more waste stuffed into that bill…

    https://redstate.com/heartlandinstitute/2021/08/06/bidens-infrastructure-bill-includes-massive-slush-funds-for-green-energy-boondoggles-n421817

    It also includes a piddling $1 billion for a commission headed by Sen. Joe Manchin’s wife…

    https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/08/03/one-payoff-in-the-infrastructure-deal-is-so-blatantly-corrupt-that-you-almost-have-to-respect-the-hustle-n420584

    And blogger Lawrence Person also lists some not-very-infrastructurey items hidden in that bill, from state-mandated carbon reduction programs to racial quotas on broadband.

    https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=48841

    Person also includes this quote, which every Republican who supports this bill should be required to respond to, from two researchers at the Texas Public Policy Foundation: “It has just $110 billion, or less than 10% (of its spending), for what’s historically been considered infrastructure – roads and bridges. The other 90% is to fund mass transit waste, green energy nonsense and more items that the states or the private sector could do.”

    I often wonder, if leftists are really that concerned about carbon emissions, why don’t they stop burning massive piles of our tax money?

    Leave a Comment

    Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

    Your Information
    Your Comment
    BBML accepted!
    Captcha

    More Stories

    Election interference

    “Not This (BLEEP) Again!”

    Biden to Morehouse College

    Comments 41-44 of 44

    • James Cormier

      08/07/2021 10:05 PM

      this whole bill needs to be quashed. nothing but as slush fund to enrich both sides of the isle. convention of states or President Trump needs to be enacted into power..

    • William Jakovac

      08/07/2021 02:42 PM

      Why have a pilot study when the results are already known. The tax is already typed up and ready for legislation. But why bother with legislation when Pharaoh Biden can wave his royal scepter and say let it be said, so let it be written?

      Why not have a shoe tax for the miles we’ll have to walk when the cars run out of gas and the electric vehicles run out of electric? Sorry, but I just may have listed a tax they didn’t think of imposing.

    • Dennis L Lokken

      08/07/2021 12:47 PM

      per mile tax is the right idea. However, it should be imposed on electric vehicles. Currently people such as myself pay both state and federal tax on gasoline at the pump. Obviously electric vehicles pay nothing. So, I am subsidizing some $50,000-80,000 Tesla owners driving. Electric vehicles do just as much damage to infrastructure as gas powered vehicles.

    • Bonnie Cole

      08/07/2021 10:49 AM

      Thank you Governor for sharing "some" of what's in this bill. I pray it never passes in any form. God help us.

    Trump Indictment News

    August 7, 2021
    |

    Among the many nasty surprises buried in the 2700-page “barebones” compromise “infrastructure” bill is a provision to establish a pilot program to examine the feasibility of a national, per-mile “user fee” on all motorists – i.e., a tax on every mile you drive (since Biden hasn’t made driving expensive enough already.)

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/08/05/infrastructure-bill-has-provision-that-could-lead-to-big-fees-on-americans-and-blow-up-bidens-promise-on-taxes-n421952

    Democrats are trying to brush off questions about this by claiming it’s not a tax hike, it’s just to study the possibility of a mileage tax in the future that might not ever be imposed. If you think that Democrats will go to that much trouble to workshop a big new tax and then not impose it, I have some oceanfront property in Kansas I’d like to sell you.

    Here’s more waste stuffed into that bill…

    https://redstate.com/heartlandinstitute/2021/08/06/bidens-infrastructure-bill-includes-massive-slush-funds-for-green-energy-boondoggles-n421817

    It also includes a piddling $1 billion for a commission headed by Sen. Joe Manchin’s wife…

    https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/08/03/one-payoff-in-the-infrastructure-deal-is-so-blatantly-corrupt-that-you-almost-have-to-respect-the-hustle-n420584

    And blogger Lawrence Person also lists some not-very-infrastructurey items hidden in that bill, from state-mandated carbon reduction programs to racial quotas on broadband.

    https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=48841

    Person also includes this quote, which every Republican who supports this bill should be required to respond to, from two researchers at the Texas Public Policy Foundation: “It has just $110 billion, or less than 10% (of its spending), for what’s historically been considered infrastructure – roads and bridges. The other 90% is to fund mass transit waste, green energy nonsense and more items that the states or the private sector could do.”

    I often wonder, if leftists are really that concerned about carbon emissions, why don’t they stop burning massive piles of our tax money?

    Leave a Comment

    Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

    Your Information
    Your Comment
    BBML accepted!
    Captcha

    More Stories

    Election interference

    “Not This (BLEEP) Again!”

    Biden to Morehouse College

    Comments 41-44 of 44

    • James Cormier

      08/07/2021 10:05 PM

      this whole bill needs to be quashed. nothing but as slush fund to enrich both sides of the isle. convention of states or President Trump needs to be enacted into power..

    • William Jakovac

      08/07/2021 02:42 PM

      Why have a pilot study when the results are already known. The tax is already typed up and ready for legislation. But why bother with legislation when Pharaoh Biden can wave his royal scepter and say let it be said, so let it be written?

      Why not have a shoe tax for the miles we’ll have to walk when the cars run out of gas and the electric vehicles run out of electric? Sorry, but I just may have listed a tax they didn’t think of imposing.

    • Dennis L Lokken

      08/07/2021 12:47 PM

      per mile tax is the right idea. However, it should be imposed on electric vehicles. Currently people such as myself pay both state and federal tax on gasoline at the pump. Obviously electric vehicles pay nothing. So, I am subsidizing some $50,000-80,000 Tesla owners driving. Electric vehicles do just as much damage to infrastructure as gas powered vehicles.

    • Bonnie Cole

      08/07/2021 10:49 AM

      Thank you Governor for sharing "some" of what's in this bill. I pray it never passes in any form. God help us.

    Election 2024 Coverage

    August 7, 2021
    |

    Among the many nasty surprises buried in the 2700-page “barebones” compromise “infrastructure” bill is a provision to establish a pilot program to examine the feasibility of a national, per-mile “user fee” on all motorists – i.e., a tax on every mile you drive (since Biden hasn’t made driving expensive enough already.)

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/08/05/infrastructure-bill-has-provision-that-could-lead-to-big-fees-on-americans-and-blow-up-bidens-promise-on-taxes-n421952

    Democrats are trying to brush off questions about this by claiming it’s not a tax hike, it’s just to study the possibility of a mileage tax in the future that might not ever be imposed. If you think that Democrats will go to that much trouble to workshop a big new tax and then not impose it, I have some oceanfront property in Kansas I’d like to sell you.

    Here’s more waste stuffed into that bill…

    https://redstate.com/heartlandinstitute/2021/08/06/bidens-infrastructure-bill-includes-massive-slush-funds-for-green-energy-boondoggles-n421817

    It also includes a piddling $1 billion for a commission headed by Sen. Joe Manchin’s wife…

    https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/08/03/one-payoff-in-the-infrastructure-deal-is-so-blatantly-corrupt-that-you-almost-have-to-respect-the-hustle-n420584

    And blogger Lawrence Person also lists some not-very-infrastructurey items hidden in that bill, from state-mandated carbon reduction programs to racial quotas on broadband.

    https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=48841

    Person also includes this quote, which every Republican who supports this bill should be required to respond to, from two researchers at the Texas Public Policy Foundation: “It has just $110 billion, or less than 10% (of its spending), for what’s historically been considered infrastructure – roads and bridges. The other 90% is to fund mass transit waste, green energy nonsense and more items that the states or the private sector could do.”

    I often wonder, if leftists are really that concerned about carbon emissions, why don’t they stop burning massive piles of our tax money?

    Leave a Comment

    Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

    Your Information
    Your Comment
    BBML accepted!
    Captcha

    More Stories

    Election interference

    “Not This (BLEEP) Again!”

    Biden to Morehouse College

    Comments 41-44 of 44

    • James Cormier

      08/07/2021 10:05 PM

      this whole bill needs to be quashed. nothing but as slush fund to enrich both sides of the isle. convention of states or President Trump needs to be enacted into power..

    • William Jakovac

      08/07/2021 02:42 PM

      Why have a pilot study when the results are already known. The tax is already typed up and ready for legislation. But why bother with legislation when Pharaoh Biden can wave his royal scepter and say let it be said, so let it be written?

      Why not have a shoe tax for the miles we’ll have to walk when the cars run out of gas and the electric vehicles run out of electric? Sorry, but I just may have listed a tax they didn’t think of imposing.

    • Dennis L Lokken

      08/07/2021 12:47 PM

      per mile tax is the right idea. However, it should be imposed on electric vehicles. Currently people such as myself pay both state and federal tax on gasoline at the pump. Obviously electric vehicles pay nothing. So, I am subsidizing some $50,000-80,000 Tesla owners driving. Electric vehicles do just as much damage to infrastructure as gas powered vehicles.

    • Bonnie Cole

      08/07/2021 10:49 AM

      Thank you Governor for sharing "some" of what's in this bill. I pray it never passes in any form. God help us.